Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 310 Mani
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2022
SHAMURAILAT
Page |1
PAM SUSHIL IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
SHARMA AT IMPHAL
Digitally signed by WP(C) No. 724 of 2019
SHAMURAILATPAM
SUSHIL SHARMA Hockey Manipur, a registered amalgamated Society,
Date: 2022.07.21 registered under the Manipur Societies Registration Act,
10:03:46 +05'30' 1989 having registration No. 419/M/SR/2010 having its
registered office at Khuman Lampak, P.O. and P.S.
Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur, through its
General Secretary, Shri Th. Manihar, aged about 56
years, S/o (L) Th. Herachandra Singh, a resident of
Kongba Kshetri Leikai, Manipur.
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Manipur represented by the
Commissioner / Secretary (Co-operation),
Government of Manipur, Office at Secretariat,
Babupara, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, Imphal West District,
Manipur-795001.
2. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Manipur,
Office at Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, Imphal
West District, Manipur-795004.
3. The Manipur Hockey bearing Regd. No.
402/M/SR/2009 having its registered address at
Imphal, represented by its President Shri Basudev
Singh, a resident of Thangal Bazar P.O. Imphal &
P.S. City, Imphal West District, Manipur-795001.
.... Official Respondents.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |2
WP(C) No. 916 of 2019
The Manipur Hockey represented by its President Shri Basudev Singh, aged about 60 years, S/o Late Ganesh Singh, resident of Thangal Bazar P.O. Imphal & P.S. City, Imphal West District, Manipur.
... Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Manipur represented by the Principal Secretary (Co-Op), Govt. of Manipur, Manipur Secretariat, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, District: Imphal West, Manipur-795001.
2. The Registrar of Societies, Govt. of Manipur at Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, District : Imphal West, Manipur-795002.
3. The Hockey Manipur represented by its General Secretary, Shri Th. Manihar, S/o (L) Th. Herachandra Singh, a resident of Kongba Kshetri Leikai, Manipur.
.... Respondents.
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.V. MURALIDARAN
For the Petitioners :: Mr. M. Hemchandra, Sr. Adv. in WP(C) No. 724 of 2019;
Mr. HS Paonam, Sr. Advocate in WP(C) No. 916 of 2019
For the Respondents :: Mr. Athouba Khaidem, GA
Date of Hearing and Reserving Judgment & Order :: 16.06.2022
Date of Judgment & Order :: 20.07.2022
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |3
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (CAV)
W.P. (C) No.724 of 2019 has been filed to issue a
writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to
implement/execute the order dated 22.1.2018 issued by the
Secretary (Cooperation), Government of Manipur and letter
dated 14.1.2019 issued by the Registrar of Societies, Manipur.
2. W.P. (C) No.916 of 2019 has been filed to issue a
writ of certiorarified mandamus for quashing the order dated
22.1.2018 directing the petitioner therein to change its name and
alter its memorandum within three months and to direct the
respondents 1 and 2 to consider and dispose of the
representation dated 29.12.2017.
3. M.C.(WP(C)) No.34 of 2022 in W.P. (C) No.916 of
2019 has been filed by the applicant to vacate the interim order
dated 13.11.2019 and its subsequent extension.
4. Since the issue involved and parties are one and
the same, both the writ petitions were heard together and
disposed of by this common order.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |4
4. The dispute pertains to registration of two societies,
namely Hockey Manipur and Manipur Hockey. Hockey Manipur
filed W.P.(C) No.724 of 2019 and Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C)
No.916 of 2019. For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as Hockey Manipur and Manipur Hockey.
5. Heard Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned senior counsel
for Hockey Manipur in WP(C) No. 724 of 2019; Mr. HS Paonam,
learned senior counsel for Manipur Hockey in WP(C) No. 916 of
2019 and Mr. Athouba Khaidem, learned Government Advocate
for the respondent State in both the writ petitions.
6. The case of Hockey Manipur is as follows:
Hockey Manipur is a registered society and has
been formed by amalgamation of two registered societies,
namely Manipur Hokey Association and Manipur Women's
Hockey Association. On 1.6.2009, the President of Indian
Olympic Association wrote a letter to the President of Manipur
Olympic Association stating that the Indian Olympic Association
has disaffiliated the Indian Hockey Federation and Indian
Women Hockey Federation and provisional affiliation has been
given to one Association, namely Hockey India. The aforesaid
letter further states that Hockey India shall work on the principle
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |5
of One Game-One Body and shall thus give recognition to one
body in each State/Union Territories to control, manage and
administer both men and women Hockey.
6.1. In the wake of formation of unified men's and
women's Hockey Association in various States of India under the
principles of one game one body, Hockey Manipur was formed
by amalgamation in a joint meeting held on 28.6.2009. On
29.6.2009, an ad-hoc committee under the name of Hockey
Manipur was constituted and consequent upon the formation of
the ad-hoc committee, the Manipur Hockey Association and
Manipur Women's Association are suspended from the
membership of the Manipur Olympic Association.
6.2. The ad-hoc committee was under the presumption
that Hockey Manipur was converted into Manipur Hockey upon
its registration with Registrar, Societies, Manipur bearing
Registration No.402/M/ST/2009. Manipur Hockey was formed
on 6.10.2009 without holding a general body meeting and it has
not fulfilled the required procedure and proper documents. Thus,
Manipur Hockey was registered on 12.11.2009 by some vested
interested persons with mala fide and ulterior motive and the
same has been done while the process for amalgamation of
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |6
Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey
Association was pending.
6.3. Upon amalgamation of the Men's and Women's
Hockey Association, the Hockey Manipur was registered with the
Registrar, Cooperative Societies bearing Registration
No.419/M/SR/2010. While the Manipur Hockey has been
registered as a new society under Section 7(1) of the Manipur
Societies Registration Act, 1989, Hockey Manipur has been
registered as an amalgamated society.
6.4. Challenging the process which are aggrieved,
Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010 before this Court
and by an order dated 17.3.2016, this Court directed the
Commissioner (Cooperation), Government of Manipur to dispose
of the representation dated 4.1.2010 within a period of two
months. Pursuant to the order dated 17.3.2016, the Principal
Secretary (Cooperation) issued an order dated 2.8.2016
directing Manipur Hockey and Hockey Manipur to reconcile and
come under a common banner within six months. Accordingly,
on 1.7.2017, the Deputy Secretary (Cooperation) issued
summon to Manipur Hockey to appear on 10.7.2017 at 11 A.M.
Challenging the summon, Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.562
of 2017 before this Court and by the order dated 19.12.2017, the
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |7
said writ petition was allowed thereby quashing the summon
dated 1.7.2017.
6.5. On 22.01.2018, the Secretary (Cooperation),
Government of Manipur passed an order directing Manipur
Hockey to change its name and alter its memorandum within
three months from the date of receipt of the order. Aggrieved by
the said order, Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018
before this Court and by the order dated 27.11.2018, this Court,
in order to find out an amicable solution, directed the Registrar of
Societies to examine and explore an amicable solution for having
one association only for which Manipur Hockey was directed to
appear before the Registrar. Accordingly, on 14.1.2019, the
Registrar of Societies passed an order declaring that Manipur
Hockey has violated the norms of registration and hence it is
illegal. On 30.8.2019, W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018 dismissed on the
ground that the writ petition has no substance for the reason of
non-joinder of necessary party. Accordingly, Hockey Manipur
filed W.P.(C) No.724 of 2019 for implementation of the order
dated 22.1.2018 and the letter dated 14.1.2019.
7. On the other hand, the case of Manipur Hockey is
as follows:
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |8
Pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held
on 6.10.2009 and after discussing and deliberating thoroughly on
the issue and in view of the advice given by the IOA to the MOA
to follow the policy of one game one association, the members of
the meeting resolved to form an association under the name and
style of Manipur Hockey for not only uplifting the game of hockey
in the State of Manipur, but also for the sake and interest of the
players, who are being deprived of their fruit of labour on account
of the mismanagement by the members administering the sport
in the State of Manipur.
7.1. After formation of Manipur Hockey, it approached
Hockey India, which is the apex body of the game in the country,
for its affiliation with them. Thereafter, after taking into account
the credentials of the members of Manipur Hockey, who are
managing the affairs of hockey in the State of Manipur, granted
affiliation of Manipur Hockey to Hockey India with effect from
22.10.2009 of the President of Hockey India. In the said letter,
Manipur Hockey was also requested to get itself registered under
the Societies Registration Act within six months and deposit the
required affiliation fee within three months from the date of the
said order.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 Page |9
7.2. In terms of the resolution taken in the meeting held
on 6.10.2009, necessary applications, documents and
registration fee required under the provisions of Manipur
Societies Registration Act, 1989 and Rules were submitted to the
Registrar of Cooperative Societies for registration of Manipur
Hockey. After completing all formalities and procedures provided
by law, the Registrar had issued a notification bearing
No.402/M/SR/09 dated 12.11.2009 notifying the registration of
Manipur Hockey under Section 7(1) of the Manipur Societies
Registration Act. After the registration, Manipur Hockey has
been controlling, managing and looking after the game of hockey
as the only authorized and recognized association by selecting
the players to represent the State and arranging for their
participation in various State level and National level hockey
tournaments. Manipur Hockey is also organizing many National
level and State level hockey tournaments right from its affiliation
and registration till date as it is the only authorized and
recognized hockey association in the State of Manipur.
7.3. Only after the registration of Manipur Hockey,
Hockey Manipur submitted an application for amalgamation of
Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey
Association to one unified body called Hockey Manipur and also
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 10
requesting for allowing the said amalgamation. After registration
of Manipur Hockey, the Secretary of Manipur Hockey submitted
the notification and certificate dated 12.11.2019 to the
Secretary/President, Manipur Olympic Association for
information and necessary action. The President of MOA issued
an order on 23.11.2009 revoking with immediate effect its earlier
order constituting an ad-hoc committee to look after the affairs of
hockey in Manipur. Though there is no provision for filing an
appeal, the President of erstwhile Manipur Women's Hockey
Association filed an appeal before the Commissioner/Secretary,
Registrar of Societies to set aside the registration granted in
favour of Manipur Hockey.
7.4. During the pendency of the appeal, the Registrar
allowed the registration of the amalgamated society called
Hockey Manipur by allotting registration No.419/M/SR/2010 and
by issuing a certificate dated 21.10.2010, thereby cancelling the
registration allotted to Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur
Women's Hockey Association with immediate effect.
Challenging the registration certificate issued in favour of
Manipur Hockey, Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010
and during the pendency of the said writ petition, the Secretary
General of Hockey India wrote a letter on 10.1.2011 to the
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 11
Director of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of Manipur
informing that Manipur Hockey is the only recognized body of
Hockey India in Manipur State, which is affiliated to Hockey India.
On 4.3.2016 the Secretary, MOA issued certificate to the effect
that Manipur Hockey is an affiliated unit of MOA.
7.5. Pursuant to the order dated 17.3.2016 passed in
W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010, the Principal Secretary (Cooperation)
passed an order on 2.8.2016 disposing of the appeal by giving
an opportunity to Manipur Hockey and Hockey Manipur to
reconcile the issue. Thereafter, the President of Manipur Hockey
wrote letters to the President, Hockey Manipur inviting them for
reconciliation and to unite the two hockey associations under the
common banner. Since no response was forthcoming from
Hockey Manipur, Manipur Hockey wrote a letter to the Secretary
General, MOA requesting for arranging an open discussion with
Hockey Manipur for merging of two hockey associations in the
larger interest of the game of hockey and the players.
7.6. It is averred that instead of making any effort for
reconciliation and merging, Hockey Association filed another
representation dated 12.4.2017 to the State government praying
for cancellation of the registration of Manipur Hockey on the
same grounds taken in their appeal dated 4.1.2010. Without
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 12
giving an opportunity to Manipur Hockey, the Principal Secretary
(Cooperation) issued an order dated 22.5.2017 cancelling the
registration of Manipur Hockey with immediate effect and also
notifying that Hockey Manipur is recognized as the sole and
genuine State level association for hockey game in the State of
Manipur.
7.7. Aggrieved by the order dated 22.5.2017, Manipur
Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.391 of 2017 for quashing of the said
order. During pendency of the said writ petition, the Principal
Secretary issued an order dated 14.6.2017 withdrawing the order
dated 22.5.2017. Just after withdrawal order dated 14.6.2017,
Hockey Manipur again for the third time filed another
representation on 27.6.2017 to the Principal Secretary praying
for cancellation of the registration of Manipur Hockey. When the
Deputy Secretary issued summon dated 1.7.2017, challenging
the summon Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.562 of 2017 and
by the order dated 19.12.2017, the said writ petition was allowed.
After the disposal of the said writ petition, Manipur Hockey filed
an application dated 29.12.2017 to the concerned authorities of
the State requesting them for directing Hockey Manipur to
change its name by invoking Section 11 as its name is exactly
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 13
similar to the name of already registered society of Manipur
Hockey.
7.8. According to Manipur Hockey, they are the only
body affiliated and recognized by the Hockey India and MOA for
the sports of hockey in the State of Manipur, which had
conducted many tournaments/coaching camps in different levels
in the State of Manipur. Instead of considering the application
dated 29.12.2017 after a delay of more than 8 years from the
date of the registration, the first respondent issued an order dated
22.1.2018 whereby Manipur Hockey was directed to change its
name within three months on the ground that at the time when
Manipur Hockey was registered on 12.11.2009, there were
already two associations existing which is alleged to be a clear
violation of Section 10 of the Act.
7.9. Aggrieved by the order dated 22.1.2018, Manipur
Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018 and the said writ petition
was dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of necessary party.
However, this Court has granted liberty to Manipur Hockey to
approach any forum, including this Court for redressal of its
grievance in accordance with law vide order dated 30.8.2019.
Thereafter, Manipur Hockey has filed W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019 to
set aside the order dated 22.1.2018.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 14
8. Mr. M. Hemchandra, the learned senior counsel for
Hockey Manipur submitted that upon amalgamation of Men's and
Women's Hockey Association, Hockey Manipur was registered
with the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Manipur, while
Manipur Hockey has been registered as a new society under
Section 7(1) of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 [for
short, "the Act of 1989"]. According to learned senior counsel,
Hockey Manipur has been registered as an amalgamated society
under Section 12 of the Act of 1989.
9. The learned senior counsel further submitted that
without following the procedures as laid down under Rule 13 of
Manipur Societies Registration Rules, 2004 [for short, "the Rules
of 2004"], Manipur Hockey was registered by the authorities. In
fact, no publication calling for any sort of objection was made at
any point of time. At the time of registration of Manipur Hockey,
Manipur Hokey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey
Association were in existence and that their registration were
never cancelled at any point of time.
10. The learned senior counsel urged that in the wake
of formation of unified Men's and Women's Hockey Association
in various States of the country under the principle of one game
one body, Hockey Manipur was formed by amalgamation of two
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 15
registered associations into one unified Hockey Association in
the meeting held on 28.6.2009. When the process for
amalgamation was underway, some interested persons
registered Manipur Hockey. He would submit that being
aggrieved by the registration of Manipur Hockey, Hockey
Manipur submitted a representation dated 4.1.2010 to the
authorities. Since the said representation has not been
considered, Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010 and
this Court by the order dated 17.3.2016 directed the
Commissioner (Cooperation) to dispose of the representation
within a period of two months.
11. The learned senior counsel next submitted that
pursuant to the order dated 17.3.2016, the Principal Secretary,
exercising the power conferred under Rule 38 of the Rules of
2004 has given an opportunity to Manipur Hockey and Hockey
Manipur to reconcile and come under a common banner within
six months in the best interest to the hockey game and players.
Accordingly, the Deputy Secretary issued summon on 1.7.2017
and challenging the summon dated 1.7.2017, Manipur Hockey
filed W.P.(C) No.562 of 2017 before this Court and by the order
dated 19.12.2017, the said writ petition was allowed. While
allowing the writ petition, this Court observed that it is open to the
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 16
State Government to proceed in accordance with law as regards
to the registration of the society pertaining to hockey sports in
Manipur keeping in mind all circumstances.
12. The learned senior counsel for Hockey Manipur
argued that in view of series of orders of this Court and
notification by the respondent authorities and also letters of the
State Government, the Secretary (Cooperation) issued an order
dated 22.1.2018, thereby directing Manipur Hockey to change its
name and alter its memorandum within three months. Despite
direction, Manipur Hockey has not changed its name. Since
Manipur Hockey has failed to change its name as per the order
dated 22.1.2018, Hockey Manipur submitted a representation on
4.9.2019 praying to implement/execute the orders dated
22.1.2018 issued by the Secretary (Cooperation). Since the
official respondents failed to take action, Hockey Manipur filed
W.P.(C) No.724 of 2019.
13. Assailing the impugned order dated 22.1.2018, Mr.
HS Paonam, the learned senior counsel for Manipur Hockey
submitted that the first respondent, in an arbitrary and mala fide
manner and in colourable exercise of power with an ulterior and
preconceived motive to cancel the registration of Manipur
Hockey, has passed the aforesaid order, that too, after more than
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 17
8 years, after Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur
Women's Hockey Association have ceased to exist with effect
form 29.6.2009 and order for amalgamation of the said two
societies was issued with effect from 21.1.2010. On the
aforesaid ground itself, the impugned order dated 22.1.2018
deserves to be quashed.
14. The learned senior counsel further submitted that
the registration of Hockey Manipur was allowed only on
21.1.2010 much later than the registration of Manipur Hockey,
which was allowed on 12.11.2009. In view of such undisputed
facts, the invocation of the provisions of Section 11 of the Act of
1989 and Rule 14(9) of the Rules of 2004 by the first respondent
against Manipur Hockey is totally ignoring the application dated
29.12.2017 submitted by Manipur Hockey. He would submit that
the impugned order dated 22.1.2018 has been passed illegally
and without any authority of law.
15. The learned senior counsel then submitted that the
order dated 22.1.2018 has been issued with a mala fide intention
to scuttle the promotion, propagation and development of the
sport of hockey in the State of Manipur in which Manipur Hockey
has been and is deeply engrossed with as will be shown by the
facts that because of its credentials it is the only recognized body
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 18
for the sport of hockey in the State of Manipur by Hockey India
which is the apex body for the sport of hockey in the country and
has been conducting championship in the State of Manipur. In
fact, the first respondent issued the impugned order dated
22.1.2018 at the instance and dictation of Hockey Manipur.
16. The learned senior counsel for Manipur Hockey
urged that the first respondent or for that matter the second
respondent has not taken any action against Hockey Manipur for
changing the name of its association or for cancellation of their
registration knowing fully well that the same is a defunct society
existing only in paper and not engaging in any activity or activities
worth its name commensurate with its aim and object for which it
was set up and registered and renewing its registration in
connivance amongst the respondents on the basis of false and
concocted documents. The respondents 1 and 2 are estopped
by their conduct from issuing the impugned order and, therefore,
interference of this Court is very much required.
17. Mr. Athouba Khaidem, the learned Government
Advocate appearing for the official respondents in both the writ
petitions submitted that Hockey Manipur was registered under
the Act of 1989 dated 21.1.2010 and it was formed by
amalgamation of two previously registered societies. He would
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 19
submit that Manipur Hockey was registered under the Act of 1989
on 12.11.2009 calling for objections through local newspaper
published on 23.10.2009 and based on the enquiry report
submitted by the enquiry officer.
18. The learned Government Advocate further
submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court dated
17.3.2016 passed in W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010, the Principal
Secretary issued an order dated 2.8.2016 giving an opportunity
to Manipur Hockey and Hockey Manipur to reconcile the issue
and come under a common banner within six months. However,
the reconciliation could not be made and after due consideration
of the issue under Section 11 of the Act of 1989 and Rule 11 of
the Rules of 2004, the Secretary (Cooperation) has passed the
impugned order dated 22.1.2018.
19. According to learned Government Advocate
Hockey Manipur is the legal entity, as it is the amalgamated unit
from both men and women hockey associations as per conditions
of IOA though the registration number was accorded for these
amalgamated body in January, 2010 having followed all the
existing rules and procedures whereas Manipur Hockey has
violated the norms of registration and it is illegal.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 20
20. This Court considered the rival submissions and
also perused the materials available on record.
21. While Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C) No.724 of 2019
seeking direction on the official respondents to
implement/execute the order dated 22.1.2018 issued by the
Secretary (Cooperation), Government of Manipur and the
subsequent letter dated 14.1.2019 issued by the Registrar of
Societies, Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019 to
quash the very same order dated 22.1.2018.
22. According to Manipur Hockey, it has been formed
on 6.10.2009 pursuant to the resolution of the meeting and the
advice of IOA to the MOA to follow the policy of one game one
association not only for uplifting the game of hockey in the State
of Manipur, but also for the sake and interest of players who are
being deprived of their fruit of labour on account of the
mismanagement by the members administering the sport in the
State of Manipur. Manipur Hockey was registered on 12.11.2009
under Section 7(1) of the Act of 1989.
23. According to Hockey Manipur, Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association were
amalgamated on 21.1.2010 and gave birth to Hockey Manipur,
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 21
which has been registered under Section 12 of the Act of 1989
under the principle of one game one body on 21.1.2010.
24. To analyze the rival submissions of the parties, it
would be appropriate to refer to the earlier litigation filed by the
parties and the consequential proceedings issued by the official
respondents.
25. Before amalgamation of Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association as
Hockey Manipur, the President of Manipur Women's Hockey
Association has filed an appeal before the
Commissioner/Registrar of Societies challenging the registration
of Manipur Hockey dated 12.11.2009. During the pendency of
the said appeal, the Registrar of Societies allowed the
registration of the amalgamated society called Hockey Manipur
by allotting registration No.419/M/SR/2010 and had also issued
an order on 21.1.2010 cancelling the registration number allotted
to the erstwhile Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur
Women's Hockey Association.
26. Assailing the registration certificate granted to
Manipur Hockey, Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C) No.435 of 2010.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 22
By the order dated 17.3.2016, this Court disposed of the said writ
petition with the following lines:
"Heard Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.A.Mohendro, learned counsel for the respondent.
When the matter was taken up for hearing, it has been submitted by Mr.M.Hemchandra, learned counsel for the petitioner that he will be satisfied for the time being if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representation dated 4th January, 2010 submitted by the petitioner for redressal of grievances of the petitioner.
In view of the above submission made, this Court without making any observation as regards the merit of the case of the respective parties, directs the respondent No.1 to dispose of the representation dated 04.01.2010 submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly."
27. It appears that during the pendency of W.P.(C)
No.435 of 2010, the Secretary General of Hockey India
addressed a letter to the Director of Youth and Affairs and Sports,
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 23
Government of Manipur informing that Manipur Hockey is the
only recognized body of Hockey India in Manipur State.
28. Pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P.(C)
No.435 of 2010, the Principal Secretary (Cooperation),
Government of Manipur, after hearing the Manipur Hockey and
Hockey Manipur, passed an order dated 2.8.2016 disposing of
the appeal dated 4.1.2010. The operative portion of the order
reads thus:
"Whereas, an indepth examination was made of the detailed submissions of both the parties highlighting their own substantive points/assertions. On careful consideration particularly taking into all aspects the interest of Hockey game in Manipur, whereby both the Societies have committed and good Hockey players in both the Societies, I arrived at the view that in the best interest of the Hockey Game and players of State, the matter deserves a reconciliation opportunity.
Now, therefore, I Shri K. Moses Chalai, Principal Secretary (Cooperation), Government of Manipur in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under rule No.38 of the MSR Rules, 2004 do hereby give an opportunity to "Manipur Hockey"
and "Hockey Manipur" to reconcile and come
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 24
under a common banner within 6 (sox) months in the best interest of the Hockey Game and Players.
The representation/Co-operative appeal dated 04/01/2010 filed by the petitioner stands disposed of accordingly."
29. Pursuant to the direction of the Principal Secretary,
Manipur Hockey wrote several letters to Hockey Manipur calling
upon them for reconciliation and to unite the two hockey
associations under a common banner. On 12.4.2017, Hockey
Manipur filed another representation to the State Government
praying for cancellation of the registration of Manipur Hockey. By
the order dated 22.5.2017, the Principal Secretary (Cooperation)
passed an order cancelling the registration of Manipur Hockey
with immediate effect and notified Hockey Manipur is genuine
State Level Association for the game of Hockey in the State of
Manipur.
30. Aggrieved by the order dated 22.5.2017, Manipur
Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.391 of 2017 before this Court and
during pendency of the said writ petition, the Principal Secretary
has withdrawn the said order dated 22.5.2017 cancelling the
registration of Manipur Hockey. After issuance of the withdrawal
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 25
order dated 14.6.2017, Hockey Manipur submitted another
representation dated 27.6.2017 to the Principal Secretary
(Cooperation) praying for cancellation of the registration of
Manipur Hockey.
31. Based on the said representation, the Deputy
Secretary (Cooperation) issued summons on 1.7.2017 to
Manipur Hockey and Hockey Manipur for appearance on
10.7.2017. Aggrieved by the issuance of summon dated
1.7.2017, Manipur Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.562 of 2017. By the
interim order dated 31.7.2017, this Court directed the Secretary,
MOA to explore possibility of having a common society relating
to hockey and to submit a report including suggestion, if any.
Pursuant to the interim order, the Secretary, MOA submitted a
report dated 12.8.2017 stating that Manipur Hockey is an
affiliated unit of MOA and also making suggestion to the Court to
advise the national sports federation for bringing an amicable
solution.
32. By the final order dated 19.12.2017, W.P.(C)
No.562 of 2017 came to be allowed and the summon dated
1.7.2017 was quashed. However, the Court observed that it is
open to the State Government to proceed in accordance with law
as regards the registration of a society pertaining to Hockey
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 26
sports in Manipur. The order dated 19.12.2017 is extracted
hereunder:
"Heard Shri M. Devananda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri N. Kumarjeet, learned A.G. appearing for the State respondents and Shri M. Hemchandra, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the private respondent.
