Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4058 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2025
W.A.No. 50 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.A.No. 50 of 2025
and
C.M.P.No. 330 of 2025
1.The Secretary to Government
Municipal Administration
and Water Supply Department,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration,
M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram,
Chennai - 28.
3.The Regional Director of
Municipal Administration,
Vellore - 12.
4.The Commissioner
Ambur Municipality
Ambur, Vellore District. ... Appellants
Vs.
M.Shanmugam ...Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the
order dated 06.02.2020 made in W.P.No.4627 of 2011.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 05:30:41 pm )
W.A.No. 50 of 2025
For Appellants : Mr.C.Selvaraj
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthappan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
We do not see any merit in the appeal. Admittedly, the respondent
was engaged as a Gang Mazdoor from 1983 and he was posted as
Watchman-cum-Feeder to cattle with effect from 29.07.1988 and he was
working in that category till he attained the age of superannuation in the
year 2015. His demand for regularization was rejected on the ground that
his appointment was contrary to G.O.Ms.No.644 dated 12.10.1979.
2. The respondent cannot be blamed for violation of the G.O. If the
appellants appointed him and paid him salary from the contingency funds
and he has also been made as Watchman-cum-feeder to cattle with effect
from 29.07.1988, the fact that initial appointment was irregular cannot be a
ground to refuse regularization. The question of regularization itself arises
only in respect of irregular appointments. In as much as the respondent is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 05:30:41 pm )
covered by G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 28.02.2006, the learned Judge has held he
should be regularized from the date of completion of 10 years from the date,
on which, he was appointed as a Watchman-cum-Feeder i.e., on 29.07.1988.
Therefore, the services of the appellant should be regularized only with
effect from 29.07.1998 and he would be entitled to monetary benefits. We
see no reason to take a different view in as much as the respondent is clearly
covered G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 28.02.2006. This Writ Appeal therefore, fails
and it is accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.)
17.03.2025
kkn
Index: No
Speaking order
Neutral Citation : No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 05:30:41 pm )
To:
1.The Secretary to Government
Municipal Administration
and Water Supply Department,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai - 28.
3.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore - 12.
4.The Commissioner Ambur Municipality Ambur, Vellore District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 05:30:41 pm )
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and G. ARUL MURUGAN, J.
KKN
and
17.03.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 05:30:41 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!