Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3523 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2025
WA(MD). No.455 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date : 04/03/2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
WA(MD). No.455 of 2025
and CMP(MD) No.3608 of 2025
Pitchai ... Appellant
v.
1.Rakku
2.The District Collector
O/o.the District Collector
Sivagangai District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District
4.The Sub-Registrar
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District
5.The Tahsildar
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District ... Respondents
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/03/2025 12:03:46 pm )
WA(MD). No.455 of 2025
PRAYER :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters patent against
the order of this Court dated 07.02.2025 in WP(MD). No.3217 of 2025.
For Appellants : Mr.K.Sankar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan for R2 to R6
Additional Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J.NISHA BANU,J.)
The writ appeal is directed against the order of the writ Court dated
07.02.2025 in WP(MD) No.3217 of 2025.
2. The 6th respondent in the writ petition is the appellant herein.
3. The writ petitioner/first respondent herein had filed the writ
petition challenging the impugned order of the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar,
in and by which, the patta standing in the name of the writ petitioner was
cancelled and a fresh patta was issued in favour of the 6 th respondent.
The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition by remitting the
matter back to the 4th respondent/Tahsildar therein for fresh disposal for
fresh hearing and disposal on the simple ground that principles of natural
justice has been violated in not hearing the writ petitioner before
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/03/2025 12:03:46 pm )
cancelling the name of the petitioner in the patta. Challenging the said
order, the appellant is before this Court.
4. It is the stand of the learned counsel for the appellant that the
writ petition has been decided at the admission stage itself and without
hearing the appellant herein. The learned counsel would further submit
that the 1st respondent has suppressed the material facts in the writ
petition and that the Tahsildar has rightly issued patta in favour of the
appellant herein and hence, prays for interference of the order of the writ
Court.
5. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the
materials available on record.
6. From the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, it
is seen that the writ Court while allowing the writ petition filed by the 1st
respondent has remitted the matter back to the Tahsildar for fresh hearing
and disposal and the Tahsildar was also directed to hear not only the writ
petitioner but also the appellant herein and pass orders after giving
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/03/2025 12:03:46 pm )
opportunity to both the writ petitioner and the appellant herein.
Therefore, the ground that has been raised is not a valid one that the
appellant. Hence, no interference is warranted to the order of the writ
Court. Accordingly, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[J.N.B.,J] [S.S.Y.,J]
04.03.2025
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
RR
To
2.The District Collector
O/o.the District Collector
Sivagangai District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District
4.The Sub-Registrar
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District
5.The Tahsildar
Sivagangai Taluk
Sivagangai District
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/03/2025 12:03:46 pm )
J.NISHA BANU, J
AND
S.SRIMATHY, J.
RR
ORDER
IN
Date : 04/03/2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 07/03/2025 12:03:46 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!