Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manikandan vs Gomathi
2025 Latest Caselaw 4044 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4044 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2025

Madras High Court

Manikandan vs Gomathi on 17 March, 2025

Author: R.Vijayakumar
Bench: R.Vijayakumar
                                                                                        C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 17.03.2025

                                                           CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                         C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024
                                                     and
                                           C.M.P(MD)No.5328 of 2024

                1.Manikandan
                2.Velmurugan
                3.Sankar
                                             ...Petitioners/Petitioners/Respondents/Defendants

                                                     Vs.

                1.Gomathi
                2.Natarajan                          ...Respondents/Respondents/Petitioner/
                                                            Decree Holder/Auction Purchaser

                PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
                India, the Fair and Executable order passed by the learned Principal Subordinate
                Judge, Tenkasi, in E.A.No.2/2023 in E.P.No.90/2021 in O.S.No.205 of 2016
                dated 30.01.2024.
                                      For Petitioners         : M/s.P.Shanmugam
                                      For Respondents : Mr.N.Vignesh for R1
                                                        No appearance for R2
                                                  *****

                                                        ORDER

The judgment debtors in O.S.No.205 of 2016, on the file of the Principal

Sub Court, Tenkasi, are the revision petitioners herein.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 03:36:26 pm )

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024

2.A perusal of the records reveal that the said suit had been filed by the

mother as against her three sons seeking maintenance. A decree came to be

passed by the trial Court directing the three sons to pay a sum of Rs.2,500/-

each to the mother as maintenance. A charge decree was passed over the suit

schedule properties. The defendants had preferred an appeal in A.S.No.32 of

2019, before the Additional District and Session Court, Tenkasi. In the appeal,

though the maintenance amount was confirmed, the charge decree was set aside.

3.Alleging non-payment of maintenance amount, the mother had filed

E.P.No.90 of 2021. The property was brought to sale on 24.03.2023. Before the

sale could be confirmed, the defendants had filed E.A.No.2 of 2023, under

Order 21 Rule 90 to set aside the sale on the ground that there are irregularities

in the conduct of the sale. The executing Court after considering the

submissions made on either side, has proceeded to dismiss the application on

the ground that the alleged irregularities have not been made out. Challenging

the same, the present revision petition has been filed.

4.Pending revision petition, the entire arrears of maintenance amount

upto 08.01.2025, has been paid by the sons in favour of the mother. Considering

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 03:36:26 pm )

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024

the said facts, the judgment debtor had prayed for allowing E.A.No.2 of 2023

and to set aside the sale.

5.The learned Counsel appearing for the decree holder/mother had

contended that, in case, if there is any default in future, they will not be able to

bring the property for sale again, in case, if the execution proceedings are

terminated.

6.Though the auction purchaser was served, and his name is printed in the

cause list, he has not chosen to appear either in person or through Counsel.

Considering the fact that so far auction sale has not been confirmed, he is not a

necessary party to the revision petition for setting the sale.

7.As of now, the entire arrears of maintenance amount upto 08.01.2025,

have been paid. Considering the above said circumstances, the sale that took

place on 24.03.2023, shall stand set aside. However, E.P.No.90 of 2021, shall

be kept in abeyance with liberty to the decree holder to revive the said E.P., in

case of any default for more than three months in payment of monthly

maintenance amount.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 03:36:26 pm )

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024

8.The learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioners has handed

over the Demand Draft for a sum of Rs.1,88,255/-, to the learned Counsel

appearing for the decree holder before this Court.

9.With the above said observations, this Civil Revision Petition stands

disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also

closed.

17.03.2025

Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No RJR

To

The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tenkasi.

Copy to:-

The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 03:36:26 pm )

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

RJR

C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.983 of 2024

17.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 03:36:26 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter