Pravakar Digal vs State Of Odisha And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 14639 Ori

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                  W.P.(C) No.36726 of 2023

                 Pravakar Digal                           ....             Petitioner
                                                         Mr. R.N. Behera, Advocate

                                              -versus-

                 State of Odisha and others               ....          Opp. Parties
                                                          Mr. Nikhil Pratap, A.S.C.


                                      CORAM:
                              JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
                                        ORDER

Order No.                              15.11.2023
    01.     1.      This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
            /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State- Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as the documents annexed thereto.

3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with a prayer to set aside the letter/order dated 13.05.2014 passed by the Opposite Party No.3-Additional District Magistrate, Kandhamal, Phulbani under Annexure-7 to the writ petition with a further prayer to direct the Opposite Party No.3 to give him appointment under the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 within a stipulated period of time.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the father of the Petitioner, namely, Sudarsan Digal, who was working as an Peon in the office of Tahasildar, Khajuripada in the district of // 2 //

Kandhamal, died in harness on 24.07.2013. Thereafter, the Petitioner being the legal heir of his deceased father submitted an application through prescribed format along with relevant documents for appointment under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme within stipulated time before the authority concerned. Further, it is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the application of the Petitioner has been rejected by the authorities by the impugned letter/order dated 13.05.2014 under Annexure-7 to the writ petition. In this context, learned counsel for the Petitioner relies upon the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Malaya Nanda Sethy vrs. State of Orissa and others, reported in 2022(II) OLR(SC)- 1 and State of West Bengal -v.- Debabrata Tiwri, reported in 2023 (3) SCALE-557 as well as the judgments by a Division Bench of this Court in Suchitra Bal v. State of Odisha & Ors. (W.P.(C) No.2081 of 2021 decided on 16.03.2023) and in Bindusagar Samantaray v. State of Odisha & Ors. (W.A. No.810 of 2021 decided on 25.09.2023). Relying the aforesaid judgments, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the application of the Petitioner needs to be considered in the light of the judgments rendered by this Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State- Opposite Parties, on the other hand, submits that he has no objection, if a direction is given to the authorities to consider the grievance petition of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the writ petition at the stage of admission by setting aside // 3 //

the impugned order dated 13.05.2014 passed by the Opposite Party No.3 under Annexure-7 to the writ petition and further remand the matter back to the Opposite Party No.3 to consider the application of the Petitioner afresh in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Malaya Nanda Sethy's case (supra), Debabrata Tiwari's case (supra), Suchitra Bal's case and Bindusagar Samantaray's case (supra) and the Petitioner is directed to approach the Opposite Party No.3 along with certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. On appearance of the Petitioner, Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to consider the case of the Petitioner and dispose of the matter by passing a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Any decision so taken on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of ten days thereafter.

7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Debasis

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CUTTACK.

Date: 18-Nov-2023 14:54:18