Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Munavar Batcha … vs M.G.Dawood Mia Khan
2025 Latest Caselaw 7625 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7625 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2025

Madras High Court

Munavar Batcha … vs M.G.Dawood Mia Khan on 8 October, 2025

                                                                                        Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED:           8/10/2025

                                                           CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

                                           Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

                     Munavar Batcha                                 …                   Petitioner


                                                                 Vs


                     1. M.G.Dawood Mia Khan
                          The Secretary & Correspondent
                          QuaideMilleth College of Men
                          Medavakkam
                          Chennai 600 100.


                     2. E. Sundaravalli, I.A.S
                          Commissioner of Collegiate Education
                          The Directorate of Collegiate Education
                          E.V.K.SampathMaligai, College Road
                          Nungambakkam
                          Chennai 34


                     Presently at


                     The Institute of Advanced Study in Education Campus
                     1/14




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm )
                                                                                        Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

                     No.577 Anna Salai, Saidapet
                     Chennai.                                      ...                  Respondents



                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,

                     1971 to initiate contempt proceeding against the respondents for willful and

                     deliberate disobeying the order dated 15/3/2017 passed in Writ Petition

                     Nos.3265 and 3266 of 2015.




                                  For petitioner            …       Mr.Akhil Ahmed Akbar Ali


                                  For respondents       …           M/s.GodsonSwaminath
                                                                   B.MarySowmiRexi
                                                                   For
                                                                   M/s.Isaac Chambers
                                                                   For R.1


                                                                   Ms.Dakshayani Reddy
                                                                   Senior Counsel
                                                          For Mr.A.Selvendran
                                                                   For R.2.


                                                           ORDER

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

This Contempt Petition has been filed to initiate contempt proceeding

against the respondents for willful and deliberate disobeying the order dated

15/3/2017 passed in Writ Petition Nos.3265 and 3266 of 2015.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner while working as

Associate Professor in the first respondent College was suspended on

21/2/201 and a charge memo was issued on 19/1/2015. Aggrieved by the

suspension order and charge memo, the petitioner had filed W.P.Nos.3265

and 3266 of 2015, respectively. Pending writ petitions, first respondent

College and the petitioner had entered into a compromise and filed a

Joint Compromise Memo dated 28/2/2017. The relevant contents of the

Joint Memo of Compromise, reads as under:-

“2. The first respondent agrees to revoke the suspension of petitioner with immediate effect and the petitioner shall be deemed to be on duty for the entire period of suspension and shall be allowed to avail all the benefits of salary, increments, counting of service for pension

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

purposes, etc. The first respondent also agrees to withdraw, revoke and cancel the charge memo issued to the petitioner and drop all disciplinary proceedings. The suspension period from 21/2/2014 to till date be treated as on regular service and full salary should be claimed from the second respondent and paid to the petitioner by the first respondent subject to the approval of this Court.

3. The petitioner has received subsistence allowance during the suspension period from 21/2/2014 to January 2017. The petitioner would claim his full salary for the above said period, from the second respondent through the first respondent subject to the approval of this Court. Further, the petitioner agrees out of the salary received for the period between 21/2/2014 to January 2017 would reimburse the subsistence allowance to the first respondent. The first respondent agrees to issue the following necessary certificate viz.,(1). The suspension revocation order (2) withdrawal of all memos (3) the relieving order (4) the last pay drawn certificate and (5) no due certificates to the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

petitioner.

4. The petitioner submits that he would pay a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- in total to the first respondent inclusive of Rs.3,68,000/- paid to the substitute staff in the absence of the petitioner from 21/2/2014 to January 2017, after the petitioner receives all the terminal benefits.

5. The petitioner is voluntarily agreeing to submit his application for Voluntary Retirement Scheme w.e.f 1/3/2017 and first respondent agreed to accept the application of VRS of the petitioner and the first respondent College authorities agreed to relieve the petitioner from

the Collee on VRS on 1st March 2017.

3. Based on the said Compromise Memo, this Court, vide, order

dated 15/3/2017, disposed of both the writ petitions. Thereafter, the

petitioner had filed a Contempt Petition No.1277 of 2019 for compliance of

the order dated 15/3/2017 made in W.P.Nos.3265 and 3266 of 2015.

4. Vide, order dated 29/1/2020, this Court had observed the fact that

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

the first respondent in compliance of the order dated 6/1/2020 have

furnished all the documents to the Department of Collegiate Education and

since the same has been acknowledged by the petitioner, closed the

Contempt Petition No.1277 of 2019.

5. The present Contempt Petition was filed on the ground that though

all the relevant documents had been filed with the second

respondent/Commissioner of Collegiate Education, and the same has been

forwarded to the Government of Tamil Nadu, the following bills have not

been sanctioned -

(i) arrears of salary for the period from March 2014 to February 2017 amounting to Rs.51.90,500/-.

(ii) Proposals for sanction of revised pension for the entire period i.e., from 21/2/2014 to 28/2/2017.

(iii) Leave salary (EL & LOPA) amounting to Rs.11,52,615/- and

(iv) Special Provident Fund

6. Heard Mr.Akhil Ahmed Akbar Ali, learned counsel for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

petitioner, Mr.GodsonSwaminath, learned counsel for the first respondent

and Ms.Dakshayani Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the second

respondent.

7. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Collegiate

Education would submit that in accordance with Section 19 of the Tamil

Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976, the period of suspension

cannot exceed two months and for two more months under exceptional

circumstances as stated in the Provision. If the enquiry is not completed

within time, the Teacher gets restored to his post automatically. The

learned Senior Counsel would further submit that during the period of

suspension, the Director of Collegiate Education has to pay the subsistence

allowance. In view of the Joint Compromise Memo, the respondent

Collegiate Education cannot be made to pay any such arrears amounting to

nearly Rs.52 lakhs or other benefits. The Director of Collegiate Education

was not a party to any of the proceedings that went on between the

petitioner and first respondent College. The petitioner was suspended on

account of sexual harassment of a Student and accordingly, charge memo

was issued. In case of such allegation of sexual harassment, no reasons are

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

given as to why the petitioner and the College has compromised and filed a

compromise memo. The acts of the petitioner and the College cannot

result in penalizing the Director of Collegiate Education asking the salary to

be paid during the suspension period.

8. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit

that it was specifically mentioned in the compromise memo that College

would withdraw the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the order

of suspension stand revoked. In such circumstances, question of denying

the salary for the suspension period does not arise.

9. Perused the materials available on record.

10. As seen from the records, the charge levelled against the

petitioner is that the petitioner has indulged in sexual harassment of a

Student and was also harassing SC Students by calling them in the name of

their caste and threatening them. In fact, the students of the College agitated

for about five days seeking action against the petitioner. The enquiry

conducted did not conclude due to non-appearance of petitioner and the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

statements of the victims are also not placed before this Court. However,

it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was suspended on account of sexual

harassment of a student and the petitioner did not attend the enquiry.

11. The reasons for entering into a compromise between the

petitioner and College are not known. As rightly pointed out by the learned

Senior Counsel, there is no basis to penalize the Director of College

Education to cough up the amount of more than Rs.52 lakhs to the

petitioner. Moreover, the Director of Collegiate Education was not a party

to the compromise filed by the writ petitioner in W.P.Nos.3265 and 3266 of

2015.

12. Under Section 19 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges

(Regulation) Act, 1976, suspension of a Teacher or any other person

employed in a Private College shall remain in force for a period of two

months and for the reasons to be recorded for another two months. The

reasoning given by the College for keeping the petitioner under suspension

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

for three years is the sexual harassment allegation made by the students. As

already said the students went on agitation seeking action against the

petitioner, however, the enquiry was not concluded.

13. The present petition is filed to initiate contempt proceedings

against the respondents for wilfully and deliberately disobeying the order

dated 15/3/2017 passed in W.P.Nos.3265 and 3266 of 2015.

14. The relevant portion of the order dated 15/3/2017 reads as

under:-

“2. When the matter is taken up for hearing,

the learned counsel for the parties submitted that

the issues pertaining to both the writ petitions have

been resolved by the parties concerned amicably

and a joint memo of compromise entered into

between the parties and the same has also been

produced before this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

3. In terms of the Joint Memo of

Compromise, both the writ petitions are disposed

of. The Joint memo of compromise shall form part

of the order. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petitions are closed.”

15. As seen from the order, there are no specific directions given to

the Directorate of Collegiate Education to pay any arrears. However,

subsequently, when Contempt Petition was filed in the year 2019, the said

Contempt Petition was closed on the ground that all the necessary

documents were furnished by the College to the Directorate of Collegiate

Education.

16. A civil Contempt involves any willful disobedience of a Court

order or judgment. In the present case, there are no specific directions

which are given to the Directorate of Collegiate Education for making any

payment to the petitioner herein, as such the question of contempt would not

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

arise.

17. According to Rule 13 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges

(Regulation) Act, 1976, it is for the College to pay subsistence allowance

every month during the period of suspension. It is not in dispute that the

petitioner had received the retirement benefits as follows:-

                                  DCRG                                 …                    Rs.10,00,000/-

                                  Commutation of Pension               …                    Rs.10,17,227/-

                                  Closure of Provident Fund            …                    Rs. 6,96,357/-
                                                                                            (Gross) after deduction
                                                                                            of Rs.4,24,000/- towards
                                                                                            advances availed net
                                                                                            amount paid to
                                                                                            Bank Account is
                                                                                            Rs.2,72,357/-.


18. In the present circumstances of the case, the Director of

Collegiate Education shall consider the sanction of revised pension for the

entire period of service, including the suspension period and also other bills

which the petitioner is lawfully entitled to.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

19. With the above observation, this Contempt Petition is disposed

of.

(K.SURENDER,J) 8/10/2025 mvs.

Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

K.SURENDER, J

mvs.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm ) Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

Contempt Petition No.1802 of 2025

8/10/2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/10/2025 07:16:49 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter