Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 387 Mani
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026
Digitally
Lucy signed by Lucy
Gurumayum
Gurum Date: Item Nos. 33
2026.02.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
ayum 15:18:49
+05'30' AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 300 of 2025
Oinam Indubala Devi
...Petitioner/s
Vrs.
Union of India & 2 Ors
...Respondent/s
-B E F O R E-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
06.02.2026
[1] Heard Mr. B. Prem Sharma, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner and Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned Sr. PCCG
appearing for the respondents.
[2] At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that the present writ petition may be disposed
of by directing the Director, Regional Institute of Medical Science
(RIMS) to consider the representation dated 16.09.2017 submitted
by the petitioner in on its merit and strictly in terms of the
applicable rules/guidelines and to disposed of the same by issuing
a speaking order within a stipulated period.
[3] Mr. S. Vijayanand, learned Sr. PCCG appearing for the
respondents fairly submitted that as the prayer made on behalf of Page 1 the petitioner is confine to the consideration and disposal of the
representation submitted by the petitioner, he has no objection in
disposing of the present writ petition as prayed for on behalf of the
petitioner.
[4] Considering the submission made by the learned
counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the considered
view that it will be in the interest of justice to issue the following
directions;
(i) The Director, RIMS is hereby directed to
consider the representation dated 16.09.2017
submitted by the petitioner on its own merit
and strictly in terms of applicable
rules/guidelines and to dispose of the same
by issuing a speaking order.
(ii) The whole process should be completed
within a period of two months from the date
of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(iii) The Director, RIMS is also directed to furnish
a copy of the order passed by him in
Page 2 connection with the said representation to the
petitioner as early as possible.
(iv) It is made cleared that the aforesaid direction
has been issued without considering the merit
of the present writ petition.
[5] With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition
is disposed of.
JUDGE
Lucy
Page 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!