By the instant writ petition, the petitioners' Association has prayed for issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the summon dated 1.7.2017 issued by the Deputy Secretary (C-operation), Government of Manipur mainly on the ground that the said summon has been issued on the basis of the representation dated 27.6.2017 addressed to the Principal Secretary (Co- operation Govt. Manipur) by the Secretary, Hockey Manipur praying for cancellation of the registration of the petitioner society.
The registration of Societies in Manipur is regulated by the provisions of Manipur Society Registration Act, 1989. Section 7 provides for registration of society. Section 10 provides that no society shall be registered under a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles, the name of other society or anybody which has been previously registered or incorporated
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 27
under this act or any other law for the time being in force, as the case may be or is deemed to have been registered under this act. Section 11 provides for change of the name of a society in respect of certain circumstances as detailed in the act itself. Rule 14 of the Manipur Society Rule 2014 and in particular, sub-rule 9 reads:-
"In case the society refuses to change the name to alter the memorandum within the specified time in the order of the State Government, the registration of the society shall automatically stand cancelled from the next date of the time specified in the order of the State Government. The cancellation shall be published in the Official Gazette by way of notification in form 'J'. Copies of the notification shall be given to all concerned including the society. The Registrar of societies shall make a report to the State Government in this regard."
On perusal of the provisions of this act, it appears that there is no any provision under the Act for cancellation of the registration of a society except under the proceeding initiated under Section 11 read with Rule 14(9), that is, in regard to the change of name. Rule 14(9) provides that in case any society refused to change the name despite instruction being
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 28
given by the State Government, the registration stands automatically cancelled.
On perusal of the said representation dated 27.6.2017, it appears that it has been submitted purportedly under the provisions of Section 11 of the act which has nothing to do with the cancellation but to change the name of a society. Moreover, the summon dated 1.7.2017 appears to have been issued on the basis of the said representation and therefore, the same is not sustainable in law.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is allowed and consequently, the said summon dated 1.7.2017 is quashed and set aside. However, it is open to the State Government to proceed in accordance with law as regards the registration of a society pertaining to Hockey sports in Manipur, keeping in mind all circumstances and in particular, the fact that the petitioner society is an affiliated unit of MOA as per its report dated 12.8.2017."
33. Admittedly, as against the order dated 19.12.2017,
no appeal has been preferred by the parties, particularly, Manipur
Hockey. In the aforesaid order, it has been clearly stated that
Section 11 of the Act of 1989 has nothing to do with the
cancellation, but only permits to change the name of a society
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 29
and the State Government has been given liberty to proceed in
accordance with law as regards the registration of a society
pertaining to Hockey sports in Manipur.
34. Accordingly, the State Government proceeded with
the matter and upon enquiry and a detailed analysis of the
matter, the Secretary (Cooperation) has passed the impugned
order dated 22.1.2018 holding that when two societies namely
Manipur Women's Hockey Association and Manipur Hockey
Association are already in existence, which are registered
societies, registration of similar society under the name and style
of Manipur Hockey on 12.11.2009 is in clear violation of Section
10 of the Act of 1989 and, accordingly, directed Manipur Hockey
to change its name. The operative portion of order dated
22.1.2018 reads thus:
"6. Now, therefore, after due consideration of the aforesaid facts, I, Shri M. Joy Singh, IAS, Secretary (Cooperation), Government of Manipur, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 11 of MSR Act, 1989 and Rule No.14 sub-rule 9 of MSR Rules, 2004 do hereby direct "Manipur Hockey" to change its name and alter its memorandum within 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of this orders."
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 30
35. Challenging the order dated 22.1.2018, Manipur
Hockey filed W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018. While entertaining the writ
petition, on 27.11.2018, this Court observed that while
considering the matter to find out an amicable solution, it is open
to the Registrar, Societies to invite Hockey Manipur so that the
issue can be resolved for once and all. After considering the
views and suggestions of all the parties, the Registrar was
directed to submit a report to this Court on or before 16.1.2019
and, accordingly, adjourned the writ petition. Pursuant to the
interim order, the Registrar examined the matter and by the letter
dated 14.1.2019 declared that Manipur Hockey has violated the
norms of registration and therefore, it is illegal.
36. By the order dated 30.8.2019, W.P.(C) No.124 of
2018 came to be dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of
necessary party. However, while dismissing the writ petition, this
Court granted liberty to Manipur Hockey to approach any
appropriate forum, including this Court, for redressal of its
grievances in accordance with law. The operative portion of the
order reads thus:
"9. For the reasons stated hereinabove, this Court is of the view that the instant writ petition has no substance for the reason of non-joinder of
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 31
a necessary party and is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. It is, however, open to the petitioners' association to approach any appropriate forum including this Court, for redressal of its grievances in accordance with law."
37. Pursuant to the direction aforesaid, W.P.(C) No.916
of 2019 has been filed by Manipur Hockey to set aside the very
same order dated 22.1.2018 and Hockey Manipur filed W.P.(C)
No.724 of 2019 to implement the order dated 22.1.2018.
38. In the background aforesaid, this Court proceeded
to deal with the issue as to whether the impugned order of the
Secretary (Cooperation) dated 22.1.2018 warrants interference.
39. According to Manipur Hockey, during the course of
meeting held on 29.6.2009, the then Secretary, Manipur Hockey
Association informed that an association of hockey for men and
women had been formed, to which the Secretary, Manipur
Women's Hockey Association did not agree raising an objection
and, therefore, an ad-hoc Committee was constituted.
Thereafter, a Circular dated 1.10.2009 was issued to all the
clubs/organizations for a meeting to be held on 6.10.2009, in
which the members present resolved to form an association
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 32
called Manipur Hockey which was subsequently registered as an
Association under the provisions of the Act of 1989. In the
meantime, another association by name called Hockey Manipur
was registered under the provisions of the Act of 1989 by
amalgamating the earlier two hockey associations. That is the
reason the controversy between these two associations namely
Hockey Manipur and Manipur Hockey arose. The issue is which
one of the said associations shall continue to be recognized and
shall be allowed to represent the State in respect of hockey
game.
40. Though Manipur Hockey was formed and
registered on 12.11.2009, Hockey Manipur got registered
subsequent to it on 21.01.2010. Manipur Hockey themselves
admitted that Hockey Manipur was formed by amalgamation of
two oldest registered societies namely Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association. In their
writ petition [W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019], it has been stated as
under:
"3. That a special joint executive committee meeting of the Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association was held on 28.06.2009 and in the said special joint meeting it was resolved, inter alia, that Manipur
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 33
Hockey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association be amalgamated into one unified body called "Hockey Manipur". In pursuance of the said resolution an order dated 29.06.2009 was issued by the Secretary General of the Hockey Manipur to the effect that the two associations, i.e. Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association is amalgamated and formed an unified body called Hockey Manipur with the 21 executive council members as mentioned in the said order."
41. There is no dispute that Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association were
registered in the year 1976. Though the formation of Manipur
Hockey has been recognized by Manipur Olympic Association as
well as Hockey India, the registration of Manipur Hockey was
done when the registration of Manipur Hockey Association and
Manipur Women's Hockey Association was in force. The
aforesaid is evident from the certificate dated 21.1.2010 issued
by the Registrar of Societies. In the certificate dated 21.1.2010,
it has been stated as under:
"It is hereby certified that pursuant to Section 12 of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 the Societies hitherto called Manipur Women's Hockey Association Regd. No.1994 of 1976
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 34
dated the 23rd October, 1976 and Manipur Hockey Association Regd. No.2002 of 1976 dated the 26th October, 1976 have been amalgamated into one society in the name of Hockey Manipur, Khuman Lampak, Imphal East with reference to the proceedings of the Joint General Body meeting of the two associations held on the 18th October, 2009. Registration No.419/M/SR/2010 dated the 21st January, 2010 has been allotted to the society."
42. Though the registration of Hockey Manipur was
given on 21.1.2010, the process for amalgamation was started
during June, 2009. The very fact was also evident from the status
report submitted by the Registrar of Societies dated 14.1.2019
pursuant to the interim order dated 27.11.2018 passed by this
Court in W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018. For proper appreciation, the
status report dated 14.1.2019 is extracted hereunder:
"In compliance to the order of the Hon'ble High Court of Manipur dated 27/11/2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018 (Manipur Hockey -vs- State of Manipur & Anr.) A meeting has been conducted on 17th December, 2018 and both the parties came for the meeting (9 members from Hockey Manipur and 2 members from Manipur Hockey).
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 35
The two representatives fro Manipur Hockey said that they will not be in a position to take any responsibilities decisions and that the Meeting be postponed. However, as the representatives from Hockey Manipur had come in full strength and also prior information about the Meeting had been served to both (meeting notice vide letter no. Q- Coop/Case/W.P.(C) No.124 of 2018 dated 10th December, 2018); Manipur Hockey coming only at the time of the Meeting seeking postponement is not acceptable to this office as it is a deliberate attempt to foil the meeting.
Hence, it may be stated that re-conciliation looks non-feasible at this juncture and hence the following facts are stated as below for arriving at final solution.
The Manipur Hockey While the process being done for Association & The Manipur registration of one body Manipur Women's Hockey Association Hockey was given registration by formed in the year 1976 the RCS on 12th November, 2009.
As per instructions from Indian Became an entirely new body with Olympic Association (IOA) The no representatives from the Manipur Hockey Association previously existing bodies got amalgamated. Hence, with (Associations) this the separate registration No. of Men and Women done away with
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 36
Instructions from IOA was given There is no amalgamation as such to form "One Game on body" on June 1, 2009 and as per the instructions both The Manipur Hockey Association & The Manipur Women's Hockey Association came to a conclusion for the formation of Hockey Manipur.
Amalgamated already in 2009 Only 5 days were given after the on 28th June while the advertisement for registration of registration number was given Manipur Hockey before the on 21st January, 2010 after registration was done in violation following all the process of of Rules 13 of the MSR Act, 2004. registration
Further their notification was objected by the Secretary Hockey Manipur on two occasions on 13th October, 2009 and on 6th November, 2009 well ahead of the Registration being issued on 12th November, 2009.
Accordingly, the Principal Secretary also de-registered Manipur Hockey. However, the same was withdrawn by the order of the Hon'ble High Court dated 31/07/2017.
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 37
The Secretary, Cooperation had also directed Manipur Hockey change as name on 22nd January 2018 within 3 months. But this order is stayed by the Hon'ble High Court of Manipur's order dated 16.2.2018.
Further there is no record of No Objection certificate (NOC) from Youth Affairs & Sports (YAS) being the parent Department, NOC is usually sought form only one letter from the then Director (YA) address to the Addl.
Registrar Societies seeking classification as to the objection being invited or not. The letter is dated 10th Dec, 2009 way after registration was done.
At this juncture as directed by the Hon'ble Court to consider both the facts and present is before the Court the following is stated:
"Hockey Manipur is the Legal entity as it is the amalgamated unit from both Men and Women as per conditions of IOA though registration number was accorded for these amalgamated body in Jan 2010 having followed all the existing rules and procedures."
However, Manipur Hockey has violated the norms of registration (Section 5, Section 10 and Rule 13
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 38
of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989) and hence, it is illegal."
43. As could be seen from the materials produced by
the parties, in terms of letter dated 01.6.2009 of the Indian
Olympic Association, the Manipur Olympic Association vide its
letter dated 27.6.2009 invited the President, Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women Hockey Association for a joint
meeting for the formation of a single association. Both the
associations agreed for merger and after completion of all
formalities, they stood amalgamated into a single society. While
following the lengthy process and taking advantage of the
situation with the connivance of the President, Manipur Olympic
Association, an ad-hoc committee was constituted, which got
Manipur Hockey registered as a society, which was recognized
even before its registration. As stated supra, pending
amalgamation of the aforesaid two associations, Manipur
Hockey got registered, which is not the idea of the Indian Olympic
Association. In fact, the Manipur Olympic Association informed
the two associations for formation of a single association and the
ad-hoc committee has no right to form Manipur Hockey and got
registered. Since Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur
Women's Hockey Association are very old registered
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 39
associations and decided to amalgamated as Hockey Manipur
and the process started for it during June, 2009 itself, the
formation of Manipur Hockey is nothing but an association
formed by violating the procedure laid down under the Act of
1989 and the Rules of 2004 and obtained registration certificate.
44. In fact, Manipur Hockey registered under Section
7(1) of the Act, whereas Hockey Manipur is an amalgamated
society registered under Section 12 of the Act. For ready
reference, Sections 7 and 12 of the Act are quoted hereunder:
"7. Registration :-
(1) The Registrar upon being satisfied that the memorandum and the regulations accompanying it comply with the requirements of this Act and the rules and upon payment of the fee referred to in sub-section (2) shall certify under this hand and seal that the society is registered under this Act.
(2) There shall be paid to the Registrar, for the registration of a society under this Act, a fee of one hundred rupees, or such smaller fee as the State Government may from time to time direct.
(3) An appeal shall lie to the State Government against an order of the Registrar refusing to certify the registration of an association as a
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 40
society under this Act and the decision on such appeal shall be final.
12. Societies to have power to amalgamate with another society :-
(1) Whenever two or more societies desire to amalgamate, the governing body of each such society shall submit a joint proposal in writing to the Registrar for his prior approval thereto.
(2) No such proposal shall have effect unless the proposal, with the modification, if any, suggested by the Registrar is confirmed by three-fifths of the joint members of the societies concerned.
(3) An appeal shall lie to the State Government against any order of the State Government on such appeal shall be final.
(4) On the proposal being confirmed -
(a) the amalgamated society shall be registered under its new name;
(b)the registration of the amalgamating societies shall be cancelled; and
(c) the assets and the liabilities of the amalgamating societies shall be the assets and the liabilities of the amalgamated society."
Thus, it is clear that whenever two or more societies
desire to amalgamate, the governing body of each such society
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 41
shall submit a joint proposal in writing to the Registrar for his prior
approval. In the case on hand, Hockey Manipur has fulfilled the
provisions of Section 12 of the Act of 1989 and accordingly got
registered.
45. Though after formation of Manipur Hockey and
Hockey Manipur both the Societies have produced good hockey
players, sanctity has to be given to the old associations which got
amalgamated on 21.1.2010 as Hockey Manipur. In fact, in the
impugned order dated 22.1.2018, the Secretary (Cooperation),
after analyzing the matter in a proper perspective with applicable
provisions of law, has passed the order. For better appreciation,
the impugned order dated 22.1.2018 is quoted herein below:
"No.8/7/2009-Coop: Whereas, Certificate of Registration of a Society Under the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 (Manipur Act 1 of 1990) bearing No.402/M/SR/2009 dated 12th November, 2009 issued by Registrar of Societies, Manipur in respect of "Manipur Hockey" reads as under:
"It is hereby certified that MANIPUR HOCKEY having its registered address at Imphal has been registered under Section 7(1) of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 (Manipur Act 1 of 1990) bearing Registration No.402/M/SR/2009."
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 42
2. Whereas, the Certificate of Registration of an Amalgamated Society under the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 (Manipur Act 1 of 1990) bearing No.419/M/SR/2010 issued by Registrar of Societies, Manipur on 21.1.2010 in respect of "Hockey Manipur" reads as under:
"It is hereby certified that pursuant to Section 12 of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 the Societies hitherto called Manipur Women's Hockey Association Regd. No.1994 of 1976 dated the 23rd October, 1976 and Manipur Hockey Association Regd. No.2002 of 1976 dated the 26thOctober, 1976 have been amalgamated into one society in the name of Hockey Manipur, Khuman Lampak, Imphal East with reference to the proceedings of the Joint General Body meeting of the two associations held on the 18th October, 2009. Registration No.419/M/SR/2010 dated the 21st January, 2010 has been allotted to the society."
3. Whereas, Section 10 of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 lays down as under:
"10. Name of the society:- No society shall be registered under a name which is identical with or too nearly resembles, the name of any other society or anybody corporate which has been previously registered or incorporated under this Act or and other law for the time being in force, as
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 43
the case may be, or is deemed to have been registered under this Act."
4. And whereas, Section 11 of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989 lays down as under:
"11. State Government may direct change of name:- (1) If a society is registered under a name, or alters its name to another, name which in the opinion of the State Government is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of any other society or body corporate which have been previously registered or incorporated under this Act or any other law for the first time being in force or being deemed to have been registered under this Act, continues to exist, the State Government may by order made in this behalf direct such society to change its name and alter its memorandum within three months from the date of the order on such longer period as the State Government may think fit to allow."
5. And whereas, on perusal and examining the above two certificates minutely, it is fully convinced that when the following two Societies called under the name and style Manipur Women's Hockey Association Regd. No.1994 of 1976 dated the 23rd October, 1976 and Manipur Hockey Association Regd. No.2002 of 1976 dated the 26th October, 1976 are already existing Registered Societies,
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 44
registration of a similar Society under the name and style of 'Manipur Hockey' on 12.11.2009 is a clear violation of Section 10 of the Manipur Societies Registration Act, 1989.
6. Now, therefore, after due consideration of the aforesaid facts, I, Shri M. Joy Singh, IAS, Secretary (Cooperation), Government of Manipur, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 11 of MSR Act, 1989 and Rule No.14 sub-rule 9 of MSR Rules, 2004 do hereby direct "Manipur Hockey" to change its name and alter its memorandum within 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of this orders."
46. The challenge to the impugned order dated
22.1.2018 has been made by Manipur Hockey mainly on the
ground that the first respondent with an ulterior, preconceived
and premeditated motive to cancel the registration of Manipur
Hockey has passed the said order. At this juncture, it is pertinent
to point out that if a person challenged the order on the ground
that with an ulterior and preconceived motive the authority has
passed the order, it is his bounden duty of the party who alleged
such allegation has to prove the same. But in the instant case,
Manipur Hockey has failed to show any material in support of
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 45
their plea that the impugned order has been passed with an
ulterior motive.
47. As stated supra, when Manipur Women's Hockey
Association and Manipur Hockey Association were the existing
registered societies, the registration of similar society under the
name and style Manipur Hockey was done, that too after the
amalgamation process was initiated. As per Section 10 of the
Act, no society shall be registered under a name which is
identical with or too nearly resembles the other. In this regard,
Rule 13 of the Rules 2004 provides:
"13. Similar or nearly similar names and identification under section 10: When an application for registration is received, it shall be examined in the office of the Registrar of Societies whether societies of similar or nearly similar names have already been registered in the office. Other books of records, which may give a clue to this, shall also be checked up. The same process shall be done when a proposal or decision for change of name of society is in receipt.
Before registration and change of names publications shall be made by the society in the widely circulated local newspapers inviting objection to the registration under the name of
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 46
change of the name. The objections shall be submitted within 15 days from the date of public to the Registrar of societies."
48. The learned senior counsel for Hockey Manipur
submitted that as per the report of the Registrar of Societies only
5 days were given after the advertisement for registration of
Manipur Hockey before the registration was done. Therefore, as
rightly argued by learned counsel for Hockey Manipur, the
registration of Manipur Hockey was done in violation of Rule 13
of the Rules of 2004.
49. The learned senior counsel, by placing reliance
upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Dhanajaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka, (2001) 4 SCC 9
submitted that where law requires a thing to be done in a certain
manner, it has to be done in that manner only and not otherwise.
50. In Dhanajaya Reddy (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme
Court held thus:
"23. It is settled principle of law that where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain manner, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. This Court in State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh, AIR 1964 SC 358 held:
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 47
"A Magistrate, therefore, cannot in the course of investigation record a confession except in the manner laid down in Section 164. The power to record the confession had obviously been given so that the confession might be proved by the record of it made in the manner laid down."
In the instant case, admittedly, before issuance of
registration in favour of Manipur Hockey, a clear 15 days period
was not given for submission of objections, if any as stipulated in
Rule 13 of the Rules of 2004.
