Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Gurunathan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 4280 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4280 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2025

Madras High Court

M.Gurunathan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 21 March, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                                        W.P.No.7439 of 2025
                                                                                        --------------------------


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED : 21.03.2025
                                                         CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                            AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
                                               W.P.No.7439 of 2025

                M.Gurunathan                                                           ... Petitioner
                                                              Vs.
                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                 Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
                 Home (Courts) Department,
                 Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

                2.The Registrar General,
                 High Court of Madras,
                 Chennai - 104.

                3.The Secretary,
                 Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
                 Frazer Bridge Road,
                 V.O.C. Nagar, Chennai - 3.                                            ... Respondents


                PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                praying to issue a Writ of Mandamu, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider
                the petitioner to the post of Civil Judge in view forbearing the respondents from
                interfering the peacefully under the category of OL, clause 17(b)(viii) of the
                advertisement No.661 and Notification No.12/2023 dated 01.06.2023 issued by
                the 3rd respondent after the due consultation of the 3rd respondent in view of
                the judgment in 2013 (5) MLJ, Page No.438.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )
                --------------------
                Page No.: 1 of 7
                                                                                           W.P.No.7439 of 2025
                                                                                           -------------------------




                          For Petitioner                       : Mr.P.Vijendran
                          For Respondents                      : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,
                                                                 Government Advocate for R1

                                                                 Mr.E.Chandrasekaran,
                                                                 Standing Counsel for R2

                                                                 Mr.R.Bharanidharan,
                                                                 Standing Counsel for R3


                                                             ******
                                                         ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The petitioner questions his non-selection and seeks a Mandamus to

direct the 3rd respondent to consider him for appointment to the post of civil

Judge.

2. The petitioner comes under the category of persons with disability.

His disability is a locomotor disability and the percentage of disability is 55%

which qualifies as bench mark disability for reservation provided for under the

Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )

--------------------

--------------------------

3. Under the said Act a reservation of 4% has to be made for persons with

disabilities and the same will have to be again sub-divided into four heads viz,

a) persons with blindness and low vision;

b) persons who are deaf or hard of hearing;

c) locomotor disability including cerbral palsy, leprosy cured, dwarfism,

acid attack victims and muscular dystrohy;

d) autizm, intellectual disability, specific learning disability and mental

illness.

4. The reservation that is made is 4% of seats for persons with benchmark

disability. The Act requires the reservation of 4% to be made in any

Government employment and out of the said 4%, 1% each shall be reserved for

blindness and low vision, deaf and hard of hearing, locomotor disability

including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured, dwarfism, acid attack victims and

muscular dystrophy contained in clauses (a) to (c) of sub-Section 1 of Section

34 of the Act and 1% is to be given to people with autism, intellectual

disability, specific learning disability and mental illness and multiple

disabilities from amongst persons in clause (d) as provided for under Clauses

(d) and (e) of sub-Section 1 of Section 34.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )

--------------------

-------------------------

5. As per the notification of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,

there were 9 posts available for persons with disabilities in the recruitment that

was conducted for selection of Civil Judges - Junior Division in the year 2024.

The breakup of the TNPSC is as follows:

                 Sl.                   Notified                   Reg No of            Rank    Mark         DA
                 No                      DAP                       Selected                               Category
                  .                    Vacancies                  Candidates
                                            Carried Forward Vacancies (DAP)
                 1      GT(G)(LV)_C/F-1                          2501002058 122               263.500 Mud
                 2      BC(G)(LD/LC/DF/AC)_C/F-1 2601003059 271                               242.842 LD(OL)
                 3      SC(G)(HH)_C/F-1                          0101007076 390               225.000 LD(OA)
                                                   Regular Vacancies (DAP)
                 4      GT(G)(HH)-1                              Unfilled due to paucity of candidate.
                 5      GT(W)(LD)(Others)-1                      0101001172 379               227.500 LD(OL)
                 6      BC(W)(HH)-1                              Unfilled due to paucity of candidate.
                 7      MBC/DC(G)(LV)-1                          Unfilled due to paucity of candidate.
                 8      MBC/DC(G)(LD)(Others)-1                  2501004085 288               240.500 LD(OA)
                 9      SC(W)(LV)-1                              Unfilled due to paucity of candidate.



6. Section 34(2) of the Act mandates that if persons are not available for

any particular vacancy then the said vacancy shall be carried forward to the

next recruitment year and only if no suitable person is available in the next

recruitment year could it be interchanged with persons with other disabilities.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )

--------------------

--------------------------

7. In the present recruitment the carried forward vacancies were filled up

with candidates who had scored higher marks than the petitioner. In the regular

vacancies four posts were left unfilled due to paucity of candidates. They fall

either under persons hard of hearing or persons with low vision. These

vacancies being current vacancies, cannot be filled up with persons with other

disabilities by interchanging. The Act mandates that the vacancy should be

carried forward at least for 1 year.

8. Though Mr.P.Vijendran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

would submit that we must decide this issue with our head and heart put

together and we see some force in his contention. We find that the provisions of

the Act which are mandatory in nature prevent us from exercising any

discretion in this regard. We are therefore unable to lend a helping hand to the

petitioner.

9. The writ petition therefore fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No

costs.

                                                                                  (R.S.M.,J.)        (G.A.M.,J.)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )
                --------------------


                                                                                         -------------------------




                                                                                        21.03.2025
                dsa
                Index                  : No
                Neutral Citation       : No
                Speaking order

                To
                1.The Secretary,
                 Government of Tamil Nadu,
                 Home (Courts) Department,
                 Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

                2.The Registrar General,
                 High Court of Madras,
                 Chennai - 104.

                3.The Secretary,

Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Chennai - 3.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )

--------------------

--------------------------

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

dsa

W.P.No7439 of 2025

21.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/03/2025 05:38:50 pm )

--------------------

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter