Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saraswati Mahanta vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opposite ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 502 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 502 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024

Orissa High Court

Saraswati Mahanta vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opposite ... on 9 January, 2024

Author: A.K. Mohapatra

Bench: A.K. Mohapatra

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                 W.P.(C) No.127 of 2024

                 Saraswati Mahanta                      ....              Petitioner
                                                          Mr. S.K.Mishra,Advocate

                                             -versus-

                 State of Odisha & others               ....        Opposite Parties
                                                                 Mr. N.K.Praharaj,
                                                                           A.G.A.


                                         CORAM:

                              JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
                                        ORDER

09.01.2024 Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the Writ Petition as well as the documents annexed thereto.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

"In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that in the interest of justice this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to;

i) Admit the writ Application.

ii) Call for the records.

iii) Direct to the opposite parties to appoint to petitioner in a suitable post persunat to the application dtd. 08.12.2014 under Annexure-3 Series to the writ application under the provision laid down in the Odisha Civil Service (rehabilitation Assitance Scheme) Rules, 1990 with the amended Rules-2016.

// 2 //

iv) Direct to the Opposite Parties to consider the case of the petitioner as per the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court on dated 24.08.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.14945 of 2015 Khirabdi Bala Behera Vrs. State and others and Basanti Nayak in W.P.C.(OAC) No.2669 of 2008 on dated 27.10.2022 with all service benefits within a stipulated period And/or pass any other appropriate order/orders, direction/directions as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice."

4. Being aggrieved by inaction of the opposite parties in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground on the O.C.S. (RA) Rules, 1990, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the father of the present petitioner, who was on ex Government employee died in harness on 25.03.2005. Thereafter the present petitioner, being one of the legal heirs and married daughter of the deceased Government employee, applied for appointment on compassionate ground. Such application of the petitioner having not been considered by the opposite parties expeditiously the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the opposite parties to consider the application of the petitioner under the O.C.S.(RA) Rules, 1990 within a stipulated period of time in the light of the judgment of this Court in Khirabdi Bala Behera V. state of Odisha and others in W.P.(C) No.14945 of 2015 as well as Basanti Nayak V. State of Odisha in WPC(OAC) No. 2669 of 2008 decided on 27.10.2022.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate on the other hand contended that in the event the application of the petitioner is still pending before the authorities they have no objection of this Court // 3 //

directs opposite party Nos.3 and 4 to consider the application of the petitioner under Annexure-2, if the same is still pending before the opposite party No.3 and 4 for consideration, to considered in accordance with law and within a stipulated period of time.

6. Considering such submissions made by learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, on a careful examination of the background facts, and on an analysis of the legal position in the present case, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the writ application by directing the Opposite Party No.3 and 4 to consider the application of the petitioner under Annexure-3 to the writ application taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in Khirabdi Bala Behera's case supra and Basanti Naik's case supra and dispose of the application of the petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of communication of certified copy of this order. Further, any final decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner within ten days thereafter.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Rubi

Location: High Court of Orissa

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter