Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sudesh Bhardwaj vs The Presiding Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 2766 Ori

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2766 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Orissa High Court
Sudesh Bhardwaj vs The Presiding Officer on 20 May, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                          W.P.(C) No.17193 of 2013

            Sudesh Bhardwaj                ....       Petitioner
                                 Mr. L.N. Rayatsingh, Advocate

                                  -versus-

            The Presiding Officer, Debts
            Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack
            and another                  ....       Opp. Parties

                       Mr. D.P. Sarangi, Advocate for the Bank


                         CORAM:
                         JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
                        JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

                                   ORDER (Oral)

Order No. 20.05.2022

11. 1. This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.

2. Petitioner had availed a cash credit loan in the year 2001 from State Bank of India, Barbil Branch, Orissa and another term loan on 01.04.2008 for the purpose of buying Tata Tipper Trucks, as he is engaged in the business of transportation. On account of default in servicing the loan account, the Bank filed an O.A. No.36 of 2012 for recovery of ₹97,75,299.00 along with interest, cost and other expenses. The notice of the O.A. was duly served upon the Petitioner and after his counsel had appeared on few dates, chose to abstain // 2 //

from the proceedings. Resultantly, the order is to be proceeded against as ex-parte vide order dated 06.09.2012. Subsequently, the DRT, Cuttack passed the impugned ex-parte judgment dated 20.12.2012, which has been impugned in the present writ.

3. Perusal of the previous order reveals that after the mortgaged properties are sold in public auction, the sale proceeds have been adjusted towards the outstanding amounts, another sum of ₹69 lakhs was found to be still outstanding as on 12.01.2018.

4. At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for unconditional withdrawal of the present writ petition.

5. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge

(M. S. Raman) Judge

May 20th, 2022 Cuttack AKPradhan

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter