Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Project Director vs M.Prasanna Kumar
2025 Latest Caselaw 8409 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8409 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2025

Madras High Court

The Project Director vs M.Prasanna Kumar on 6 November, 2025

Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S.M.Subramaniam, Mohammed Shaffiq
                                                                                          W.A.No.2297 of 2023
                                                                                         ---------------------------
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                 DATED: 06.11.2025
                                                         CORAM:
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                     AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                               W.A.No. 2297 of 2023
                                                       and
                                              C.M.P.No.19706 of 2023


                The Project Director,
                National Highways Authority of India,
                Project Implementation Unit – Chennai,
                “Sri Tower”, 3rd Floor, DP-34(SP),
                Industrial Estate, Guindy,
                Chennai – 600 032.                                                       ...Appellant



                                                              Vs.


                1.M.Prasanna Kumar

                2.The Arbitrator & District Collector,
                  Thiruvallur District.

                3.The Special District Revenue Officer (LA),
                  NH 205, No.3&4, LalBagadhur Sasthiri Street,
                  Periyakuppam Railway Road, Near Thulasi Theatre,
                  Thiruvallur – 602 001.                                               ...Respondents




                PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying
                to set aside the order dated 01.12.2022 in W.P.No.32384 of 2022.


                1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )
                                                                                                W.A.No.2297 of 2023
                                                                                               ---------------------------
                                     For Appellant          : Mr.SU.Srinivasan

                                     For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Saravanan for R1

                                                              Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl.GP for R2 & R3

                                                           JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The present private respondent/original writ petitioner has filed a writ

petition seeking direction against the third respondent therein to deposit

compensation amount as per award passed by Arbitrator/District Collector

under provisions of National Highways Act, 1956 and disburse the same. Writ

Court disposed of writ petition by passing following orders:

“4. Accordingly, all the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(1) The respondents are directed to deposit the enhanced compensation amount as per the Arbitral Award together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of taking possession under Section 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956, with the competent authority within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(2) If the respondents failed to obtain any interim order against the arbitral award in the Arbitration Original Petition on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruvallur within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the competent authority is directed to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

---------------------------

disburse the compensation amount which was deposited by the respondents forthwith.”

2. Learned counsel for the appellant would strenuously contend that

none of the conditions raised by the present appellant was considered by

arbitrator while passing award. Issue of limitation was subsequently raised and

same has not been addressed by arbitrator. Other factual aspects were also

raised. However, without considering grounds raised by the appellant, award

has been passed, thereby awarding an exorbitant compensation amount.

3. Appellant has filed an application under Section 34 of Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act of 1996')

challenging said award, but, due to the fact that officer in-charge to register got

changed twice, application was not registered.

4. Learned counsel would further submit that the writ petition is not

maintainable. The original petitioner could have filed an execution petition. The

learned Single Judge came to a conclusion that writ petition is not

maintainable, since there is an alternate remedy available under Section 36 of

the Act of 1996 for execution. However directed the appellant to deposit

enhanced compensation amount with interest at rate of 9% per annum and

further observed that, if any interim order against arbitral award is not obtained

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

---------------------------

within four weeks, competent authority was directed to disburse the

compensation amount. Issues are not decided on merits of the contentions

raised by appellant. The condition imposed to deposit amount and disburse

the same is an onerous one.

5. No doubt, original petitioner has a remedy of execution under Section

36 of the Act of 1996. Writ Court relied upon order of this Court dated

16.11.2021 in W.P.No.14766 of 2021 with regard to maintainability of writ

petition.

6. Be that as it may, according to the present appellant, challenge to

arbitral award is pending consideration before concerned District Judge. In

view of that, it would not be proper for this Court to comment upon merits of

arbitral award. In light thereof, we have not considered contentions of

respective parties upon merits of the arbitral award.

7. The deposit of amount would also be to the advantage of the present

appellant, inasmuch as with regard to the amount deposited, the further

interest would be arrested.

8. We may appreciate anxiety of original petitioner to receive enhanced

compensation amount and at the same time, grounds raised by present

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

---------------------------

appellant also will have to be considered by Court, dealing with application

under Section 34 of the Act of 1996. The equities will have to be adjusted.

9. The learned Single Judge had also passed further orders, which in

the opinion of this Court would be required to be modified. In light of that, this

Court passes following orders:

(i) In some of the appeals relating to this case, this Court had directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the amount of enhanced compensation, which according to the learned counsel for the appellant, has been complied with and the 50% of the amount is deposited. The 50% of the amount already deposited shall be transferred to the Court of the concerned District Judge, where the application filed by the appellants under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 is pending;

(ii) In other appeals, where the amount of 50% of the enhanced compensation amount is not deposited, the same shall be deposited by the present appellant with the concerned Court within a period of ten weeks from today (i.e., 19.12.2025);

(iii) The original petitioner is at liberty to apply for the withdrawal of the amount, which application shall be considered by the concerned District Judge, on its own merits and after hearing all parties concerned, appropriate orders shall be passed;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

---------------------------

(iv) The present appellant may also seek further orders on the stay petition before the learned District Judge;

(v) Depending upon the order, that may be passed by the learned District Judge on the application of the original petitioner for withdrawal of the amount, further steps may be taken with regard to the amount, if lying in the Court, such as to invest the same in a Nationalised Bank or otherwise.

(vi) Considering the huge amount involved, the learned District Judge, with whom the application under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 is pending, may endeavour to decide the application under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 expeditiously.

10. With these observations and directions, writ appeal stands disposed

of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                                     (S.M.S., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)
                                                                                             06.11.2025
                dsa
                Index            :Yes/No
                Neutral Citation :Yes/No
                Speaking/Non-speaking order





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

                                                                                      ---------------------------

                To

                1.The Project Director,
                  National Highways Authority of India,
                  Project Implementation Unit – Chennai,
                  “Sri Tower”, 3rd Floor, DP-34(SP),
                  Industrial Estate, Guindy,
                  Chennai – 600 032.

                2.The Arbitrator & District Collector,
                  Thiruvallur District.

3.The Special District Revenue Officer (LA), NH 205, No.3&4, LalBagadhur Sasthiri Street, Periyakuppam Railway Road, Near Thulasi Theatre, Thiruvallur – 602 001.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

---------------------------

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

dsa

06.11.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/11/2025 12:46:28 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter