Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Munivel vs The Member Secretary
2025 Latest Caselaw 8498 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8498 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2025

Madras High Court

Munivel vs The Member Secretary on 11 November, 2025

Author: R. Suresh Kumar
Bench: R.Suresh Kumar
                                                                                         W.A No. 3240 of 2025



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED: 11.11.2025

                                                       CORAM
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

                                                          AND

                     THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                                            W.A No.3240 of 2025
                                                    and
                                           C.M.P.No.26643 of 2025

                1.        Munivel
                          S/o.Shri Rangasamy

                2.        U.Karpagam
                          W/o.Uthokottan

                3.        C.Manimegalai @ Rebeca
                          W/o.Charlas                                                      ..Appellants
                                                                Vs

                1.        The Member Secretary
                          Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
                          Thalamuthu Natarajan Building
                          Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

                2.        The Chairman
                          Tamil Nadu Urban Habitation Board
                          Chennai-600 011.

                3.        The Commissioner
                          Corporation of Chennai
                          Rippon Building, Chennai.


                Page Nos.1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )
                                                                                         W.A No. 3240 of 2025



                4.        A.Michael
                          S/o.Late M.S.Arulanandam

                5.        A.Jesudass
                          S/o.M.S.Arulanandam

                6.        A.Arokia Swamy
                          S/o.Late M.S.Arulanandam

                7.        A.Augustine
                          S/o.Late M.S.Arulanandam

                8.        A.John
                          S/o.Late M.S.Arulanandam

                9.        A.James
                          S/o.Late M.S.Arulanandam

                10.       A.Pouline Mary
                          D/o.Late M.S.Arulnandam

                11.       J.Arokia Aruna
                          D/o.Late A. Joseph                                               ..Respondents

                          Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent to set aside the
                order passed in W.P.No.15828 of 2024 dated 24.10.2024 on the file of this
                Court and consequently, allow the above writ appeal.
                                  For Appellants      :         Mr.C.Elamurugan
                                  For Respondents :             Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali
                                                                Standing Counsel, for R1
                                                                Mr.J.Lenin
                                                                Standing Counsel, for R2
                                                                Ms.P.T.Ramadevi,


                Page Nos.2/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )
                                                                                       W.A No. 3240 of 2025



                                                              Standing Counsel, for R3
                                                              Mr.H.Shabeer Ali, for R5 & R10
                                                              Mr.P.Sidharthan, for R11


                                              JUDGMENT

(Made by HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.)

This intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 24.10.2024

passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 15828 of 2024. By the said

order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the

petitioner seeking a direction to the official respondents to consider his

representation requesting allotment of the subject property, and further, to

initiate action against the private respondents.

2. The appellants/writ petitioners claim that the subject property was

allotted in favour of the petitioner and his family members. It is stated that

although the petitioner and his family members had requested the second

respondent to execute a sale deed in their favour, the same was not executed.

The appellants further allege that certain third parties were attempting to

develop the said land by creating documents, and therefore, they submitted a

representation dated 12.09.2023 to the authorities seeking intervention.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )

3. As the said representation was not considered, the petitioner

approached this Court by filing the aforesaid writ petition. The learned Single

Judge, by the impugned order, dismissed the writ petition. Taking exception to

the same, the present intra-Court appeal has been preferred.

4. We have heard Mr. C. Elamurugan, learned counsel for the appellants;

Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent, Mr. J.

Lenin, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent, Ms. P. T.

Ramadevi, learned Standing Counsel for the third respondent, Mr. H. Shabeer

Ali, learned counsel for respondents 5 and 10, and Mr. P. Sidharthan, learned

counsel for the eleventh respondent.

5. The subject property, along with other lands, was included within an

area declared as a slum area by order dated 01.12.1972. The said order was

challenged before this Court in W.P. No. 1283 of 1989, seeking a direction to

denotify the subject land. The writ petition was allowed by order dated

10.01.1990, and the said order was confirmed in W.A. No. 272 of 1990. The

said decision has attained finality.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )

6. Consequent to the orders passed by this Court, the lands were

denotified, and therefore, as of today, the subject land no longer falls within a

slum area.

7. The original owner of the property had also filed a suit in O.S. No.

14770 of 1996, which was dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, an appeal was

preferred in A.S. No. 441 of 1998, and a cross-objection was filed in Cross

Objection No. 33 of 2000 by another person claiming rights over the subject

property. The appellate Court allowed the appeal and held that the original

purchaser/the second respondent was in possession and enjoyment of the

subject property.

8. The learned Single Judge, after considering all these aspects, held that

the appellants/writ petitioners were neither allotted the subject property nor in

possession of it. In light of the orders passed by this Court directing the official

respondents to denotify the land from the slum area and the judgment and

decree of the jurisdictional Civil Court, it is evident that the alleged allotment

in favour of the appellants had already been cancelled following the directions

issued by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )

9. Hence, no statutory duty is cast upon the official respondents to

consider the representation submitted by the appellants.

10. In view of the above, we find no illegality or infirmity in the order

dated 24.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 15828 of

2024 warranting interference by this Court.

11. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, the

connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                                  (R.S.K.,J)            (H.C., J)
                                                                                                 11.11.2025
                Index : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes/No
                Neutral Citation : Yes / No

                mk







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )





                To

                1.        The Member Secretary

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

2. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Urban Habitation Board Chennai-600 011.

3. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Building, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.,

mk

11.11.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 12:29:04 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter