Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1781 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 33480 of 2011
Panchanana Laxman ..... Petitioner
Murmu
Mr. J.M. Pattanaik,
Advocate
Vs.
Union of India & Ors. ..... Opposite parties
Mr. B. Dash, CGC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
11.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. J.M. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Dash, learned Central Government Counsel.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition assailing the order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.75 of 2008 and batch holding that the decision of the Full Bench shall govern the issues raised in the aforesaid O.As.
4. Mr. J.M. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi while disposing of O.A. No. 1830 of 2009 and batch vide order dated 03.01.2011 held that since the judgment of Hyderabad Bench has already been overruled and it has already been
held that SC/ST candidates who qualify the departmental examination with relaxed standards would not be eligible for promotion against unreserved vacancies, nothing more remains to be adjudicated upon. It is further contended that the said order is the subject matter of challenge before various High Courts. Therefore, he has no instructions in the matter.
5. Put up this matter after one week. Instructions, if any, shall be obtained in the meantime.
Alok /sukanta ...........................
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
..................................... (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!