Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 56 Mani
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2025
Digitally signed by
KHOIROM KHOIROM
BIPINCHAN BIPINCHANDRA
SINGH
DRA SINGH Date: 2025.07.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
18:00:01 +05'30'
MC(WA) No. 65 of 2025
Soibam Premkuamr Singh & 9 Ors.
... Applicants
- Versus -
Md. Fazlur Rahman & 5 Ors.
... Respondents
B E F O R E
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K. SOMASHEKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
O R D E R
[K. Somashekar, CJ] 10.07.2025
[1] The present miscellaneous case has been filed by the
applicants under Order 1 Rule 8A read with Section 151 of CPC, whereby
the applicants are seeking for allowing them to intervene in the writ appeal
as interveners for proper adjudication of the matter in between the parties
in the rank of proceeding.
[2] This application is consisting all the contentions made by the
learned senior counsel for the applicants and also the learned Advocate
General, Mr. Lenin Hijam that by the common judgment and order dated
18.04.2023, the writ petitions were disposed of by the Ld. Single Judge by
directing the respondents authorities to allow the elected representatives of
Gram Panchayats to function through their respective posts and Zila
Parishads of 6 (six) districts namely, Bishnupur, Imphal East, Imphal West,
Jiribam, Kakching and Thoubal and to function through their elected
representatives till the election notification of the same is issued like the
cases of 27 urban local bodies as per the order dated 19.01.2023 in W.P.(C)
No. 935 of 2022 and connected cases.
Page 1|2 [3] The writ petitions have been initiated by the writ petitioners
against the respondents which is also indicated in the same contentions
which have been taken in the aforesaid. The proceeding has been initiated
for seeking for allowing the applications for interventions and permitting the
applicants to assist this Court during the proceeding of W.A. No. 11 of 2024
for proper adjudicating the case.
[4] Learned senior counsel for the respondents, Mr. N. Jotendro;
learned senior counsel for the applicants, Mr. S. Biswajit in presence of
learned Advocate General, Mr. Lenin Hijam and inclusive of learned senior
counsel, Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar wherein the learned senior counsel in this
matter submits that the intervening application may be considered i.e.
MC(WA) No. 65 of 2025.
[5] Whereas, the application has been filed under the provision
of Order 1 Rule 8A read with Section 151 of CPC which indicates that no
limit to exercise the inherent power, either effecting or affecting any orders
under this Code, that is the first limb of the said provision of law, the second
limb of the said provision of law relating to preventing the abuse of process
of law, whereas, the third limb of the said provision of law is seeking for
securing the ends of justice.
[6] Therefore, keeping in view of the submission made by both
parties and the provision of Order 1 Rule 8A read with Section 151 of CPC,
it is deemed appropriate that the proceeding in MC(WA) No. 65 of 2025 is
hereby allowed in the interest of justice.
Accordingly, the aforesaid proceeding is hereby disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bipin
Page 2|2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!