Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3166 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.644 of 2007
Divisional Manager, National .... Appellant
Insurance Company Ltd.
Mr. N.C. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Buli Bewa and another .... Respondents
Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate for Respondent No.1
.
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
11.04.2023 Order No.
09. 1. Heard Mr. N.C. Mishra, learned counsel for the Appellant-
Insurance Company as well as Mr. S. Mohanty, learned counsel for Respondent No.1-claimant.
2. Present appeal by the insurer is directed against the judgment dated 31.01.2007 of learned 3rd M.A.C.T., Puri in M.A.C. No.230/104 of 1997/1997, wherein compensation to the tune of Rs.2,00,000/- has been granted along with interest @7.5% per annum to the claimant from the date of filing of the claim application, i.e.11.3.1997 on account of death of the deceased in the motor vehicular accident dated 19.2.1997.
3. It is contended by Mr. N.C. Mishra, learned counsel for the Appellant that the income of the deceased has been taken on higher side and the amount paid towards "No Fault Liability" has not been adjusted from the compensation amount.
4. The date of accident is 19.2.1997 and the deceased was 55 years old at the time of accident. The learned Tribunal has assessed his income at Rs.3000/- as a carpenter and determined loss of dependency by applying multiplier '8'. No future prospect was also added to the income of the deceased. However, in absence of challenge from the side of the claimants, this Court is though not inclined to enter into such disputes, but considering the plight of the claimant, the amount of compensation is enhanced by the amount paid towards 'No Fault Liability'.
5. The contention of Mr. Mishra to reduce income of the deceased is not found convincing keeping in view the undisputed profession of the deceased as a carpenter in the year 1997. The fact of payment of Rs.50,000/- along with interest towards "No Fault Liability" to the claimant during pendency of the claim application is not disputed by Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for Respondent No.1. But the prayer of the insurer for adjusting the same from the compensation amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as directed by the learned Tribunal is not accepted for the reasons that the Tribunal while computing the compensation amount has counted lesser amount. For the reasons stated at paragraph-4 above in favour of the claimant, it is clarified that the amount paid towards "No Fault Liability" is treated over and above the compensation amount directed to be paid by learned Tribunal. However, the rate of interest is reduced to '6%'.
6. In the result, the Appellant - Insurance Company is directed to deposit the compensation amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs) before the Tribunal along with interest @6% per annum
from the date of filing of the claim application, i.e.11.3.1997 within a period of two months from today; where-after the same shall be disbursed in favour of the claimant-Respondent No.1 on such terms and proportion to be decided by the Tribunal.
7. On deposit of the award amount before learned Tribunal and filing of a receipt evidencing the deposit with a refund application before this Court, the statutory deposit made before this Court with accrued interest thereon shall be refunded to the Appellant- Insurance Company.
8. The MACA is disposed of with aforesaid directions.
9. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!