Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3267 Ori
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17192 Of 2022
(Through hybrid mode)
M/s. Mesco Hotels Ltd. .... Petitioner
Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
Bijay Kumar Mohapatra and others .... Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order 13.07.2022 No. 1. 1. Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner
and submits, his client seeks interference with execution proceeding
and order dated 26th April, 2022 directing, inter alia, vacation of the
building on plot no.3915 and to put same to public auction for
realization of dues of decree holder (opposite party no.1). He submits,
opposite party no.2 is judgment debtor. His client and opposite party
no.2 are different entities. Execution of the decree has been directed
against his client's property. His client had applied to be added as
party in the execution proceeding. By impugned order dated 26th
April, 2022 the executing Court said, in case his client is a separate
entity, it may proceed under different procedure to establish right over
the property subject to execution. Immediately thereupon, on 27th
// 2 //
April, 2022 his client had filed application under Order XXI Rule 99,
Code of Civil Procedure.
2. There is no averment in the writ petition, presented on 11th
July, 2022 that the application under Order XXI Rule 99 was moved
before the executing Court. Petitioner is directed to forthwith move
said Court by producing this order.
3. With above observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!