Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tamilarasan vs The District Collector
2025 Latest Caselaw 4988 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4988 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Tamilarasan vs The District Collector on 17 June, 2025

Author: M.Sundar
Bench: M.Sundar
                                                                                               W.P.No.19504 of 2025

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED : 17.06.2025

                                                                 CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                    and
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

                                               W.P.No.19504 of 2025
                                                        and
                                  W.M.P. No.21797 of 2025 in W.P. No.19504 of 2025


                     Tamilarasan                                                                       ... Petitioner


                                                                     Vs.

                     1.The District Collector
                       Thiruvannamalai District.

                     2.The Thasildhar,
                       Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

                     3.The Commissioner,
                       Polur Municipality,
                       Polur Town & Taluk,
                       Thiruvannamalai District.                                                     ... Respondents



                                  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India

                     praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned notice vide

                     Na.Ka.No.236/2025/A1               dated        07.05.2025             issued    by   the    3rd

                     respondent.


                     Page Nos.1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )
                                                                                           W.P.No.19504 of 2025



                                       For Petitioner        :        Mr.V.Vijayakumar

                                       For Respondents :              Mr.T.K.Saravanan,
                                                                      Additional Government Pleader


                                                                 ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,]

Captioned main 'Writ Petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of

brevity) has been filed with a prayer seeking issue of a writ of

certiorari assailing a 'notice/order dated 07.05.2025 bearing reference

Na.Ka.No.236/2025/A1 made by R3 [Commissioner, Polur Municipality,

Polur Town & Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District]' which shall hereinafter

be referred to as 'impugned order' for the sake of convenience and

clarity.

2. Mr.V.Vijayakumar, learned counsel for writ petitioner submits

that the impugned order does not consider the writ petitioner's

response to the show cause notice under Section 128 (1)(b) of 'The

Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 (Act 9 of 1999)' (hereinafter

'TNULB Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity).

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

3. Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned State counsel for respondents

submits that a show cause notice dated 22.04.2025 has been issued to

the writ petitioner by R3 under Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act.

Learned State counsel also points out that the writ petitioner has

responded to the show cause notice by way of a detailed response

dated 28.04.2025 and this response will now be considered and an

order will be made by R3 in accordance with proviso to Section

128(1)(b) of TNULB Act.

4. Before we proceed further, we deem it appropriate to extract

and reproduce Section 128 of TNULB Act in its entirety and the same

reads as follows:

'128. Power to remove encroachment from public place. -

(1) The Commissioner may, -

(a) remove without any notice any movable temporary structure, enclosure, stall, booth, any article whatsoever hawked, exposed or displayed for sale or any other thing whatsoever by way of encroaching street, public place, water body, tank, other water resources or any land belonging to or vested with the municipality with the municipal limit;

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

(b) remove any immovable structure whether permanent or of temporary nature encroaching street, public place, water body, tank, other water resources or any land belonging to municipality or vested with the municipality within the municipal limit, after issuing a show cause notice for such removal, returnable within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt thereof:

Provided that the Commissioner shall consider any representation received within the time limit, before passing final orders.

(2) Whoever makes any encroachment in any land or space (not being private property) in any public street, water body, tank, other water resources or any land belonging to or vested with the municipality within the municipal limit, shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to [fifty thousand rupees]:

Provided that the Court may, for any adequate or special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year.'

5. In the light of the statutory scheme put in place vide Section

128 of TNULB Act, show cause notice under Section 128(1)(b) of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

TNULB Act dated 22.04.2025 has been issued, writ petitioner/noticee

has responded to the same on 28.04.2025, this means that R3 should

consider the response of the writ petitioner and pass what is described

as 'final orders' vide proviso to Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act. The

impugned order certainly does not qualify as 'final orders' within the

meaning of proviso to Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act. Therefore, we

have no hesitation in interfering and dislodging the impugned order on

this short point.

6. In the light of the narrative, discussion and dispositive

reasoning thus far, impugned order dated 07.05.2025 bearing

reference Na.Ka.No.236/2025/A1 is set aside. R3 shall now consider

the writ petitioner's aforereferred response dated 28.04.2025

(response to 22.04.2025 show cause notice) and pass 'final orders'

within the meaning of proviso to Section 128(1)(b) of TNULB Act as

expeditiously as the business of R3 permits but in any event within six

weeks from today i.e., on or before 29.07.2025. Orders so made shall

be duly served on the writ petitioner under due acknowledgement

within seven working days from the date of the order. If such final

orders of R3 is in favour of the writ petitioner that would be curtains

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

on the matter but if it is adverse to the writ petitioner, the same shall

be kept in abeyance for a fortnight from the date of service of 'final

orders' on the writ petitioner so as to enable the writ petitioner to seek

judicial review, if so advised and so desired.

7. Captioned WP is disposed of in the aforesaid manner i.e.,

acceding to the certiorari prayer albeit with aforementioned

observations and further directives. Consequently, captioned Writ

Miscellaneous Petition (WMP) thereat is disposed of as closed. There

shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                                 (M.S.,J.)          (H.C.,J.)
                                                                                         17.06.2025
                     Index : Yes / No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes / No
                     mmi

                     To

                     1.The District Collector
                       Thiruvannamalai District.

                     2.The Thasildhar,

Polur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.The Commissioner, Polur Municipality, Polur Town & Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.,

mmi

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

17.06.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2025 04:28:07 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter