Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1625 Mani
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2026
Item No. 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 195 of 2026
Tongbram Subhash Singh & Anr.
...Petitioners
- Versus -
State of Manipur & 2 Ors.
...Respondents
B EF O R E
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
ORDER
13-03-2026
[1] Heard Mrs. N. Savitri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners as Legal Aid Counsel.
[2] By the present petition, the petitioners are praying for directions to
the respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 68,00,000/- as compensation to the
petitioners for the lost and destruction of their entire house and machinery
during the Manipur violence and to consider the representation dated 11-08-
2025 addressed to the Commissioner (Home), Government of Manipur
within a time bound period.
[3] Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the
State respondents, submits that the petitioners have submitted the
representation not in the format prescribed in this regard and during the
course of hearing, he undertakes to handover a copy of the prescribed
format to the learned counsel for the petitioners.
[4] Mrs. N. Savitri, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that
the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by directing the
respondents to dispose of the pending representation dated 11-08-2025
addressed to the Deputy Commissioner (Home), Government of Manipur.
[5] Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the
State respondents, submits that the representation may be in the prescribed
format.
[6] Recording the submissions made at the Bar, the present writ
petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to submit a
representation in the prescribed format before the Deputy Commissioner,
Jiribam. The petitioners are permitted to submit a new representation to the
Deputy Commissioner, Jiribam in the prescribed format within a period of
one week and the competent authority shall consider the new representation
and also the contents of the earlier representation dated 11-08-2025 and
pass a speaking order as per rules and admissible scheme within a period
of three months from the date of receipt of a fresh representation from the
petitioners.
[7] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on
the merit of the case.
JUDGE
Victoria
NINGOM Digitally signed
by NINGOMBAM
BAM VICTORIA
Date: 2026.03.13
VICTORIA 17:34:04 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!