Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Rajeswari vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 7010 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7010 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2025

Madras High Court

S. Rajeswari vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 12 September, 2025

                                                                                                  W.P.No.31995 of 2017

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED: 12/9/2025

                                                            CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

                                             Writ Petition No.31995 of 2017
                                                           and
                                        W.M.P.Nos.35152 of 2017 and 7661 of 2018

                     S. Rajeswari                                   ...                  Petitioner

                                                                  Vs

                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu
                        rep. By The Secretary to Government
                        P & AR Department
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai 600 009.
                     2. The Secretary to Government
                        School Education Department
                        Fort St. George
                        Chennai 600 009.
                     3. The Director of Elementary Education
                        College Road
                        Chennai 600 009.
                     4. The District Elementary Educational Officer
                        Namakkal District
                        Namakkal.

                     1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )
                                                                                                      W.P.No.31995 of 2017

                     5. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer
                        Namakkal District
                        Namakkal.                        ...         Respondents

                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                     for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records
                     of            the   third   and    fourth       respondents             respectively   issued     in
                     Na.Ka.No.16907/E1/2016 dated 11/8/2016 and in O.M.No.677/A3/2016
                     dated 3/3/2016 and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to
                     the respondents to step up the petitioner's pay to the level of her junior and
                     fix the same at Rs.5000 as on 9/1/96 and at Rs.22,280/- as on 12/10/2009
                     and at Rs.25,060/- as on 19/5/2012 as per                         G.O.Ms.No.125 P and AR
                     Department dated 25/3/2015 and as per Tamil Nadu Revised Pay Scale
                     Rule, 1998 and grant arrears of pay and other consequential benefits.


                                         For petitioner                 ...       Mr.R.Saseetharan
                                         For respondents                ...       Mr.P.Rajarajeswari
                                                                                  Government Advocate
                                                             ------
                                                            ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to quash the orders dated 11/8/2016

and 3/3/2016 of the third and fourth respondents issued in

Na.Ka.No.16907/E1/2016 and O.M.No.677/A3/2016 respectively, and

issue a consequential direction to the respondents to step up the petitioner's

pay to the level of her junior and fix the same at Rs.5000 as on 9/1/96 and at

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

Rs.22,280/- as on 12/10/2009 and at Rs.25,060/- as on 19/5/2012 as per

G.O.Ms.No.125 P and AR Department dated 25/3/2015 and as per Tamil

Nadu Revised Pay Scale Rule, 1998 and grant arrears of pay and other

consequential benefits.

2. The facts of the case which are necessary for the disposal of the

writ petition are as follows:-

The petitioner was initially appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on

8/7/1988 in Panchayat Union Elementary School, Valappurnadu, Kollihills

Panchayat Union, Namakkal District and thereafter, promoted as Primary

School Headmistress on 16/6/2003 and posted at Panchayat Union Primary

School at Melapatti.

3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that her junior

S.Nagalakshmi, who has also comparatively the same experience to that of

the petitioner was promoted, after she had been granted Selection Grade

Pay, while serving as Primary School Headmistress.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

4. Heard Mr.R.Saseetharan, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Ms.P.Rajarajeswari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

5. According to the petitioner, the very object of G.O.Ms.No.25 P &

AR Department (FR IV Department) dated 23/3/2015, was to rectify the

anomaly with respect to the promotion from ordinary grade to selection

grade post and the junior drawing more pay than the senior.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit

that the said S.Nagalakshmi was part of another Union as such the pay scale

of the said S.Nagalakshmi cannot be implemented in so far as the petitioner

is concerned.

7. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the

notice of this Court to a judgment dated 22/8/2023, made in (P.SANTHI

Vs. 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, REP. BY THE

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, P & AR DEPARTMENT, FORT ST.

GEORGE, CHENNAI 9), wherein the learned Single Judge under similar

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

circumstances has directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders to

step up the pay of the petitioner therein on par with the junior who was

promoted and drawing more pay, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.25.

8. Assailing the above said order, the Government has filed Writ

Appeal in W.A.No.1623 of 2024, (1. The Secretary to Government,

School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9 and 3 others

Vs P.Santhi), wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench has dismissed the Writ

Appeal, confirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

9. The main object of G.O.Ms.No.25 P & AR Department (FR IV

Department) dated 23/3/2015, is to rectify the pay anomaly due to Junior

drawing more pay than the senior in cases where the senior got promotion

before moving to Selection Grade/Special Grade and the junior got

promotion after moving to Selection Grade/Special Grade in the revised

scales of pay, drawing more pay, as a result of introduction of Tamil Nadu

Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 2009. The question of rectifying the anomaly

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

in such cases was carefully examined by the Government and passed

G.O.Ms.No.25.

10. The ground raised by the respondents that the petitioner was part

of another Union cannot be sustained. G.O.Ms.No.25 makes it clear that a

senior getting lesser pay than his/her junior due to the promotion of the

junior after moving to selection grade, has to be stepped up and make it

equal to pay of the junior.

11. It is an admitted fact that the petitioner and S.Nagalakshmi are

serving in the same Department and S.Nagalakshmi is junior to the

petitioner. It would only be appropriate that the petitioner's pay should be

fixed as equal to the pay of S.Nagalakshmi, in accordance with

G.O.Ms.No.25. Even a bare perusal of the judgment, made in W.A.No.1623

of 2024, and G.O.Ms.No.25, would make it clear that the order impugned is

unsustainable in law.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

12. Accordingly, this writ petition stands allowed and the

respondents are directed to set right the pay anomaly and step-up the pay of

the petitioner on a par with the said S.Nagalakshmi, in accordance

with G.O.Ms.No.25 P & AR Department (FR IV Department) dated

23/3/2015. The said exercise has to be carried out within a period of eight

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the respondents

require any clarification, they may issue notice to the petitioner and seek

necessary clarification and but at any rate pass orders within a period of

four months. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions

are closed.

(K.SURENDER,J) 12th September, 2025 mvs.

Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

K.SURENDER, J

mvs.

To

1. The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu P & AR Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Secretary to Government School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

3. The Director of Elementary Education College Road, Chennai 600 009.

4. The District Elementary Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.

5. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Namakkal District, Namakkal.

12/9/2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 04:30:50 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter