Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Solai vs Jayaraman
2025 Latest Caselaw 7709 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7709 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2025

Madras High Court

Solai vs Jayaraman on 10 October, 2025

                                  THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                       Judgment reserved on : 19.09.2025                   Judgment pronounced on : 10.10.2025

                                                              CORAM

                                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

                                                       A.S.No.88 of 2024


                Solai                                                                          ..Appellant
                                                                   Vs.

                1.Jayaraman
                2.Vasudevan                                                                    ..Respondent

                Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC, to set aside the judgment
                and decree dated 07.09.2023 in O.S.No.79 of 2021 on the file of the Additional
                District Court, Tiruvannamalai.


                                  For Appellant         : Mr.B.Jawahar

                                  For Respondent        : No appearance



                                                          JUDGMENT

The plaintiff in O.S.No.79 of 2021 before the Additional District Judge,

Tiruvannamalai, aggrieved by the disallowed suit claim, has preferred the

above first appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )

2.Despite service of notice, the respondent has not chosen to enter

appearance, either in person or through counsel. In fact, I find that even before

the trial Court, the defendants have remained ex-parte and have not contested

the suit.

3.I have heard Mr.B.Jawahar, learned counsel for the appellant.

4.Mr.B.Jawahar, learned counsel for the appellant would state that the

suit was filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.11,51,971/-, being the amounts

payable towards principal and interest of Rs.10,00,000/- under two conditional

sale deeds dated 13.01.2020. He would invite my attention to the case of the

plaintiff that the defendants had borrowed monies from the plaintiff and they

had failed to repay the same and on persistent demands made by the plaintiff,

the 1st defendant executed a registered conditional sale deed dated 13.01.2020

for a sum of Rs.60,000/-, which was the prevailing guideline value. However,

in respect of the balance of Rs.9,40,000/-, the parties had entered into an

unregistered conditional sale deed on the same day i.e 13.01.2020. The 2 nd

defendant has signed the documents as a witness, being the son of the 1 st

defendant and according to the plaintiff, both the defendants have borrowed

monies for a total sum of Rs.10,00,000/-.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )

5.The suit has been filed for recovery of Rs.11,51,971/-, together with

future interest. The plaintiff lodged a police complaint on 17.07.2020, since the

defendants were evading repayment of the huge amount borrowed from the

plaintiff. However, the defendants, from their side, had issued a lawyer's notice

on 10.07.2020 and according to the plaintiff, the legal notice has false and

untenable allegations. The plaintiff was therefore constrained to file the suit for

recovery of money due and payable from the defendants.

6.Before the Trial Court, on the side of the plaintiff, he examined himself

as P.W.1 marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A6 and on the side of the defendants, no one was

examined and no document was marked.

7.The trial Court, finding that the unregistered conditional sale deed was

inadmissible in view of the express bar under Section 17(1)(b) of the Indian

Registration Act, held that the plaintiff is not entitled to full relief and

proceeded to decree the suit only in respect of Rs.60,000/- covered by the

registered sale deed, Ex.A2 alone.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )

8.The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that the plaintiff is

not claiming any right under the unregistered sale deed, Ex.A1 and the suit was

only for recovery of money in respect of monies paid under the said conditional

sale deed and the Court ought to have looked into the said document for

collateral purposes and proceeded to decree the suit, which is the only point

that arises for consideration in the present appeal, namely:

(i) whether the recitals in an unregistered sale deed, which otherwise is compulsorily registrable under Section 17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act, be looked into for collateral purposes to enable a party to the said document to seek recovery of monies due and payable under the said document.

9.There is no second opinion with regard to the inadmissibility of the

unregistered conditional sale deed, in view of the express embargo in Section

17(1)(b) of the Indian Registration Act. However, Section 49 of the said Act

enables the Court to look into a collateral transaction that is occurring in the

said unregistered document and for such limited purposes, even the

unregistered and inadmissible document can be looked into. The trial Court has

not even considered the mandate of Section 49 of the Act, leave alone applying

it to the facts of the present case.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )

10.The learned counsel for the appellant would only seek for the matter

being remanded to the trial Court, in order to decide the issue of whether the

unregistered condition sale deed in Ex.A1 for a sum of Rs.9,40,000/- can be

treated as a collateral transaction for the limited purposes of enabling the

plaintiff to recover the said amount of Rs.9,40,000/-. In view of the above and

also considering the fact that the respondents have not chosen to appear in this

appeal, I do not deem it proper to decide this issue in the appeal. It would be

proper for me to remit the matter to the trial Court to decide the issue, after

giving an opportunity to both the parties.

11.In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is allowed. The judgment and

decree of the Additional District Court, Tiruvannamalai, dated 07.09.2023 in

O.S.No.79 of 2021 is set aside, insofar as the dismissal of the claim arising

under Ex.A1, unregistered sale deed alone. The trial Court shall afford an

opportunity to both the plaintiff and the defendants and decide the issue as to

whether the plaintiff is entitled to rely upon the payment of Rs.9,40,000/- as a

collateral transaction entitling him to maintain the suit for recovery of monies.

There shall bo no order as to costs.


                                                                                       10.10.2025

                Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No
                Speaking / Non-speaking order
                Index    : Yes/No
                ata





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )
                                                                                        P.B.BALAJI.J,

                                                                                                     ata


                To

                The Additional District Court, Tiruvannamalai.




                                                                           Pre-delivery judgment made in





                                                                                             10.10.2025







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis           ( Uploaded on: 13/10/2025 09:59:05 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter