Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs B.Ilamparithi
2025 Latest Caselaw 3549 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3549 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2025

Madras High Court

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs B.Ilamparithi on 4 March, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                                         W.A.No.583 of 2025
                                                                                         ------------------------

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED : 04.03.2025
                                                         CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                            AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
                                               W.A.No.583 of 2025
                                                      and
                                              C.M.P.No.4692 of 2025

                1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
                 Represented by its Secretary,
                 Rural Development and Panchayat,
                 Raj Department, Fort St. George,
                 Chennai.

                2.The Director,
                 Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
                 Panagal Maligai, Saidapet,
                 Chennai.

                3.The District Collector,
                 Vellore District.                                                     ... Appellants



                                                              Vs.


                B.Ilamparithi                                                          ... Respondent


                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to
                set aside the order dated 23.04.2024 made in W.P.No.13563 of 2022 and allow
                the Writ Appeal.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )
                ----------------------
                Page No.: 1 of 6
                                                                                              W.A.No.583 of 2025
                                                                                              ------------------------




                                      For Appellants      : Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh,
                                                            Additional Government Pleader
                                      For Respondent      : Mr.P.Nethaji


                                                                  *****

                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The issue is one with reference to regularization of a person who was

appointed on compassionate grounds. The reasons for non-regularization cited

by the respondents are,

(i) The petitioner did not complete the Bhavanisagar training and

(ii) He did not produce the Death Certificates of his mother and brother.

2. As regards the first reason the issue is covered by the judgment of this

Court in The State of Tamil Nadu and another Vs. K.Socrates and another

made in W.A.Nos.1640 and 1641 of 2017 dated 01.03.2023, wherein, it has

been held as follows:-

"In view of the aforesaid categorical pronouncements of this Court, it has to be concluded that neither the delay in sending a

---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )

------------------------

person for training at the Bhavanisagar Institution nor the non- fulfilment of required period of service in the feeder category could be a ground to deny promotion unless it is shown that the particular employee was responsible for the same. We have given the dates above, from which it could be seen that at least there was a delay of 5 years in regularising the services of the respondents who were appointed on compassionate grounds. That delay is definitely attributed to the Authorities. "

3. The Division Bench has also referred to other decisions on the subject

viz., G.Sonaimuthu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, made in WA(MD)

No.1006 of 2016, The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and another

Vs. S.Sasisivanandam and the judgment in Government of Tamil Nadu Vs.

K.Anbalagan and others made in W.A.No.2682 of 2019. As per the above

pronouncements, if it is found that the individual was sent for training belatedly

that cannot be a ground to refuse regularization of his services. The writ Court

has, as of fact, found that the employee was sent for training only in the year

2016 and therefore he cannot be blamed for non-completion of training within a

specified period.

4. With regard to second reason viz., non-production of death certificates,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )

----------------------

------------------------

the very reason is flimsy. The employee was appointed on compassionate

ground, even while appointing him, the death certificates of his mother and

brother were verified by the Department. Therefore, the second ground on

which the regularization is denied is also unjust.

5. We therefore see no reason to interfere with the orders of the writ

Court. The Writ Appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                            (R.S.M.,J.)         (G.A.M.,J.)
                                                                                          04.03.2025
              dsa
              Index                   : No
              Neutral Citation        : No
              Speaking order




              ---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )

                                                                                      ------------------------

                To
                1.The Secretary,
                 State of Tamil Nadu,
                 Rural Development and Panchayat,
                 Raj Department, Fort St. George,
                 Chennai.

                2.The Director,

Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Vellore District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )

----------------------

------------------------

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

dsa

04.03.2025

---------------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/03/2025 03:54:39 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter