Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

J.Rajeswari vs The Joint Director
2025 Latest Caselaw 4422 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4422 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2025

Madras High Court

J.Rajeswari vs The Joint Director on 26 March, 2025

                                                                                       W.P.(MD).No.22989 of 2024


                              BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED :26.03.2025

                                                             CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

                                            W.P.(MD)No.22989 of 2024 and
                                            W.M.P.(MD)No.19495 of 2024

                     1.J.Rajeswari
                     2.Geethalakshmi                                                    ... Petitioners
                                                                 -vs-

                     1.The Joint Director,
                     District Town and Country Planning,
                     Office of the District Town and Country Planning,
                     No.5, Bharathi Nagar 1st Street, Melakaram,
                     Tenkasi District-627 818.

                     2.The Assistant Director,
                     District Town and Country Planning,
                     Office of the District Town and Country Planning,
                     No.5, Bharathi Nagar 1st Street, Melakaram,
                     Tenkasi District-627 818.

                     3.The Executive Officer,
                     Arulmigu Nachiyar (Andal) Temple,
                     Srivilliputhur, Virudhungar District.                              ... Respondents
                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
                     issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pass appropriate order
                     granting final approval for the plots of the petitioners consequent to the
                     petition filed by the petitioners for approval, dated 05.12.2022 and
                     communicate the same to the petitioners and to the Panchayat and the
                     concerned officials.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )
                     1/6
                                                                                             W.P.(MD).No.22989 of 2024


                                        For Petitioners       : Mr.S.Natarajan
                                                              Senior Counsel
                                                              for Mrs.Vijayakumari Natarajan
                                        For R1 and R2         : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan
                                                              Additional Government Pleader
                                        For R3                :Mr.P,Mahadevan
                                                                  *****
                                                                   ORDER

The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:

“To issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pass

appropriate order granting final approval for the plots of the petitioners

consequent to the petition filed by the petitioners for approval, dated

05.12.2022 and communicate the same to the petitioners and to the Panchayat

and the concerned officials.”

2.The case of the petitioners is that the land in dispute originally

belongs to one Alagar Iyangar, who said to have executed a settlement deed

on 23.10.1911, making arrangements to perform 'Unjal Urchavakattalai' for

'Arulmigu Nachiyar (Andal) Temple', at Srivilliputhur. After his death, the

legal heirs succeeded to the estate and they have been performing the

'Kattalai' continuously. The Writ Petitioners have purchased the subject

property from the legal heirs of Ramanuja Iyengar, who inherited the property

from Alagar Iyengar, in the year 1990.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )

3.According to the petitioners, after purchase, they continue to perform

'Kattalai' and the property never vested with the Temple. Subsequently, as

contemplated under Section 21 of Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and

Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, (30 of 1963), the petitioners have paid the

amount in lieu of Kattalai. Thereafter, the Temple have filed a suit in O.S.No.

310 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil, to

set aside the sale deed made in favour of the writ petitioners. In the meantime,

the petitioners wanted to alienate the property and executed sale deeds in

favour of 3rd parties and also submitted the same before the Sub Registrar

concerned. But the Sub-Registrar refused to register the documents stating

that an objection has been raised by the Temple and a civil suit is also

pending between the parties and that until the dispute is resolved, the

documents cannot be registered. Thereafter, the petitioners have filed a Writ

Petition bearing W.P.(MD)No.5244 of 2011 seeking a direction from this

Court to direct the Sub Registrar to register the documents. The said Writ

Petition was allowed by this Court and the appeal preferred as against the

saud order of this Court was dismissed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this

Court.

4.Now, it is the grievance of the petitioners that even though the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )

petitioners have executed a gift deed for surrendering the land meant for

pathway and other common area, the application, dated 05.12.2022, made by

the petitioners before the first respondent for regularisation of the plots is

pending without consideration for a long period and hence, the present Writ

Petition.

5.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that as

against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.310 of 2008 on the file of

Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankoil, the respondent Temple has

preferred an appeal in A.S.No.5 of 2022 before the Subordinate Court at

Sankarankovil. Since the appeal suit is pending with regard to the subject

land, the respondents 1 and 2 are not in a position to proceed further and as

per the judgment and decree to be passed in the appeal suit, the respondents 1

and 2 will act in accordance with law.

6.Considering the submission made by the learned Additional

Government Pleader, this Court is of the view that when a proceedings is

pending before the civil Court with regard to the subject property, it is not

appropriate on the part of the official respondents to take a decision on their

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )

own on the application made by the petitioners for regularisation of the plots

in the subject property. In such view of the matter, the Writ Petition is

dismissed. It is open to the respondents 1 and 2 to take a decision on the

application made by the petitioners after the disposal of the appeal suit and if

necessary, respondents 1 and 2 shall direct the petitioners to submit a fresh

application and consider the same on merits and in accordance with law. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.





                                                                                                     26.03.2025
                     NCC          : Yes/No
                     Index        : Yes / No

                     cmr


                     To:-

                     1.The Joint Director,
                     District Town and Country Planning,

Office of the District Town and Country Planning, No.5, Bharathi Nagar 1st Street, Melakaram, Tenkasi District-627 818.

2.The Assistant Director, District Town and Country Planning, Office of the District Town and Country Planning, No.5, Bharathi Nagar 1st Street, Melakaram, Tenkasi District-627 818.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

cmr

Order made in

26.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:09:14 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter