Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thowfik vs State Represented By
2025 Latest Caselaw 8537 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8537 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Madras High Court

Thowfik vs State Represented By on 12 November, 2025

Author: T.V.Thamilselvi
Bench: T.V.Thamilselvi
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                         Dated : 12.11.2025

                                                        Coram:
                                      The Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                      Crl.A.No.1702 of 2025

                     Thowfik
                                                                                               ...Appellant
                                                                  Versus
                     1.State Represented by
                       The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                       Sirkazhi Police Station,
                       Mayiladuthurai District.

                     2.State Represented by
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Sirkazhi Police Station,
                       Mayiladuthurai District.

                     3.Murugapandiyan
                                                                                            ...Respondents

                            This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14(A)(1) of SC/ST Act
                     praying to set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025 on the file of
                     District and Sessions Court, Mayiladuthurai in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025
                     dated 09.09.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with
                     Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of Inspector of Police, Sirkazhi Police
                     Station, Mayiladuthurai District, pending investigation.

                                  For Appellant           :            Mr.N.Sakthivel
                                  For Respondents – 1 & 2 :            Mr.V.Meganathan,
                                                                       Government Advocate (Crl.Side)


                     1/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                                                             JUDGMENT

                                  This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant/accused seeking

                     to set aside the Order dated 09.09.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025 passed

                     by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai and enlarge him

                     on bail in connection with Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of 2nd

                     respondent Police, pending investigation.



                                  2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.03.2025, at 7.00 p.m.,

                     when 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant and his associate members were

                     sitting on Kondal Madhagadi, appellant/accused and other co-accused came

                     there and asked about one Mr.Vinith, for which, 3rd respondent/de-facto

                     complainant replied that he did not know about said Vinith. Under these

                     circumstances, appellant/accused and other co-accused scolded the 3rd

                     respondent/de-facto complainant and his associate members in filthy

                     language by mentioning their caste name. That apart, appellant/accused

                     assaulted the 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant by using Aruvaal over his

                     right hand and the co-accused assaulted one Mr.Ramar using Aruvaal over

                     2/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                     his right hand and threatened him with dire consequences. Therefore, 3rd

                     respondent/de-facto complainant has lodged a complaint to 2nd respondent

                     Police regarding the said occurrence. Based on the complaint given by 3rd

                     respondent/de-facto complainant, 2nd respondent Police registered a case in

                     Crime No.133 of 2025 against the appellant/accused and two other co-

                     accused.



                                  3.     The learned counsel for appellant/accused submitted that 3rd

                     respondent/de-facto complainant has lodged a false complaint against the

                     appellant/accused. The appellant/accused did not commit any offences as

                     alleged by the prosecution.



                                  3.1.      It is further submitted by the learned counsel for

                     appellant/accused that appellant/accused has been in judicial custody since

                     19.03.2025 and he is ready to abide any condition to be imposed by this

                     Court. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed that this Criminal Appeal may

                     be allowed and appellant/accused may be enlarged on bail.




                     3/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                                  4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing on behalf

                     of respondents 1 & 2 submitted that 12 previous cases were registered

                     against the appellant/accused and appellant/accused is a History Sheeted

                     Rowdy in H.S.No.263 of 2016. That apart, appellant/accused was detailed

                     under Goondas Act in COC.No.15 of 2025 dated 22.04.2025, TPDA

                     No.4501 dated 23.04.2025. Therefore, the learned Government Advocate

                     (Crl.Side) submitted that he has serious objection for granting bail to the

                     appellant/accused.



                                  5. Heard the learned counsel for appellant/accused and the learned

                     Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for respondents 1 & 2.



                                  6. Despite the service of notice, none appeared on behalf of 3rd

                     respondent/de-facto complainant.



                                  7. From a perusal of the materials available on record, it is evident

                     that on the date of occurrence, appellant/accused assaulted the 3rd


                     4/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                     respondent/de-facto complainant by using Aruvaal. Hence, the aggrieved

                     3rd respondent/de-facto complainant has lodged a complaint to 2nd

                     respondent Police. Based on the complaint given by 3rd respondent/de-facto

                     complainant, 2nd respondent Police registered a case against the

                     appellant/accused         in    Crime No.133                of     2025   and   remanded   the

                     appellant/accused to judicial custody on 19.03.2025.                                Therefore,

                     appellant/accused filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025 before the

                     learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai seeking bail. However,

                     the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai vide Order dated

                     09.09.2025, dismissed the said bail petition. Hence, appellant/accused has

                     preferred the present Criminal Appeal.



                                  8. Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the period

                     of incarceration undergone by appellant/accused from the date of his arrest

                     i.e., 19.03.2025, this Court is inclined to set aside the Order dated

                     09.09.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025 and allow this Criminal Appeal by

                     granting bail to appellant/accused.




                     5/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                                  9. Accordingly, Order dated 09.09.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2025

                     passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai is set

                     aside and this Criminal Appeal is allowed. The appellant/accused is ordered

                     to be released on bail subject to the condition that he shall execute a bond

                     for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (out

                     of which, one surety should be blood surety), each for a likesum to the

                     satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayiladuthurai and

                     on further conditions that:

                                        (a) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left
                                  Thumb Impressions in the surety bonds and the learned
                                  Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar Card or Bank
                                  Pass Book and their mobile numbers to ensure their identity;
                                        (b) The appellant/accused shall deposit a sum of
                                  Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only), after deducting the
                                  amount which was already deposited by the appellant/accused,
                                  if any, to the credit of Crime No.133 of 2025, within a period
                                  of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,
                                  failing which, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.
                                        (c) On such deposit being made, 3rd respondent/de-facto
                                  complainant and other victim viz., Mr.Ramar shall withdraw
                                  Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each from the


                     6/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                                  amount deposited by appellant/accused in Crime No.133 of
                                  2025, on proper identification, in the manner known to law.
                                         (d) The appellant/accused shall stay at Thanjavur and
                                  report before the Inspector of Police, Town Police Station,
                                  Thanjavur on every Tuesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of eight
                                  weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
                                         (e) The appellant/accused shall not abscond either during
                                  investigation or trial.
                                         (f) The appellant/accused shall not tamper with evidence
                                  or witness either during investigation or trial.
                                         (g) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the
                                  learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate
                                  action against appellant/accused, in accordance with law, as if
                                  the conditions have been imposed and appellant/accused
                                  released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself
                                  as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs.
                                  State of Kerala (2005)AIR SCW 5560.
                                         (h) If appellant/accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR
                                  can be registered under Section 229A IPC.



                                                                                               12.11.2025
                     mrr
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Speaking Order (or) Non-Speaking Order


                     7/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                      ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                     To

                     1.The District and Sessions Judge,
                       Mayiladuthurai.

                     2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
                       Sirkazhi Police Station,
                       Mayiladuthurai District.

                     3.The Inspector of Police,
                       Sirkazhi Police Station,
                       Mayiladuthurai District.

                     4.The Superintendent,
                       Central Prison, Cuddalore.

                     5.The Public Prosecutor,
                       High Court, Madras.




                     8/9




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )
                                                                            T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

mrr

12.11.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 05:42:05 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter