Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The District Collector vs Sundara Lakshmi
2025 Latest Caselaw 3691 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3691 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2025

Madras High Court

The District Collector vs Sundara Lakshmi on 7 March, 2025

Author: S.Srimathy
Bench: J. Nisha Banu, S.Srimathy
                                                                                       W.A.(MD)No.614 of 2024



                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED : 07.03.2025

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU
                                                   and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

                                             W.A(MD)No.614 of 2024
                                                      and
                                            C.M.P.(MD)No.4323 of 2024
                The District Collector,
                Office of Collectorate,
                Karur.                                                                   ... Appellant
                                                                Vs.

                1.Sundara Lakshmi

                2.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                  Represented by its Secretary,
                  State of Highways Department,
                  St. George Fort, Chennai.

                3.The Divisional Engineer,
                  Highways Department,
                  Karur.

                4.The Inspector of Police,
                  Velayuthampalayam Police Station,
                  Velayuthampalayam,
                  Karur.                                                                 ... Respondents

                Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent against the order
                of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.17958 of 2023, dated 19.12.2023.


                1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )
                                                                                             W.A.(MD)No.614 of 2024



                                            For Appellants            :M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushia
                                                                       Special Government Pleader
                                            For R1                    :Mr.J.Madhu
                                            For R2 and R3             :Mr.J.Ashok
                                                                       Additional Government Pleader
                                            For R4                    :Mr.A.Albert James
                                                                       Government Advocate
                                                                   ***


                                                           JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.SRIMATHY, J.)

The present writ appeal is filed by the District Collector against the

order passed in W.P.(MD)No.17958 of 2023, dated 19.12.2023.

2. The writ petition was filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified

Mandamus, to quash the order, dated 05.10.2020 and to direct the respondents

to pay compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the death of petitioner's husband

namely Raman.

3. The brief facts as stated in the writ petition are that the writ

petitioner's husband was doing coconut business. On 13.06.2020, the writ

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

petitioner's husband and daughter were returning in his two-wheeler. Due to

heavy rain, a tree on the road side fell on the writ petitioner's husband and he

sustained grievous injuries on his chest and various parts of the body. a police

complaint was preferred on next day, i.e., on 14.06.2020, but no FIR was

registered. The writ petitioner's husband was given treatment in the government

hospital. Due to the said accident, the writ petitioner's husband lost senses

below the chest part. For further treatment, he was admitted in Karur Medical

College Hospital and thereafter he was treated as outpatient. Subsequently, his

condition deteriorated and he was admitted in Karur Medical College and he

died on 16.12.2020.

4. The contention of the writ petitioner is that the accident took place

due to lack of maintenance of trees by the 3rd respondent Highways

Department. Hence the writ petitioner submitted a representation to the 2nd

respondent District Collector on 14.08.2020 seeking compensation and the 2nd

respondent forwarded the same on 02.09.2020 to 3rd respondent. The 3rd

respondent, vide order, dated 05.10.2020, rejected the claim of compensation,

since the tree had fallen down by the act of God. Further the respondents had

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

not responded to the claim of compensation after the death of the writ

petitioner's husband. Again, the writ petitioner preferred police compliant in

FIR in Crime No.777 of 2020, dated 17.12.2020, under Section 174 of Criminal

Procedure Code. Since the respondents in the writ petition failed to consider

the same, the writ petitioner submitted a representation to the Chief Minister

Cell on 22.03.2023. Thereafter, the impugned order in the writ petition, dated

05.10.2020, was passed rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner.

5. The respondents had filed counter affidavit stating that on receipt

of the representation, the writ petitioner was directed to approach the 4th

respondent Inspector of Police to get a recommendation from him. The writ

petitioner failed to do so. Further, the writ petitioner's husband was admitted in

hospital and he was treated in the hospital. Thereafter, he was treated as

outpatient and the reason for his death is Septicemia and not due to the falling

of tree. Even if it is considered, the writ petitioner's husband died due to the

falling of tree, it is only an act of God and the respondents in the writ petition

are not responsible to pay any compensation.

6. After considering the rival submissions, the Writ Court has held

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

that the G.O.(Ms).No.246, Revenue and Disaster Management, dated

03.08.2017 and G.O.(Ms).No.579, dated 09.12.2023, are applicable and has

granted Rs.4,00,000/- as compensation with a condition if the 2nd respondent in

the writ petition failed to pay the same within twelve weeks, the same shall

carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Aggrieved over the same, the

present writ appeal is filed by the 2nd respondent District Collector.

7. The contention of the appellant is that the Writ Court has rightly

held that the Highways Department cannot be held responsible for the accident.

When the Court has held that the Highways Department cannot be made liable,

but had held the government ought to assume responsibility for the said

accident and granted compensation, but the awarding compensation is against

the finding that the Highways Department is not liable. Further, the

G.O.Ms.No.246, Revenue and Disaster Management, dated 03.08.2017, states

that the compensation can be granted for the purpose of grievous injury to the

tune of Rs.12,700/- only.

8. After hearing the rival submission, this Court is of the considered

opinion that as rightly pointed out by the appellant, the writ petitioner is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

entitled to compensation for grievous injury alone as per G.O. When the writ

petitioner's husband has survived for more than 6 months, thereafter he had

died due to Septicemia, then the appellant cannot be made responsible to pay

the compensation for the death which had occurred after 6 months. The

compensation is only for the grievous injury due to accident occurred at that

moment and not for death which happened long time after the accident. There is

no direct link between the accident and the death. Since the death is due to

Septicemia, it cannot be directly linked to the accident.

9. The writ petitioner submitted that the subsequent G.O. is

applicable for quantifying the compensation. It is seen the government issued

G.O.Ms.No.246, Revenue and Disaster Management, dated 03.08.2017 and

G.O.Ms.No.579, Revenue and Disaster Management dated 09.12.2023. Since

the accident occurred in the year 2020, G.O.Ms.No.246, may be applicable

since on the date of accident i.e. on 13.06.2020 the said G.O. was in force. And

the subsequent G.O.Ms.No.579, dated 09.12.2023, may not be applicable. In

G.O.Ms.No.246 under clause 'C', for grievous injury the compensation is fixed

as Rs.12,700/-. Since the writ petitioner is entitled to interest for belated

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

payment of compensation. However, this Court is of the considered opinion

rather than granting interest, this Court is fixing the compensation as Rs.

50,000/- as full and final settlement. The compensation of Rs.50,000/- shall be

paid by the appellant herein within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order. If the amount is paid beyond the period of eight weeks,

the same shall carry interest at 6% percent per annum.

10. With the above said observations, the writ appeal is disposed of.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                          [J.N.B., J.]     [S.S.Y., J.]
                                                                      07.03.2025
                Index         : Yes / No

                Tmg





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )




                To:

                1.The District Collector,
                  Office of Collectorate,
                  Karur.

                2.The Secretary,
                  State of Highways Department,
                  St.George Fort, Chennai.

                3.The Divisional Engineer,
                  Highways Department,
                  Karur.

                4.The Inspector of Police,
                  Velayuthampalayam Police Station,
                  Velayuthampalayam,
                  Karur.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )




                                                                                J.NISHA BANU, J.
                                                                                               and
                                                                                  S.SRIMATHY, J.

                                                                                               Tmg









                                                                                         07.03.2025





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/03/2025 12:16:12 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter