Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kulanthai Selvam vs P.C.Chandran
2025 Latest Caselaw 4207 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4207 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2025

Madras High Court

Kulanthai Selvam vs P.C.Chandran on 20 March, 2025

Author: G.R.Swaminathan
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan
                                                                                      W.A(MD) No.1449 of 2022


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 Dated : 20.03.2025

                                                        CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
                                              AND
                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                           W.A(MD) No.1449 of 2022
                                                     and
                                          C.M.P.(MD)No.11679 of 2022

                     1.Kulanthai Selvam

                     2.M.Pandi

                     3.R.Vijayakumar

                     4.S.Sureshkumar

                     5.M.Mookusamy

                     6.K.Kannan                ... Appellants / Respondents 6,9,10,11,12&13


                                                             Vs
                     1.P.C.Chandran

                     2.Krishnan               ... 1st & 2nd Respondents / 1st & 2nd Respondents

                     3.The Commissioner,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments,
                       Nungampakkam High Road,
                       Chennai-34.



                     1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )
                                                                                       W.A(MD) No.1449 of 2022


                     4.The Joint Commissioner,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments,
                       Madurai,
                       Madurai District.

                     5.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments,
                       Madurai,
                       Madurai District.

                     6.The Inspector,
                       Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments,
                       Madurai,
                       Madurai District.         ... Respondents 3 to 6 / Respondents 1 to 4

                     7.Mahalingam

                     8.R.Murugan

                     9.M.Venkatesan                          ... Respondents / Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying
                     this Court to set aside the Judgment dated 30.03.2022 in W.P.(MD)No.
                     2409 of 2022 on the file of this Court.


                                  For Appellant          : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan


                                  For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajasekar
                                                   for R1, R2 & R7
                                                  : Mr.M.Saravanan
                                                    for R8 & R9
                                                  : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan
                                                    Additional Government Pleader
                                                     for R3 to R6

                     2/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )
                                                                                              W.A(MD) No.1449 of 2022



                                                                 ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

Heard both sides.

2. The case on hand pertains to the management of Arulmighu

Ayyanar and Sonai Karuppannasamy Thirukovil, Pappakudi Village,

Madurai District. The writ petitioners filed W.P.(MD)No.2409 of 2022

for directing the official respondents to ensure that the hereditary trustees

are appointed as per the scheme earlier framed. The learned single Judge

vide order dated 30.03.2022 disposed of the writ petition in the following

terms:-

“3. Under these circumstances, I dispose this writ petition by directing the Joint Commissioner to dispose O.A.No.19 of 2021, in which the petitioners have impleaded themselves as respondents. This exercise shall be carried out by the second respondent within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The second respondent is therefore directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law keeping in mind the provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 and Constitution of India and other enactments that are applicable.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )

Aggrieved by the said order, this writ appeal has been filed by the

appellant who figured as the 6th respondent in the writ petition.

3. When we posed a question as to why against an order directing

disposal of an application, the writ appeal has been filed, the learned

counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that in Paragraph No.2 of

the order, certain adverse findings have been given. The said findings

stand vacated. We direct the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department,

Madurai to club all the OAs (O.A.No.9 of 2021, O.A.No.45 of 2021 &

O.A.No.7 of 2025) and dispose them within six months. The Joint

Commissioner shall not ask for any extension of time. All the parties are

strictly directed to extend their co-operation. If any one of the parties

fails to co-operate, they will be set exparte. The matter will be disposed

of on merits. The writ petitioners are entitled to place reliance on the

order dated 12.12.1977 made in O.A.No.29 of 1977. Likewise, the

appellant herein can also collaterally question it. The Joint

Commissioner will issue notices to all the interested parties before

passing final order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )

4. The Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                      (G.R.S., J.)     (M.J.R., J.)
                                                                               20.03.2025

                     Index : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     NCC : Yes / No
                     rmi

                     To

                     1.The Commissioner,

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nungampakkam High Road, Chennai-34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madurai, Madurai District.

4.The Inspector, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madurai, Madurai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

rmi

20.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/04/2025 05:56:52 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter