Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10057 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 23724 of 2014
Dhurba Charan Ojha & Others ..... Petitioners
Mr. B. B. Bahali, Adv.
Vs.
State of Orissa and others ..... Opposite Parties
Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
25.08.2023 Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
04.
2. Heard Mr. B.B. Bahali, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite parties.
3. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking to quash the notice of show cause dated 15.05.2014 under Annexure-3 series issued by the Odisha State Housing Board, and to issue direction to the opposite parties to settle the land in favour of the petitioners within a stipulated time.
4. Mr. B.B. Bahali, learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are in occupation of the land for more than 30 years and, therefore, the same can be settled in favour of the petitioner. It is further contended that though the petitioner approached the authority for settlement of the land, but it has been brought to the notice of the petitioner that the land has been transferred to the Odisha State Housing Board. As a consequence thereof, the notice of show cause dated 15.05.2014 has been issued by the Odisha State Housing Board to the
petitioners under Annexure-3 series for eviction. It is contended that the petitioners are willing to occupy the land on settlement and whatever amount will be determined by the authority, the petitioners are willing to deposit the same instead of facing eviction.
5. Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the State-opposite parties, on the other hand, contended that the land in question has already been allotted to Odisha State Housing Board. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioners can only be considered by the Board with regard to land occupied by the petitioners, but not the State Government.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court finds that the petitioner is in occupation of the land for more than 30 years, as stated by learned counsel for the petitioners, and, as such, the petitioners are interested to settle the land, which has not yet been done. As such, in the meantime, the State Government has already transferred the land in favour of Odisha State Housing Board. Therefore, it is open to the petitioners to approach the Odisha State Housing Board for settlement of the land on the basis of premium fixed by the Board. Needless to say, similar question had come up for consideration before this Court in W.P.(C) No. 13965 of 1999, W.P.(C) No. 13222 of 2005 and W.P.(C) No. 4338 of 2002 and all those writ petitions were heard analogously and disposed of by the common judgment dated 21.07.2008, wherein this Court observed that since the Government has allotted the land to the Housing Board, it is open to the Housing Board to consider the grievance of the petitioners and to take a decision for allotment of the land to the association in accordance with law within a period of four
months.
7. In the above view of the matter, since similar matters have already been disposed of, this writ petition stands disposed of directing Odisha State Housing Board to consider the grievance of the petitioners and take a decision for allotment of the land to the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN) Laxmikant JUDGE
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Aug-2023 09:59:21
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!