Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6828 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2025
W.P.Crl.No.627 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.Crl.No.627 of 2025
and WPMP.No.290 of 2025
1.D.R.Jeganathan
2.J.Balamani ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Tiruppur City, Tiruppur
2.The State rep by its
The Inspector of Police
Veerapandi Police Station, Tiruppur
3.The Tahsildar
Tiruppur South
Tiruppur
4.S.Palanisamy .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to
provide adequate police protection to the petitioners for measuring and
fencing their property comprising in S.No.445/2 situated at Veerapandi
Village, Tiruppur Taluk, Tiruppur District within a time bound manner in
view of judgement and decree dated 30.10.2024 in A.S.No.12 of 2023 on the
file of the Additional Sub Ordinate Judge at Tiruppur and requisition letter
dated 26.02.2025, 20.03.2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Myilsamy
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/09/2025 11:38:57 am )
W.P.Crl.No.627 of 2025
For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 to R3
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Mr.P.M.Duraisamy for R4
ORDER
WPMP.No.290 of 2025 has been filed permitting the petitioner to file
a single writ petition. This petition is ordered.
2. The petitioner seeks direction for police protection to survey the
land.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that the fourth respondent filed
a civil suit in O.S.No.75 of 2018 on the file of the learned District Munsif,
Tiruppur for mandatory and permanent injunection which resulted in decree
in favour of the fourth respondent and therefore, the petitioners filed first
appeal in A.S.No.12 of 2023 on the file of the learned Additional Sub Judge
at Tiruppur. Appeal was partly allowed vide decree and judgment dated
30.10.2024, wherein, the relief of permanent injunction sought by the fourth
respondent was dismissed and held that the live fence was situated on the
petitioners' property and the fourth respondent does not have any right over
the live fence. Pursuant to the same, the petitioner gave a representation to
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/09/2025 11:38:57 am )
survey the land. The Tahsildar has also sent a communication to the police to
accord necessary police protection.
4. Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned (Government Advocate) takes notice for
the respondents 1 to 3.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. As the
judgment and decree and the communication sent by the Tahsildar are not
disputed, let the police accord necessary protection for surveying the land.
6. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. No costs.
09.09.2025 dhk Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/09/2025 11:38:57 am )
dhk
To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Tiruppur City, Tiruppur
2.The State rep by its The Inspector of Police Veerapandi Police Station, Tiruppur
3.The Tahsildar Tiruppur South Tiruppur
09.09.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/09/2025 11:38:57 am )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!