Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sharmila vs The Secretary To The Government
2025 Latest Caselaw 5142 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5142 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Sharmila vs The Secretary To The Government on 20 June, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                            HCP.No.682 of 2025

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 20.06.2025

                                                           CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                                              AND
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                  H.C.P.No.682 of 2025

                     Sharmila
                                                                          Petitioner(s) /wife of the detenue

                                                                 Vs

                     1. The Secretary to the Government,
                     Home Prohibition and Excise
                     Department, Secretariat, Chennai
                     -600 009.

                     2.Commissioner of Police/Detaining
                     Authority
                     Avadi City.

                     3.The Superintendent,
                     Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai
                     District.

                     4.State Rep.By,
                     The Inspector of Police
                     Ambattur Police Station, Chennai
                     District.

                                                                            Respondent(s)


                     Page 1 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )
                                                                                              HCP.No.682 of 2025




                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in Connection with the
                     order or Detention passed by the 2nd Respondent dated 21.02.2025 in
                     No.28/BCDFGISSSV/2025 against the petitioner's husband Rajesh Kumar
                     @ Rajesh, aged 21 years, son of Rajendran,, confined at Central Prison,
                     Puzhal, Chennai and set aside the same and consequently direct the
                     Respondents to produce the detenue before the Court and set him at liberty.



                                        For Petitioner                  : Mr.A. Saranraj


                                        For Respondents                 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak
                                                                          Additional Public Prosecutor


                                                                  ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

The petitioner herein, who is the wife of the detenu, Rajesh Kumar @

Rajesh, aged 21 years, son of Rajendran,, confined at Central Prison,

Puzhal, Chennai, has come forward with this petition challenging the

detention order passed by the second respondent dated 21.02.2025 issued

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )

against her son, branding him as "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu

Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders,

Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders,

Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act,

1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 31.12.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 21.02.2025. This fact is

not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura',

reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )

from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise,

between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble

Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link, between the

grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in arresting the

detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is extracted

hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar

Banik's case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs.

Principal Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC

OnLine Mad 6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from

the date of arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and

proximate link between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had

quashed the detention order on this ground.

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu',

reported in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of

36 days in passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would

snap the live and proximate link between the grounds and purpose of

detention. Hence, in view of the unexplained and inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention, after the arrest of the detenu, the detention

order in the present case, is liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent

on 21.02.2025 in No.28/BCDFGISSSV/2025, is hereby set aside and the

Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Rajesh Kumar @

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )

Rajesh, aged 21 years, son of Rajendran,, confined at Central Prison,

Puzhal, Chennai, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his

confinement is required in connection with any other case.

                                                                           [M.S.R., J]       [V.L.N., J]
                                                                                    20.06.2025
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Speaking/Non-speaking order
                     Internet: Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation: Yes/No
                     Anu


                     To

                     1. The Secretary to the Government,
                     Home Prohibition and Excise
                     Department, Secretariat, Chennai
                     -600 009.

                     2.Commissioner of Police/Detaining
                     Authority
                     Avadi City.

                     3.The Superintendent,
                     Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai
                     District.

                     4.The Inspector of Police
                     Ambattur Police Station, Chennai
                     District.









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )


                     5.The Joint Secretary,
                     Law and Order Department,
                     Secretariat, Chennai

                     6.The Public Prosecutor,
                       High Court, Madras.









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )




                                                                          M.S.RAMESH, J.
                                                                                    and
                                                                V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
                                                                                   Anu









                                                                                       20.06.2025









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis    ( Uploaded on: 26/06/2025 04:52:26 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter