Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjuna Kar vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party
2024 Latest Caselaw 16139 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16139 Ori
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024

Orissa High Court

Arjuna Kar vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 4 November, 2024

Author: V. Narasingh

Bench: V. Narasingh

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                              BLAPL No. 7932 of 2024

                 Arjuna Kar                ....             Petitioner
                                                Mr. B. Jalli, Advocate

                                     -versus-

             State of Odisha               ....        Opposite Party
                                                  Mr. S. Panda, ASC

                          CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

                                    ORDER

04.11.2024 Order No.

08. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with T.R. Case No.346 of 2022 pending on the file of learned 2nd A.D.J., BBSR, arising out of Khandagiri P.S. Case No.458 of 2022 for commission of offence alleged under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act read with Section 25 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court.

4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar by order dated 26.07.2024 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

5. This is the second journey of the Petitioner to this Court. Earlier bail application of the Petitioner was disposed of by order dated 21.03.2024 in BLAPL No.3536 of 2023.

6. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is in custody since 06.09.2022 on the accusation of being involved in the transportation of contraband to the tune of 100Kgs (ganja).

7. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by order dated 21.03.2024 while not entertaining the bail application of the Petitioner along with the co- accused, this Court had given liberty to renew the prayer before the learned Court in seisin post examination of independent witnesses.

8. Admittedly the independent witnesses are yet to be examined.

9. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile the co-accused Subash Kumar Swain has since been released on bail by order dated 19.06.2024 in BLAPL No.5537 of 2024. Hence, on the ground of parity, the Petitioner seeks release and it is stated that the said co-accused had criminal proclivity.

10. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the present Petitioner has been cited as an accused in the following cases.

i) Jankia P.S case No-159,dt-03.07.2013.U/S- 395/397/454 IPC/r.w Sec-25/27 Arms Act.

ii) Infocity P.S case No-55, dt-02.07.2013, U/S-379 IPC,

iii)Chandaka P.S case No-41/20, U/S-

294/307/323/324/326/506/34 IPC/r.w sec- 25/27 arms Act,

iv) Buguda P.S case No-84, dt-08.04.2020, U/S-120-B/302 IPC/r.w sec-25(1-B)(a)/27 Arms Act/r.w sec-3(2)(v)/3(2)(va) Sc &ST Act,

v) STF, CB, Cuttack case No-15, dt. 11.03.2020, U/S-21(c) NDPS Act.

11. So far as criminal antecedent of the co- accused Subash Kumar Swain is concerned, it is brought to the notice of this Court that he was involved in Khurda P.S. Case No.168 dated 15.05.2006 under Sections 294/354/379/452/34 of IPC.

12. Referring to the same learned counsel for the State submits that parity cannot have a mechanical application and merely because the co-accused has been released, nature of criminal antecedents of the Petitioner cannot be over looked.

13. This Court finds force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the State. And, taking into account the nature of criminal antecedents as quoted above, the rigors of Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of NDPS Act and keeping in view the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Kajad reported in (2001) 7 SCC 673 and order of the Apex Court in the case of State by the Inspector of Police vs. B. Ramu in SLP(Crl.) No(s).8137 of 2022 dated 12.02.2024, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application of the Petitioner at this stage.

14. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to renew his prayer before the learned Court in seisin after examination of independent witnesses as stated in the earlier order dated 21.03.2024.

15. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha

Designation: Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 05-Nov-2024 14:22:47

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter