Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6280 Ori
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 26479 of 2022
Akshaya Kumar Panda ..... Petitioner
Mr. J. Gupta, Advocate,
Vs.
State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Jena, SC, S&ME Deptt.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
02.11.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect within three days.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.1 to take immediate step for disbursement of the differential arrear keeping in view the ratio decided in the case Smt. Dipti Roy v. State of Orissa and others, 2004 (II) OLR 718.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, keeping in view the ratio decided in Smt. Dipti Roy (supra), to which learned Standing Counsel for School & Mass Education Department has no objection.
5. As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 taking into consideration the judgment in the case of Dipti Roy (supra), in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!