Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parbati Swain And Others vs Union Of India
2023 Latest Caselaw 8496 Ori

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8496 Ori
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023

Orissa High Court
Parbati Swain And Others vs Union Of India on 3 August, 2023
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                      FAO No.227 of 2021
                 Parbati Swain and Others                  ....         Appellants
                                               Ms. Deepali Mohapatra, Advocate
                                             -versus-
                 Union of India, represented through its
                 General Manager, East Coast Railway,
                 Bhubaneswar                               ....      Respondents
                                       Ms. J. Sahu, Central Government Counsel


                            CORAM:
                            SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

                                           ORDER

3.8.2023 Order No.

02. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard Ms. D. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the claimant - Appellants and Ms. J. Sahu, learned Central Government Counsel for Respondent - Union of India.

3. Present appeal by the claimants is directed against impugned judgment dated 16th July, 2021 of the Member (Technical), Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar passed in OA (IIU)/127/2018, wherein the tribunal has refused to grant any compensation in favour of the claimants by disbelieving their case.

4. The case of the claimants is that the deceased -Siba Swain while travelling in Angul-Puri Passenger train from Lingaraj Temple Road station to Delanga on 12th June 2018 fell down at Lingaraj

Temple Road Station from the running train and died at the spot. It is the specific averment of the claimants that the deceased had the valid journey ticket bearing No.69532 dated 12th June, 2018.

5. It is seen that one witness each from the side of claimants and Railways were examined. Besides the oral evidence, the copies of police enquiry report, inquest report, post mortem examination report, etc. were also adduced in evidence from the side of the claimants and the Railways have produced the statutory report of DRM in addition to the same.

6. The tribunal has disbelieved the contention of the claimants stating that stray finding of ticket or location of dead body from the track did not bring clinching evidence regarding death of the deceased in an untoward incident and therefore, rejected the claim for compensation.

7. The admitted circumstances remain that journey ticket bearing No.69532 dated 12th June, 2018 was found from possession of the dead body at the time of inquest and the dead body was found in the up railway track by GRP personnel at KM No.440/27/A near Lingaraj Temple Road PH. The train left Lingaraj Temple Road PH at 9.29 hours and the GRP personnel saw the dead body at around 11.15 hours. Further, according to the post mortem examination report there was fracture of maxilla and skull into pieces, deep lacerated wounds over right side forehead and other injuries. As per opinion of the doctor such injuries are consistent with railway accident.

8. It is the statement of A.W.1, the witness adduced from the side of the claimants that, he had been to Lingaraj Temple Road PH along with the deceased to see off him and the deceased went inside the station and purchased the journey ticket. This part of the evidence of A.W.1 has been disbelieved by the tribunal without any reason and the witness adduced from the side of railways has never denied recovery of journey ticket from possession of the dead body. Thus, the circumstances as stated above including the injuries sustained by the deceased coupled with recovery of his dead body from the railway track justify the contentions of the claimants regarding death of the deceased in an untoward incident. It needs to be mentioned here that R.W.1 being an RPF personnel did not have any direct knowledge about the incident to rebut the evidence of A.W.1 or the circumstances so established regarding death of the deceased due to accidental fall from running train.

9. Thus in the opinion of this court, the claimants have successfully established their case regarding death of the deceased involving an untoward incident while travelling in Angul-Puri passenger train and the claimants being the wife and children of the deceased are entitled for compensation as per scheduled amount.

10. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment is set aside. The Respondent - Union of India is directed to pay compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- (eight lakhs) to the claimants along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accident, within a period of four months from today. The entire compensation amount including interest shall be disbursed in favour of the claimant -

Appellants in equal share by keeping 50% of the shares fall due to each claimant in separate fixed deposits in their names respectively, in any nationalized bank for a period of six years.

11. The copies of documents and evidences produced by Ms. Mohapatra in course of hearing are kept on record.

( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Senior Steno

Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 10-Aug-2023 18:01:24

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter