Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.J. Karppagadevi vs The Secretary
2025 Latest Caselaw 7195 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7195 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025

Madras High Court

S.J. Karppagadevi vs The Secretary on 18 September, 2025

                                                                                      W.P.(MD) No.21807 of 2017

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                           Reserved On           : 31.07.2025

                                           Pronounced On : 18.09.2025

                                                        CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE

                                          W.P. (MD) No.21807 of 2017
                                                     and
                                          W.M.P.(MD)No.18098 of 2017
                     S.J. Karppagadevi
                     (Retired Teacher)
                     W/o Late Mr.A. Xavier Manuel Raj
                     No.4-A, Mendonsa Colony
                     Nagal Nagar
                     Dindigul - 624 003
                     Dindigul District.                                   ... Petitioner
                                            Vs.

                     1. The Secretary
                     Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Department of School Eduction
                     Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

                     2. The Director of School Education
                     D.P.I. Complex
                     College Road
                     Chennai - 600 006.

                     3. The District Educational Officer
                     Dindigul District,
                     Dindigul - 624 001.

                     4. The Correspondent
                     Dudley Higher Secondary School
                     Dindigul - 624 001.


                     1/10


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )
                                                                                              W.P.(MD) No.21807 of 2017



                     5. The Headmaster
                     Dudley Higher Secondary School
                     Dindigul - 624 001.                                                      ... Respondents


                     PRAYER in W.P.:
                                  To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     pertaining to the Impugned Order in O.Mu.No.l681/A3/2017 dated
                     31.07.2017 on the file of the Respondent No.3 and quash the same as
                     illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No.l to pay Interest @
                     12.% p.a. for 8 years of delayed settlement petitioner’s retirement claim
                     in respect of Earned and Unearned Leave totaling to the tune of
                     Rs.2,30,909/- within the time period stipulated by this Hon’ble Court and
                     pass any further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and
                     proper under the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice.


                     PRAYER in WMP:
                                  To dispense with the production of the original copy of the
                     Impugned Order in O.Mu.No.l681/A3/2017 dated 31.07.2017 on the file
                     of the Respondent No.3 for the present and thus render justice.


                     APPEARANCE OF PARTIES:
                                  For Petitioner          : Mr.G.Karthik, Advocate
                                                            for M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy Associates

                                  For Respondents         : Mr.T.Amjad Khan,
                                                            Government Advocate for R1 to R3.

                                                           R4, R5 – notice served.
                                                           No appearance.

                     2/10


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )
                                                                                             W.P.(MD) No.21807 of 2017




                                                         JUDGMENT

Heard.

2. The Petitioner, a retired school teacher, had served in the 5th

Respondent institution—an aided private minority-run school. This writ

petition is the second filed by the Petitioner. In the earlier writ petition,

W.P.(MD) No. 4512 of 2009, the Petitioner sought a direction to the

Respondents to produce her complete service records and particulars of

surrender leave, and to sanction the corresponding surrender leave salary

and arrears of incentive, together with interest at a nominal rate as may

be determined by this Court. That writ petition, however, was referred to

the Pension Lok Adalat. By its Award dated 19.07.2014, the Lok Adalat

passed the following order: –

“The petitioner along with her Counsel is present and the first respondent along with the Superintendent from the Office of the District Educational Officer are present and the Headmaster of the third respondent School is also present.

All the parties have agreed that the matter has already been settled out of Court and all the benefits had been paid to the petitioner. Further, the revised pension proposal has also been forwarded to the Accountant General, Chennai and the first respondent Department agrees to follow up the matter to get the revised pension at the earliest to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

Recording the same, the matter is disposed of, as settled out of Court.

The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner provided under the Court Fees Act 1870 as provided for under Sub Section 1 of Section 21 of the LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

The original of the award shall be placed in the Court record and Copy of the award shall be kept with High Court Legal Service Committee and one copy each is furnished to both parties free of cost.

In agreement of the above, both parties and their counsel have affixed their signatures / Thumb impressions in presence of the Lok Adalat Bench admitting the terms and conditions and accordingly, the award is passed.

                                Petitioner              Counsel for the Petitioner
                               Respondents              Counsel for the Respondents”



3. The Petitioner again approached the Lok Adalat by filing an

application, contending that the interest amount had not been paid. By

order dated 05.07.2016, the Member of the Lok Adalat issued the

following advice: –

“Both the parties are present. The respondent has filed a report stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled by the High Court Legal Services Committee on 19.07.2014 and the parties have also signed the same. However, the petitioner reported that the interest amount has not been paid. The petitioner is directed to get in touch with the counsel and take appropriate steps.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

4. Pursuant to the said advice, the Petitioner submitted a

representation dated 30.01.2017 to the Respondents. However, the 3rd

Respondent, the District Educational Officer, Dindigul, by the impugned

order dated 31.07.2017, rejected the request and informed the Petitioner

as follows: –

“nkw;go jPu;gg; pd; mog;gilapy; vjpu; kDjhuu;fis fy;tpjJ; iw midj;J bjhiffisa[k; kDjhuUf;F tH';fg;gl;Ls;sJ vd;Wk; nkYk; kDjhuupd; gpur;rpid 19/07/2014 cj;jputpdg; o jPu;f;fg;gl;Ltpll; J vd;Wk; jPu;f;fg;gl;l gpur;rpid FwpjJ; kPz;Lk; rK:fj;jplk; kDjhuu; evidence act go Estoppal by contact Mfpwhu; vd;Wk; rk;ge;jg;gl;l gs;spj; jhshsu; fojj;jpy; Fwpgg; pl;Ls;shu;/ nkYk; kDit j';fsplk; mspj;Js;sj tUj;jj;jpw;FupaJ vd;Wk; Fwpgg; pl;Ls;s mjd; efypida[k; ,j;Jld; ,izj;J mDg;gpa[s;nsd; vd;gija[k; gzptl[ d; bjuptpj;Jf;bfhs;fpnwd;/”

5. The Petitioner has once again approached this Court challenging

the said order. When the matter was listed on 28.11.2017, notice was

taken by the official Respondents. Pursuant thereto, the 3rd Respondent

filed a counter affidavit dated 15.10.2024. In paragraphs 5 and 6 of the

said counter affidavit, it has been stated as follows: –

“5. a) The W.P.(MD) No. 4512 of 2009 filed by the petitioner regarding the retirement benefits, was pending it was merged with the Lok Adalat and on 19-07-2014 the matter was settled with the consent of all the parties and in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

the settlement, the petitioner, respondents and the counsels also signed in the settlement. Now the petitioner cannot reopen the matter.

b) and c) The matter regarding payment of leave benefits was sanctioned early and the delay was caused due to the non submission of Income tax statements by the petitioner. However the matter was settlement on 19-07-2014 by Lok Adalat and the petitioner has also signed in the settlement. Now at this distance point of time she cannot raise the claim.

d) The Petitioner has cited a case which is irrelevant to the subject matter of the case. The claim is for the payment interest on belated payment of leave benefits whereas the case referred to by the petitioner is for the payment of interest on belated payment of Gratuity. However once the matter is settled by the Lok Adalat on 19-07-2014 which was also acceptable to her now she cannot turn round and claim again on the settled matter.

6. It is submitted that on 26-05-2011 when the claim was submitted to the treasury, the bill was audited for the reasons that the petitioner did not file the income tax return. It was informed to the petitioner. Accordingly the petitioner was equally responsible for the delayed payment. It is also submitted that the Correspondent of the School has stated in his letter dated 02-06-2017, the matter was settled on 19-07-2014 and the petitioner has also signed in the settlement and now the petitioner has reopened the matter which is regrettable. This matter was also conveyed to the petitioner on 31-07-2017.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

6. In view of the foregoing, it remains unclear how the Petitioner

can lay claim to interest at the rate of 18% for the alleged delay in

payment, particularly when no Lok Adalat award was passed in terms of

an agreement between the parties. What was recorded was merely an

order dismissing the matter on the ground that it had been settled outside

the Court. It is also pertinent to note that, in the first round of litigation,

the Petitioner had sought only nominal interest in her affidavit, and the

Lok Adalat’s award contains no direction whatsoever granting any

interest.

7. There exists a substantial distinction between an award passed

on the basis of a settlement and an order merely recording that the matter

was settled outside the Court. In this context, the reliance placed by the

Petitioner’s counsel on the judgment in W.P.(MD) No. 14899 of 2022

dated 13.09.2022 is wholly misplaced, as it bears no relevance to the

present case. Likewise, the decision in D.S. Nakara & Ors. v. Union of

India, reported in (1983) 1 SCC 305, has been cited only for the general

principle that pension is neither a bounty nor a largesse extended by the

State.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

8. In light of the foregoing discussion, the Petitioner has not made

out any case warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Writ

Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected W.M.P. is closed.

No order as to costs.

18.09.2025

Index: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes / No LS/ay To

1. The Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Department of School Eduction Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Director of School Education D.P.I. Complex College Road Chennai - 600 006.

3. The District Educational Officer Dindigul District Dindigul - 624 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

4. The Correspondent Dudley Higher Secondary School Dindigul - 624 001.

5. The Headmaster Dudley Higher Secondary School Dindigul - 624 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J.

LS

Pre-delivery Judgment made in

18.09.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 03:36:54 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter