Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7359 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2025
CMA(MD). No.1005 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
CMA. (MD). No.1005 of 2025
Maheswaran ... Petitioner
Vs
Gokila,
W/o.Maheswaran,
No.52/1, East
Ramanathapuram,
Dindigul District.. ... Respondent
PRAYER :-Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under section 19 of Family
Court Act, r/w 47 Guardian and wards Act to set aside the Fair and
Decreetal order passed in G.W.O.P.No.68 of 2023 dated 30.04.2024 on
the file of the Family Court, Dindigul.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Illanchezian
For Respondent : Mr.V.Muthumani
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/09/2025 11:31:13 am )
CMA(MD). No.1005 of 2025
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN,J.)
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the fair and
decreetal order passed in G.W.O.P.No.68 of 2023 dated 30.04.2024 on
the file of the Family Court, Dindigul.
2. The appellant is the husband and the respondent is the wife and
they were blessed with a male child and the child is aged 6 years. Due to
matrimonial discard, the respondent got divorce and the child is with the
natural guardian mother. The appellant had approached the trial Court
claiming interim custody of the child by filing GWOP No.68/2023.
3. Though the appellant has filed GWOP No.68/2023 on the file of
the family Court, Dindigul, claiming custody of the minor child, the said
petition was dismissed by the Court below. However, the Court below
granted only visitation rights of 2 hrs. between 10 am and 12 pm., every
fortnight, ie., alternative Saturdays at Kottaimariamman Temple,
Dindigul. Aggrieved by the said visitation rights, the appellant/husband
is before this Court with this appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/09/2025 11:31:13 am )
4. It is seen from the records that the respondent/wife got divorce
and the relationship of the appellant and the respondent is not in dispute.
The child is hardly 6 years old and the family Court, while dealing with
the petition for guardianship, has given reasons for not granting the relief
of interim custody.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
considering the age of the child, this Court is not inclined to interfere
with the order passed by the family Court regarding the relief of interim
custody. However, considering the age of the child, this Court is inclined
to modify the duration of visitation, ie., between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m.
Accordingly, the appellant shall visit his child between 10 a.m., and 2
p.m., every fortnight ie., alternative Saturdays at Kottaimariamman
Temple, Dindigul.
6. With the above modification, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
stands disposed of. No costs.
[P.V.,J] [L.V.G.,J]
22.09.2025
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
RR
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/09/2025 11:31:13 am )
To
1.The Family Court, Dindigul.
2.The VR Section
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/09/2025 11:31:13 am )
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
AND
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
RR
ORDER
IN
Date : 22.09.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/09/2025 11:31:13 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!