Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banajyostna Mallick vs Binod Bihari Dalai ....... Opposite ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2465 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2465 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2025

Orissa High Court

Banajyostna Mallick vs Binod Bihari Dalai ....... Opposite ... on 6 August, 2025

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
                  TRP(C) No.128 of 2023

     Banajyostna Mallick        .......            Petitioner

                              -Versus-
     Binod Bihari Dalai         .......          Opposite Party


            Advocate for the parties

            For Petitioner                :   Mr. P.K. Kundu,
                                              Advocate

            For Opposite Party            :   Mr. A.K. Jena,
                                              Advocate

                           ...................

        CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA


       Date of Hearing and Judgment : 06.08.2025
_____________________________________________________________
S.K. MISHRA, J.

1. This transfer petition has been filed by the

Petitioner-Wife, for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.315 of

2022, preferred by the Opposite Party-Husband under

Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the

Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack on the

grounds detailed therein.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer

petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits, the

Petitioner is a destitute lady. After her desertion she is

staying with her parents at Village- Jampada, under Niali

Police Station, in the district of Cuttack. She is having a

minor daughter, who is only four years old. The Opposite

Party-Husband has intentionally filed the application to

dissolve the marriage in the Court of learned Judge, Family

Court, Kendrapara to cause inconvenience, harassment and

irreparable loss to her so also her minor daughter. Because

of her financial stringency, it would be difficult on her part

to attend the proceeding in C.P. No.315 of 2022 at

Kendrapara, which is around 100 K.M. away from the place,

where she is residing at present. She being an unemployed

lady having no source of income to bear the cost of

travelling, it would not be possible on her part to travel

such a long distance with her minor daughter on each and

every date to attend the proceeding in C.P. No.315 of 2022

at Kendrapara.

4. Apart from that she has a threat to her life so also

the life of her minor daughter, as because; the Opposite

Party has no emotional attachment, love and affection

towards them. When the Petitioner and her minor daughter

were residing with the Opposite Party in Kendrapara in his

residence, he attempted twice to kill her and her minor

daughter.

5. To substantiate the prayer made in the transfer

petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner relies on the

judgments of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 2002 SC

396 (Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay & anr.) and in AIR

2022 SC 4318 (N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana

Karthik Sha) .

6. Though no written objection has been filed

opposing to such prayer for transfer, per contra, learned

Counsel for the Opposite Party-Husband submits, the

Petitioner has filed D.V. Misc. Case No.74 of 2023, which is

now pending before JMFC (Rural), Cuttack. On being

noticed, his client has appeared in the said case. Being

directed by the said Court, the Opposite Party-Husband is

paying Rs.5,000/- every month towards interim

maintenance to the Petitioner-Wife. Thus, she will be able to

bear her traveling and other legal expenses to attend the

proceeding at Kendrapara.

7. He further submits, in view of the facility of Video

Conference available in the Court of learned Judge, Family

Court, Kendrapara, she can very well appear through

virtual mode, if she so desires. There is no need to travel to

attend the Court proceeding in C.P. No.315 of 2022 at

Kendrapara.

8. As has been admitted by the learned Counsel for

the Opposite Party-Husband, D.V. Misc. Case No.74 of 2023

is now pending in the Court of JMFC (Rural), Cuttack,

wherein the Opposite Party has entered appearance and

contesting the said case at Cuttack.

9. In Anindita Das Vs. Srijit Das, reported in (2006)

9 Supreme Court Cases, the Supreme Court observed as

follow:-

"Even otherwise, it must be seen that at one stage this Court was showing leniency to ladies. But since then it has been found that a large number of transfer petitions are filed by women taking advantage of the leniency shown by this Court. On an average at least 10 to 15 transfer petitions are on board of each court on each admission day. It is, therefore, clear that leniency of this Court is being misused by the women."

10. In view of the admitted facts on record so also

submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties

and the settled position of law, this Court is inclined to

allow the prayer made in the transfer petition. The Judge,

Family Court, Kendrapara is directed to transmit the case

record in C.P. No.315 of 2022 to the Court of Judge, Family

Court, Cuttack at the earliest, preferably within a period of

one week from the date of production of certified copy of

this order.

11. On receiving the case record in C.P. No.315 of

2022 from the Court of Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara,

the Judge, Family Court, Cuttack shall re-register the said

case, if so required, and proceed further in accordance with

law giving due opportunity to both the parties.

12. The Judge, Family Court, Cuttack is requested to

explore the facilities of Video Conferencing available in the

said Court and permit the parties to appear before him

through virtual mode following due procedure, as

prescribed under the Orissa High Court Video Conferencing

for Courts Rules, 2020. However, on the dates of effective

hearing i.e. for examination and cross-examination of

witnesses and other purposes, for which their presence may

be required by the Court and if it is so ordered, the parties

shall remain physically present before the Judge, Family

Court, Cuttack.

13. To avoid delay, both the parties are directed to

make a query themselves from the Court of learned Judge,

Family Court, Cuttack regarding the date and purpose of

posting of C.P. No.315 of 2022 and participate in the said

proceeding.

14. Both the parties are also directed not to ask for

unnecessary adjournments and cooperate with the Judge,

Family Court, Cuttack, who shall do well to conclude the

said proceeding at the earliest.

15. The Judge, Family Court, Cuttack is directed to

proceed further in C.P. No.315 of 2022 in accordance with

law and try to conclude the said proceeding at the earliest,

preferably within a period of six months from the date of

receipt of the record in C.P. No.315 of 2022 from the Court

of Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara.

16. With the said observation and direction, the

transfer petition stands disposed of.

17. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this

order to the Court of Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara so

also the Judge, Family Court, Cuttack for compliance.

18. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on

proper application as per rules.

...............................

S.K. MISHRA, J.

Orissa High Court, Cuttack.

Dated, 6th August, 2025/ Banita

Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI

Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 08-Aug-2025 16:34:13

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter