Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7187 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025
Crl.O.P.No.25487 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.25487 of 2025
Sathiya @ Sivaprakasam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.State by
Inspector of Police
P2 Otteri Police Station, Chennai
(Cr.No.1340 of 2024)
2. The Branch Manager
Axis Bank
Choolaimedu Branch
No.242, Choolaimedu High Road
Choolaimedu, Chennai - 600 094 ... Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS,
directing the respondents 1 & 2 to defreeze the petitioner's Bank Account
No.922020006841101 in the 2nd respondent bank forthwith.
For Petitioner : M/s.K.Sruthi
For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to defreeze the
petitioner's Bank Account No.922020006841101 in the 2nd respondent bank
forthwith
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 12:03:13 pm )
2. The case of the petitioner is that an FIR came to be registered in
Cr.No.1340 of 2024 against the petitioner on 09.12.2024. Thereafter the
petitioner having been in incarceration, moved bail application and released
on bail. Having complied with the order the second respondent Bank on
31.12.2024 seems to have taken steps to freeze the Savings Bank Account
of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed
before this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that freezing of
the current bank account by the respondent police is totally unwarranted
and the same is violative of the mandatory requirements under section 102
of Cr.P.C.
4. This Court has carefully considered the submissions made on
either side and the materials available on record.
5. Freezing of Bank Accounts has been held to fall within the
purview of Section 102 of Code of Criminal Procedure since the Bank
Account is treated to be a movable property. Where the Bank Account is
freezed without notice to the concerned person and report is not
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 12:03:13 pm )
immediately sent to the jurisdictional Magistrate Court, the freezing of
Bank Accounts gets vitiated and the same requires the interference of the
Court.
6. Useful reference can be made to the judgment of the Honourable
Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs.Tapas D.Neogy
reported in 1997 (7) SCC Page 685. This Court has also taken into account
the judgment of this Court in the case of T.Subbulakshmi and another vs.
The Commissioner of Police, Chennai-8 and others reported in 2016 (2)
MWN (Cr.) 411.
7. In the present case, the Bank account has been freezed without
notice to the petitioner and without a report submitted to the Magistrate.
Therefore, the action on the part of the respondent police in freezing the
Bank accounts maintained before the 2nd respondent Bank is completely
vitiated and it is unsustainable in the eyes of law. Such view of the matter
respondent police is directed to send a communication to the second
respondent Bank to de-freeze the Bank accounts of the petitioners within a
week from today.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 12:03:13 pm )
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
8. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is
allowed.
17.09.2025
dhk
Neutral Citation :Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
To
1.Inspector of Police
P2 Otteri Police Station, Chennai
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 12:03:13 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!