Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7058 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2025
W.A(MD)No.2664 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
W.A(MD)No.2664 of 2025
A.Raju ... Died/Writ Petitioner
1.Kalaiselvi
2.Arunkumar
3.Divya ... Appellants/3rd Parties
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Madurai District,
Madurai.
2.The Special Thasildhar,
National Highways Authority,
Level 2 Office,
Madurai District. ...Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set
aside the order made in W.P.(MD)No.2987 of 2021 dated 18.10.2023 on
the file of this Court.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 02:49:42 pm )
W.A(MD)No.2664 of 2025
For Appellants : Mr.S.Sukumar
For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
Special Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
This Writ Appeal challenges an order dated 18.10.2023,
dismissing plea for Mandamus directing the District Collector and
Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition - Competent Authority), National
Highways, Madurai, to disburse enhanced compensation as per market
value for the land in Survey No.83/2A1, Rajakambiram Village, Maduri
North Taluk, Madurai District admeasuring 8.46 cents (3680 square
metres) within a designated time frame.
2.The land acquisition in question took place as early as in
2009, and in the writ affidavit, the writ petitioner makes it clear that an
award under Section 3(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956, was
passed in 2009 itself. In such circumstances, the writ petitioner has made
a representation only on 14.12.2020. The writ Court has rightly
dismissed the Writ Petition on the ground that the representation was
made 11 years after the acquisition and the passing of the award.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 02:49:42 pm )
3.We find nothing untoward in the conclusion of the writ Court
to the effect that the National Highways Act, 1956 is a complete code in
itself, providing for a comprehensive procedure, including timelines, for
seeking enhancement of compensation.
4.In such circumstances, there is no question of considering a
belated representation seeking enhancement. Accordingly, this Writ
Appeal is dismissed confirming the order of the writ Court. The proper
course of action for the appellants is to approach the competent Court
and seek enhancement of compensation in accordance with the procedure
laid down under law. No costs.
[A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,]
15.09.2025
NCC :Yes/No
Index :Yes/No
Internet :Yes
ps
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 02:49:42 pm )
To
1.The District Collector,
Madurai District,
Madurai.
2.The Special Thasildhar,
National Highways Authority,
Level 2 Office,
Madurai District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 02:49:42 pm )
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
AND
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
ps
15.09.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/09/2025 02:49:42 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!