Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pabitra Kumar Mahapatra vs State Of Odisha & Anr. .... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 5538 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5538 Ori
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Orissa High Court

Pabitra Kumar Mahapatra vs State Of Odisha & Anr. .... Opposite ... on 18 August, 2025

Author: Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi
Bench: Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                     W.P.(C) No.22716 of 2025
                      Pabitra Kumar Mahapatra ....                   Petitioner
                                             Mr. Sitansu Mohan Singh, Advocate
                                             -versus-
                      State of Odisha & Anr.      ....         Opposite Parties
                                                          Mr. Pravakar Behera,
                                                             Standing Counsel

                              CORAM:
                              DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI
             Order                               ORDER
             No.                                18.08.2025

              01.     1.     This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the

Petitioner with the following prayer:

"It is prayed therefore that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to;

vii) Issue notice to the Opposite Parties;

viii) Call for the records;

ix) Issue Rule Nisi, calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the Opposite Party No-2 shall not be directed to transmit the VCRs against the Vehicle No- OR-07-

P-3737 under Annexure-2 Series to the Court of learned J.M.F.C.(Transport), Cuttack to disposed off the same as per law, keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Court in Anjana Babulal Darabad case dated 15.01.2014 within a stipulated time;

And if the Opposite Parties did not show

Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK made absolute and a writ of mandamus may be

issued to the Opposite Parties, particularly to the Opposite Party No.2 to transmit the VCRs to the court of learned J.M.F.C. (Transport), Cuttack within a stipulated time or its disposal as per law;

And further be pleased to pass any appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper for the ends of justice in favour of the petitioner;"

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Court

has earlier decided the similar issue in the judgment dated

15.01.2014 passed in W.P.(C) No.1500 of 2004 (Anjana

Babulal Darabad vrs. Commissioner, S.T.A. & Ors.) and

batch of Writ Petitions. Hence, he submits that this Writ

Petition may be disposed of in the light of the judgment

passed in the case of Anjana Babulal (supra).

5. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that they

have no objection, if this matter is disposed of in the light of

the judgment passed in the case of Anjana Babulal (supra).

6. On perusal of the records and the judgment passed in the

case of Anjana Babulal (supra), it appears that similar issue

has already been decided by this Court in the said judgment

which was disposed of on 15.01.2014. The ordering portion

of the said judgment is as follows:

" xxx xxx xxx

v) Pending such approval, direction is hereby given to the OMVD Officers issuing the VCR to direct the

driver/owner/person in possession and control of motor Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK vehicle either compound the offence on payment of Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 19-Aug-2025 16:42:53

prescribed fine offline/online or to appear before the STA/RTA and produce the demanded documents for disposal of VCR within fifteen days, failing which the VCR issuing officer will submit prosecution report before the court having jurisdiction, namely, Transport Magistrate/J.M.F.C./ S.D.J.M. for adjudication of the VCR within fifteen days from the date on which compounded fine was to be paid. The Transport Magistrate/ JMFC/SDJM may allow compounding of the offences, strictly in conformity with the Gazattee Notification No. No.1151 dated 29.09.1995. As prescribed under Rule 139 of C.M.V. Rules, 1989, the owners/driver/conductor may also send Xerox coy of R.C./I.C./Permit/D.L. and any other relevant documents duly attested by Police Officer or any other officer to the officer who demanded the documents by registered post within fifteen days from the date of issue of VCR.

xx x xx x x "

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the parties and taking into account the judgment

passed in the case of Anjana Babulal (supra), this Writ

Petition is disposed of directing the Opposite Party No.2 to

transmit the V.C.Rs under Annexure-2 series in respect of

vehicle No. OR-07-P-3737 to the court of learned J.M.F.C.

(Transport) Cuttack for disposal as per law.

8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Digitally Signed                                                      Judge







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter