Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4025 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2025
W.A(MD)No.2406 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.03.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
W.A(MD)No.2406 of 2024
and
CMP(MD)No.16578 of 2024
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board,
Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus,
Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.
2. The Chairperson,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board,
Sub-Committee, Madurai Centre, Madurai. ... Appellants
vs.
M.Priya ... Respondent
PRAYER : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
Patent, against the order dated 18.03.2024 made in W.P(MD)No.2971 of
2024.
For Appellants : Mr.Veera Kathiravan
Additional Advocate General, assisted by
Mr.M.Sarangan
Additional Government Pleader
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
1/6
W.A(MD)No.2406 of 2024
For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatesan
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.)
This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 18.03.2024
made in W.P(MD)No.2971 of 2024.
2. Earlier on 17.02.2025, when the batch of writ appeals came
up for hearing, considering the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the writ petitioners that the digital measurement was not
done in a proper manner, we directed the appellants to re-do the process
of digital measurement for measuring the height of the writ petitioners.
The said order is extracted hereunder:
''The batch of writ appeals in WA(MD)Nos.2406 to 2497 & 2406 of 2024 have been preferred against the order of the writ Court passed in WP(MD)No.2971 of 2024 batch, dated 18.03.2024, thereby directed the officials to relax the required height measurement to an extent of 0.5 cm for the purpose of height measurement in the physical measurement test and to qualify them for the purpose of recruitment.
2. Other two writ appeals in WA(MD)Nos.1070 and 1090 of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
2024 have been preferred against the same order of the writ Court passed in WP(MD)No.2971 of 2024 batch, dated 18.03.2024, thereby dismissed the relevant writ petitions holding that the petitioners therein would not come within the zone of consideration by acquiring required height of 170 cm on relaxation, even if they would be given with relaxation to the extent of 0.5 cm with respect to height measurement.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board (TNUSRB), would state that digital measurement has been followed to have accurate height measurement, to all the candidates who have participated in recruitment process.
4. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the candidates / writ petitioners, would state that the digital measurement was not done in a proper manner and would pray to do the same once again.
5. The Additional Advocate General would state that if the Court so directs, then the said procedure would be done once again.
6. Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court hereby directs the Chairman of the Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board (TNUSRB), to do digital (height) measurement once again for all the writ petitioners, who are aggrieved before this Court and file a report before this Court on or before 17.03.2025. The authorities shall fix a place in Chennai and shall communicate the re-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
doing process of digital (height) measurement to all the writ petitioners, who are before this Court. In the meanwhile, the writ petitioners shall not precipitate the contempt petition till the report is filed by the Government.
7. Post the matter on 17.03.2025.''
3. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General has filed a
compliance report stating that as per the orders of this Court, the digital
measurement has been done to re-measure the height of the respondent.
On re-measurement, the height of the respondent herein/writ petitioner
was found to be 158.4 and she has not come within the zone of
consideration.
4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Appeal is allowed
and the order of the Writ Court dated 18.03.2024 made in W.P(MD)No.
2971 of 2024 is set aside. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
[J.N.B, J.] [S.S.Y, J.]
17.03.2025
Index : Yes / No
Neutral Citation : Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
bala
To
1.The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner of Police Office Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.
2. The Chairperson, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Sub-Committee, Madurai Centre, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
J.NISHA BANU, J.
AND S.SRIMATHY, J.
bala
JUDGMENT MADE IN
DATED : 17.03.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:11 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!