Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Mangaiyarkarasi vs S.Natarajan
2025 Latest Caselaw 6767 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6767 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2025

Madras High Court

S. Mangaiyarkarasi vs S.Natarajan on 8 September, 2025

                                                                                       CRP No. 4219 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 08-09-2025

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                               CRP No. 4219 of 2025

                1. S. Mangaiyarkarasi
                W/o. Late P.S. Sundaram,
                No.8A, Valluvar Street,
                West Jones Road, West Saidapet,
                Chennai - 015.

                2.S. Venkatasubramaniam
                S/o. Late P.S. Sundaram,
                Rep. by his natural guardian and mother
                S. Mangaiyarkarasi,
                No.8A, Valluvar Street,
                West Jones Road, West Saidapet,
                Chennai - 015.

                                                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                              Vs

                1. S.Natarajan
                S/o. Late P.S. Sundaram,
                No.73/33, West Jones Road,
                West Saidapet, Chennai – 015.




                1/7



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )
                                                                                           CRP No. 4219 of 2025



                2.N. Vijayalakshmi
                No.2/3337, Kattaomman Street,
                Bharma Colony (Near C.K. Mahal),
                Navarathna Nagar, Karaikkudi,
                Sivagangai District.

                3.RAJKUMAR
                S/o. Late P.S. Sundaram,
                No.1977, Concord Avenue, Cornwall,
                Ontario, Canada - K6H6M3.

                4.S. Vimala
                D/o. Late P.S. Sundaram,
                No.2/140, 7/97, Dhanalakshmi Nagar,
                Mugalivakkam, Bhai Kadai,
                 Chennai - 125.

                5.S. Shankar Narayanan
                S/o Late P.S. Sundaram,
                No.414/5, Maragadha Sundaram Flats,
                Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam,
                Chennai - 91.

                                                                                           Respondent(s)
                PRAYER
                    This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution

                of India, to direct the learned II Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, at

                Chennai to dispose of the suit in OS No.430 of 2020 within a fixed time frame.




                                  For Petitioner(s):       Mr.M.Selvam



                2/7



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                  ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )
                                                                                         CRP No. 4219 of 2025



                                                           ORDER

Seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of the suit in OS No.430 of

2020 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai,

the petitioners/plaintiffs have preferred the present civil revision petition.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitiones would submit that the

suit is of the year 2020 and nearly five years have been lapsed. He would

further submit that the speedy disposal of the suit proceedings is just and

necessary.

3. It is pertinent to mention that High Court cannot issue such directions

for speedy disposal unless there is a justification (or) acceptable reasons for

issuing any such directions. It is relevant to cite the judgment of this Court in

S.Baby Vs. S.Sakkubai Ammal reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Mad 674,

wherein, it has been held in paragraph nos.11 and 12 as follows:

“11. In the event of issuing direction in Civil Revision

Petitions for speedy disposal without considering the number of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )

cases pending in a particular Court on Board, it will result in

discrimination against many other litigants, who all are waiting for

disposal of their respective cases. There are allegations against the

Courts that the cases are selectively picked up and disposed of. The

plight of the poor and downtrodden are also to be taken into

consideration, while disposing of the cases. The Court shall not

pave way for such feeling to the litigants. The trust on the Judicial

System is the Hallmark and any form of favouritism, nepotism or

otherwise even in the matter of hearing of cases selectively will

have larger repercussions on the system. No doubt certain cases

are to be disposed of urgently, if there is a public interest involved

or the litigants are able to establish genuine urgency for early

disposal of the cases. Such cases alone are to be given priority.

12. The practice of giving preference to any litigation without

any justification at all circumstances to be avoided. Every litigant

approaching the Court of Law is waiting for justice and thus, it

must be done in a consistent manner and without discriminating the

litigants. Therefore issuing directions indiscriminately for speedy

disposal of cases would do no service to the cause of justice. Every

urgency cannot be considered for issuing a direction for speedy

disposal, and the urgency, which is imminent alone to be

considered.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )

4. It is also relevant to cite the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra

reported in 2024 INSC 899, wherein, it has been held as follows:

“In paragraph 47.3 of the decision of a Constitution Bench of in

the case of ‘High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar

Pradesh & Ors. reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, this Court has held that

in the ordinary course, the Constitutional Courts should refrain from

fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before

any other Courts. Paragraph 47.3 reads thus:

“47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should

refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of

cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts

may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases

only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising

the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the

courts concerned where the cases are pending;” (underline

supplied)

A direction which can be issued in exceptional circumstances is being

routinely issued by High Courts without noticing the law laid down by

the Constitution Bench.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )

5. By applying the ratio laid down in the above judgments, fixing a

time-bound schedule for the Court below to dispose of the cases pending therein

is not warranted. The Court concerned is expected to regulate its own procedure

in respect of the cases on board for effective disposal and to ensure that the

cases are disposed of within a reasonable period of time.

6. In view of the same, the learned II Additional District Judge, City

Civil Court, Chennai shall dispose of the suit in O.S.No.430 of 2020 as

expeditiously as possible.

7. With the above observations, this civil revision petition stands

disposed of. No costs.

08-09-2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

To The II Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )

M.JOTHIRAMAN J.

mfa

08-09-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/09/2025 11:35:43 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter