Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Chandrasekar
2026 Latest Caselaw 141 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 141 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Chandrasekar on 9 January, 2026

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                         Reserved on                             10.12.2025
                                        Pronounced on                             09.01.2026

                                                           CORAM

                  THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

                                               C.M.A. No.1839 of 2022
                                             and C.M.P. No.13286 of 2022

                M/s.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                Vellala Street, Raghavan Complex,
                1st Floor, Ariyalur-621 704
                                                                                                  ..Appellant
                                                                .vs.

                1.Chandrasekar

                2.Nallammal                                                                    ..Respondents

                Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles
                Act, 1988, against the decree and judgment dated 09.08.2021 made in
                M.C.O.P.No.31 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ariyalur.


                                        For Appellant          : Mr. S.Arun Kumar

                                        For Respondents : Ms.A.Subadra
                                                          for Mr.C.Jayaprakash for R1
                                                          No appearance for R2




                                                        JUDGMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm ) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the decree and

judgment dated 09.08.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.31 of 2017 on the file of the

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ariyalur.

2.Briefly stated, accident took place on 12.11.2016, when tractor bearing

Registration no. TN 46 D 8860 dashed against the two wheeler of the claimant.

The Tractor was owned by 2 nd respondent/ Nallammal and insured with the

appellant/Insurance Company. As a result of this accident, the claimants suffered

grievous injuries on his right leg and injuries all over the body. His allegation is

that the alleged accident happened due to rash and negligent driving of the

tractor. The opposition to the claim is that the claimant himself fell down from

the two wheeler and sustained injuries. The claims Tribunal holds that the

tractor was being driven rashly and negligently and caused the accident, is

proved and awarded a sum of Rs.13,17,010/- as compensation to the claimant.

3.Through this appeal, award has been challenged on the grounds namely

negligent, apportionment on contributory negligence and quantum.

4. Mr.S.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance

Company would submit that the Tribunal erred in holding the driver of the

Tractor responsible to the extent of 70% inspite of the fact that the alleged

accident has occurred due to the 1 st respondent's own negligence which is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm ) substantiated by Ex.R1 AR copy, in which it is mentioned that the claimant

himself fell down from the two wheeler and sustained injuries. Hence, the

appellant/Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation.

5.On the other hand, Ms.A.Subadra for Mr.C.Jayaprakash learned counsel

for the 1st respondent/Claimant submits that the alleged accident took place due

to the rash and negligent act of the driver of the tractor. The claims Tribunal

after appreciating the materials on record rightly fixed 70 % contributory

negligence, which warrants any interference by this Court.

6.I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the

respective parties.

7. As regards negligence, the Tribunal had taken note of the oral evidence

as well as Ex.P.1 FIR and Ex.P.6 copy of the judgement in S.T.C.No.277/2018

dated 22.04.2018, where the driver of the tractor admitting his negligence, paid

the fine, and applying the principles of 'preponderance of probabilities'' laid

down in United India Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Krishnaveni and others

reported in 2016 (1) TNMAC 563 DB has held that the driver of the offending

vehicle was responsible to the accident to the extent of 70% contributory

negligence. Apart from that, the Tribunal has considered the evidence of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm ) eyewitnesses P.W.2 and P.W.3 and came to the conclusion that the driver of the

tractor was at fault. Though, the appellant/Insurance Company has relied on

Ex.R.1 copy of accident register, the claimant has clearly deposed that due to the

said accident he was unconscious and therefore he was not aware about what

was registered by the Doctor in the accident register. This evidence of the

claimant was not discredited by the appellant /Insurance Company. In fact, the

appellant / Insurance Company neither examined the driver of the tractor or the

Investigating Officer to prove the manner of accident. No independent witness

was also examined to prove the manner of accident. However, the Tribunal has

recorded a finding of fact that accident occurred due to rash and negligent

driving of the offending vehicle and also recorded a finding that the injured also

contributed to the negligence and apportioned 30% contributory negligence to

the claimant. This finding of the Tribunal is based on proper analysis of

evidence brought on record and there appears to be no illegality in the same.

Therefore, this Court do not find any reason to interfere with the findings of the

Tribunal relating to negligence.

8.With reference to quantum of compensation, the Tribunal has awarded a

sum of Rs.17,56,440/- towards loss of income. Considering the nature of injury

sustained by the claimant and his avocation. The Tribunal has also allowed a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm ) sum of Rs.50,000/- for loss of amenities considering the disability suffered by

the claimant. Thus, in this manner the total amount of compensation determined

by the Tribunal is Rs.18,81,440/- and after deducting 30% for the contributory

negligence, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.13,17,010/- as compensation

for the injury sustained by the claimant. On a careful consideration of the entire

facts and circumstances no illegality or infirmity is found in the award passed by

the learned Tribunal.

9.There is no force in the civil miscellaneous appeal and the same is

dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.



                                                                                       09.01.2026
                Index         : Yes
                Speaking Order
                Neutral citation : Yes
                vsn

                To

                1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate,
                  Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                  Ariyalur.
                2.The Section Officer,
                  V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm )
                                                    K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

                                                                                          vsn










                                                                                    09.01.2026








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/01/2026 06:36:26 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter