Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8465 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2025
Crl.O.P.No.30421 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.30421 of 2025
R.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner
Vs.
N.Mekala ... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.
to set aside the order passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, VI
Additional City Civil Court, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.8523 of 2025 in
C.A.No.1058 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025 insofar as the condition No.7(2) is
concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramasamy
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the order
passed by the learned VI Additional Judge, VI Additional City Civil Court,
Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.8523 of 2025 in C.A.No.1058 of 2025 dated
09.09.2025, insofar as condition No.7(2) is concerned.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the
judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.07.2025, imposed by the
learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-V, Saidapet, Chennai,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 01:33:14 pm )
for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the
petitioner preferred an appeal in C.A.No.1058 of 2025, before the VI
Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, along with an application seeking
suspension of sentence pending disposal of the appeal. The learned
appellate Judge, while suspending the sentence, imposed certain conditions
and one of the conditions is that, the petitioner should deposit 20% of the
cheque amount before the trial Court within a period of two months from
the date of the order, to the credit of STC No.2747/2022. Challenging the
said condition, the present petition is filed.
3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that
though the petitioner has got a good case on merits, the learned appellate
Judge, without considering the same and without exercising his
discretionary powers, has directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the
cheque amount. The learned counsel would submit that the petitioner
without prejudice to his rights and contentions, is ready to deposit 10% of
the cheque amount and would seek for modification of the said condition.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the
petitioner, condition No.7(2), imposed by the appellate Court in
Crl.M.P.No.8523 of 2025 in C.A.No.1058 of 2025 dated 09.09.2025, is
modified to the effect that the petitioner shall deposit 10% of the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 01:33:14 pm )
compensation amount, before the trial Court to the credit of STC
No.2747/2022, within a period of four weeks from today (07.11.2025).
5. With the above modifications, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
07.11.2025 ksa-2 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No Note: Issue order copy on 11.11.2025.
To
1. The VI Additional Judge, VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai
2. The Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-V, Saidapet, Chennai
3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 01:33:14 pm )
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.
ksa-2
07.11.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 01:33:14 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!