Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 408 Mani
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024
KABORAMBA Digitally
KABORAMBAM
signed by
M SANDEEP SANDEEP SINGH
Date: 2024.09.05
SINGH 18:37:59 +05'30'
Item No. 35
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
MC (GCA) No. 2 of 2024
State of Manipur
Applicant
Vs.
Laishram Ibomcha Meitei
Respondent
BEFORE
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI
ORDER
03.09.2024 Siddharth Mridul, C.J.:
Mr. Athouba Khaidem, learned Government Advocate, appears
on behalf of the applicant; and Mr. Ch. Bimolchandra, learned counsel,
appears on behalf of the respondent.
The present application has been instituted on behalf of the State of Manipur, the applicant, praying as follows:
"In the premises stated above, your Lordship may graciously be pleased to consider the reasons and circumstances stated above as sufficient grounds for condoning the unintentional and bona-fide delay of 318 days in filing the accompanying Govt. Criminal Appeal."
At the outset, it is observed that the present appeal assails the
judgment and order dated 20.01.2023, whereby the respondent was
acquitted of charges framed against him for the commission of offence under
Sections 376 IPC & 302 IPC.
Despite opportunities, no affidavit-in-objection has been filed by
the respondent. However, it is asserted on behalf of the respondent that the
State of Manipur, the applicant herein, has been unable to demonstrate
sufficient cause for condoning the delay.
MC (GCA) No. 2 of 2024 Page 1 Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
parties and in terms of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State
(NCT OF DELHI) Vrs. Ahmed Jaan, reported as (2008) 14 SCC 582 and
in particular paragraph 13 thereof; as well as the decision of the 3(three)
Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Manipur & ors. Vrs.
Koting Lamkang, reported as (2019) 10 SCC 408 and in particular
paragraph 8 thereof; since the proceedings instituted on behalf of the State
are not personal to its officers and the paramount consideration is that
institutional interest ought not to suffer by resorting to technicalities of delay
to defeat hearing on merits; the delay of 318 days in filing the accompanying
Govt. criminal appeal is condoned.
The present application filed for condonation of delay is allowed
and accordingly disposed of.
Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise found
to be in order, and list the same for admission.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sandeep MC (GCA) No. 2 of 2024 Page 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!