51. It is also the submission of learned senior counsel
for Hockey Manipur that one should not be enriched by loss or
injury to another and person seeking equity must do equity and
no litigant can play hide and seek with the Courts or adopt pick
and choose method. In support, he has placed reliance upon the
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kishore
Samrite v. State of UP and others, (2013) 2 SCC 398.
52. In Kishore Samrite (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme
Court held:
"37. The person seeking equity must do equity. It is not just the clean hands, but also clean mind, clean heart and clean objective that are the equi-
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 48
fundamentals of judicious litigation. The legal maxim jure naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem, which means that it is a law of nature that one should not be enriched by the loss or injury to another, is the percept for courts. Wide jurisdiction of the court should not become a source of abuse of process of law by the disgruntled litigant. Careful exercise is also necessary to ensure that the litigation is genuine, not motivated by extraneous considerations and imposes an obligation upon the litigant to disclose the true facts and approach the court with clean hands.
38. No litigant can play "hide and seek" with the courts or adopt "pick and choose". True facts ought to be disclosed as the court knows law, but not facts. One, who does not come with candid facts and clean breast cannot hold a writ of the court with soiled hands. Suppression or concealment of material facts is impermissible to a litigant or even as a technique of advocacy. In such cases, the court is duty-bound to discharge rule nisi and such applicant is required to be dealt with for contempt of court for abusing the process of court. (K.D. Sharma v. SAIL [(2008) 12 SCC 481])."
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 49
53. It is apposite to mention that when Manipur Hockey
got registered, the aforesaid two old registered societies were
functional and admittedly their registrations were not cancelled.
While the aforesaid is the fact, the authority concerned ought not
to have registered Manipur Hockey and issued certificate in
favour of them on 12.11.2009. In fact, Manipur Hockey by
concealing the real facts had obtained the registration in favour
of them.
54. At this juncture, learned counsel for Manipur
Hockey submitted that Manipur Hockey is the only body affiliated
and recognized by the Hockey India and MOA for the sports of
hockey in the State of Manipur. According to learned senior
counsel for Manipur Hockey, Manipur Hockey is the body which
has conducted tournaments at different levels in the State of
Manipur and on the other hand, Hockey Manipur has not
undertaken not a single activity worth its name and in other
words, it exists only in paper.
55. Countering the said submission, the learned senior
counsel for Hockey Manipur submitted that many members of
Hockey Manipur have been participating in various national and
international level hockey matches. Nothing has been produced
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 50
by Manipur Hockey to show that Hockey Manipur is existing in
paper only and no activities are undertaken by them.
56. It is true that Manipur Hockey has conducted many
tournaments at different levels in the State and equally, Hockey
Manipur has also participated in various national and
international level hockey matches. That is not the issue to be
decided in the present petitions. Therefore, this Court has not
delved into the issue qua conducting of tournaments and
participation of Hockey Manipur and Manipur Hockey at different
levels in the State. Once an identical name exists, whether a
society/association can be registered under the identical or too
nearly resembles is the point to be considered in this case. In
this regard, as stated supra, Section 10 of the Act clearly
prohibits registration of such society which is identical with or too
nearly resembles. It is the admitted case of Manipur Hockey that
at the time of its registration, Manipur Hockey Association and
Manipur Workmen's Hockey Association were in existence.
57. It is clear from the material produced, at the time of
formation of Manipur Hockey under Section 7(1) of the Manipur
Societies Registration Act, 1989, the two societies, namely
Manipur Hockey Association and Manipur Workmen's Hockey
Association were in existence and, thus, there is gross violation
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 51
of Section 10 of the Act of 1989 in the registration of Manipur
Hockey. Finding that Section 11 of the Act provides change of
name, the Secretary (Cooperation) has rightly directed the
Manipur Hockey to change its name. At this juncture, it is
pertinent to mention that Hockey Manipur has been formed by
way of amalgamation of the erstwhile Manipur Hockey
Association and Manipur Women's Hockey Association under
Section 12 of the Act and their amalgamation process started
way back in January 2010 i.e. before registration of Manipur
Hockey.
58. Due to the existence of Hockey Manipur and
Manipur Hockey in the State of Manipur, really it not only causing
confusion, and in effect the game of hockey in the State is at
stake. Since the Hockey Manipur is an amalgamated of the
previous two societies which were registered in the year 1976, it
would be appropriate to continue Hockey Manipur in its name for
betterment of hockey game in the State of Manipur. Since the
registration of Manipur Hockey is in violation of Section 10 of the
Act of 1989, the Secretary (Cooperation) has rightly directed
Manipur Hockey to change its name and alter its memorandum
within three months. The aforesaid view and conclusion arrived
at by the Secretary (Cooperation) is in the interest of both Hockey
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 52
Manipur and Manipur Hockey. This Court is of the view that such
a conclusion arrived at by the Secretary (Coordination) is based
on in depth examination and consideration of the substantive
points put forth by both the parties and also taking into
consideration that both Hockey Manipur and Manipur Hockey
have committed and produced many of the players.
59. In view of the categorical finding arrived at by the
Secretary (Cooperation) and the issuance of the impugned order,
this Court finds that there is no infirmity in the impugned order
dated 22.1.2018. That apart, the ground taken to challenge the
impugned order by Manipur Hockey is not sustainable in the eye
of law. Therefore, the impugned order dated 22.01.2018 needs
to be implemented. As directed by the Secretary in the impugned
order dated 22.1.2018, if implementation is done, really no
prejudice would be caused to Manipur Hockey. On the other
hand, if it is not changed, the concept of amalgamation of two
oldest societies as Hockey Manipur is meaningless.
60. For the foregoing discussions, this Court is of the
view that the impugned order dated 22.1.2018 has been issued
by the Secretary (Cooperation) pursuant to series of orders
passed by this Court and the letter correspondence of the
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019 P a g e | 53
respondent authorities. Therefore, there is no ground to interfere
with the impugned order dated 22.1.2018.
61. In the result,
(i) W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019 is dismissed.
(ii) W.P.(C) No.724 of 2019 is allowed. The
respondents 1 and 2 are directed to
implement/execute the order dated
22.1.2018 passed by the Secretary
(Cooperation), Government of Manipur and
the letter dated 14.1.2019 issued by the
Registrar of Societies, Manipur within a
period of two months from the date of receipt
of a copy of this order.
(iii) Since W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019 is dismissed,
the interim order dated 13.11.2019 passed in
W.P.(C) No.916 of 2019 and its subsequent
extension shall stand vacated.
(iv) No costs.
JUDGE
FR/NFR
Sushil
W.P.(C) No. 724 of 2019 with WP(C) No. 916 of 2019
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!