Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 220 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2026
SA No. 923 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19-01-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
SA No. 923 of 2015 &
M.P.No.1 of 2015
Dhananjayan
S/o. Subramani,
Periyakadambur Village,
Kasavarajapettai Post, Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore
Dist.
..Appellant(s)
Vs
1. Gnanasekaran
S/o. Jayaraman
2. J. Lakshmi
W/o. Balaji.
Both At Periyakadambur Village,
Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk,
Tiruvallore Dist.
3. S. Shanmugham
S/o. Gopal,
4. Jayaraman
S/o. Gopal.
5. Karthikeyan
S/o. Gopal.
6. Valliammal
W/o. Gopal.
3 To 6 Residing At Periyakadambur Village,
Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk,
Tiruvallore Dist.
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 11:56:41 am )
SA No. 923 of 2015
7. Rani
W/o. Govindaswamy,
Nemili Village & Post
Via Arungulam, Tiruttani Tk,
Tiruvallore Dist.
8. Janaki
W/o. Balan,
Periyar Nagar, Maddur Village & Post,
Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallur Dist.
9. Boopalan
S/o. Shanmugam
10. Thulasiraman
S/o. Jayaraman
11. Chandrasekaran
S/o. Jayaraman.
9 To 11 Residing At Periyakadambur Village,
Kasavarajapettai Post Firka, Tiruttani Tk,
Tiruvallore Dist.
12. Gajenda Chetty
Kasavarajapettai Village & Po,
Tiruttani Tk, Tiruvallore Dist.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. to set aside the
Judgement and Decree passed in Appeal Suit in No.4 of 2013 dated
18.09.2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruttani confirming the
Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.no.40 of 2007 dated 23.12.2011 on the
file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruttani in so far as granting a preliminary
decree and allotting of 1/6th share to defendants 5 and 6 each by allowing the
Second Appeal.
__________
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 11:56:41 am )
SA No. 923 of 2015
For Appellant(s): No appearance
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar for R7 and R8
No appearance for R1, R2, R5, R6 and R7 to R12
R3 and R4 died.
JUDGMENT
On earlier occasion, viz., on 09.12.2025, the learned counsel for the
appellant filed a memo dated 09.12.2025 stating ‘no instructions’, therefore,
this Court, directed the Registry to remove the name of the counsel for the
appellant in the cause list and ordered to list the matter on 19.12.2025. On
19.12.2025, though the name of the appellant is printed in the cause list, the
appellant failed to appear before this Court, therefore, this Court directed the
Registry to post the matter 08.01.2026.
2. Again, on 08.01.2026 also, there is no representation for the
appellant, hence the appeal was directed to be listed on 19.01.2026 under the
caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, when the appeal is taken up for hearing, there
is no representation for the appellant, hence the present appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed. No costs.
19-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssd
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 11:56:41 am )
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Tiruttani
2. The District Munsif Court, Tiruttani
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 11:56:41 am )
P.DHANABAL, J.
ssd
19-01-2026
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/01/2026 11:56:41 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!