Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thimmappan vs The State By The Inspector Of Police
2025 Latest Caselaw 4817 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4817 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Thimmappan vs The State By The Inspector Of Police on 13 June, 2025

Author: G.K.Ilanthiraiyan
Bench: G.K.Ilanthiraiyan
                                                                                         Crl.A.No.178 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 13.06.2025

                                                           CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                                  Crl.A.No.178 of 2023

                     Thimmappan                                                          ... Appellant
                                                                Vs.

                     1. The State by the Inspector of Police,
                     Mahendiramangalam Police Staion,
                     Dharmapuri District.
                     (Crime No.806/202)

                     2. Mutulakshmi
                     (R2 impleaded as per order dated
                     28.02.2023 in Crl.M.P.2952/2023
                     in Crl.A.No.178/2023)                                               ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., to
                     call for the entire records in connection with the Spl.S.C.No.67 of 2020
                     on the file of the learned Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram,
                     Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District and set aside the judgment dated
                     29.08.2022.
                                     For Appellant   : Mr.E.Kannadasan
                                     For Respondents
                                           For R1    : Mr.S.Rajakumar
                                                       Additional Public Prosecutor

                                          For R2           : No appearance




                     Page 1 of 10


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )
                                                                                            Crl.A.No.178 of 2023

                                                          JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal has been filed as against the order

dated 29.08.2022, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track

Magalir Neethimandram, Dharmapuri, in Spl.S.C.No.67 of 2020, thereby

convicted the petitioner for the offences 450 & 506(i) of IPC and Section

5(l) r/w. 6(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act

(hereinafter referred to as “the POCSO Act”) and Section 3(2)(v) of the

Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015

(hereinafter referred to as “the SC/ST Act”).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.11.2020, at about 9

am., with an intention to commit penetrative sexual assault on the victim

girl, the appellant trespassed into her house and took her to the Kitchen.

Thereafter, he had committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim

girl. He also threatened her with dire consequences if she disclosed it to

anybody. The same was continued on several occasions. The parents of

the victim girl were out of station for their occupation and utilizing the

said circumstances, the appellant had committed penetrative sexual

assault on the victim girl.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

3. On receipt of the complaint, the first respondent registered

the FIR in Crime No.806 of 2020 for the offences under Sections 449,

506(1) of IPC, Sections 3, 4(2) of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) of

the SC/ST Act. After completion of investigation, the first respondent

filed final report and the same has been taken cognizance in

Spl.S.C.No.67 of 2020 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast

Track Magalir Neethimandram, Dharmapuri.

4. In order to bring the charges to home, the prosecution had

examined P.W.1 to P.W.26 and also marked documents in Ex.P.1 to

Ex.P.22. One material objection was also marked as M.O.1. On the side

of the accused, no one was examined and no documents were marked. On

perusal of the oral and documentary evidence, the trial Court convicted

the appellant for the offences under Sections 450 & 506(i) of IPC and

Section 5(l) r/w. 6(1) of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the

SC/ST Act and sentenced him as follows :-

                      S.No.            Conviction                                    Sentence
                          1        Section 450 of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
                                                      period of five years and to pay fine of

Rs.3,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )



                      S.No.            Conviction                                    Sentence
                          2        Section 506(1) of       to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
                                   IPC                     period of one year and to pay fine of

Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

3 Section 5(l) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a r/w.6(1) of POCSO period of twenty year and to pay fine of Act Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year.

4 Section 3(2)(v) of to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a SC/ST Act period of five years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

The above sentences are ordered to run concurrently. Aggrieved by the

same, the appellant filed the present appeal.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted

that even according to the case of the prosecution P.W.4, P.W.5, P.W.6

and P.W.8 informed the parents of the victim girl and lodged complaint.

There was a delay in lodgment of complaint. The occurrence took place

on 03.11.2020. Whereas the complaint was lodged only on 06.11.2020.

There was absolutely no explanation for the belated complaint. The

evidence of P.W.1 was not corroborated with the doctor who examined

the victim girl. The doctor was examined as P.W.18 and she deposed that

there was no injury on the private part, breast and other part of her body.

However, her hymen was not intact and it was happened due to some

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

other reasons. Therefore, the prosecution failed to prove the offence

under Section 5(l) r/w 6(1) of the POCSO Act.

5.1. Insofar as the SC/ST Act is concerned, even as per the

prosecution, the appellant never abused the victim by using her caste

name. Therefore, the offence under Section SC/ST Act is not at all

attracted against the appellant. Even assuming that the case of the

prosecution is true, the appellant had made an attempt as such the offence

punishable under Section 5(l) r/w 6(1) of the POCSO Act and other

offences are not at all attracted as against the appellant.

6. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent/State raised serious objection and contended

that the evidences recorded from the prosecution witnesses would prove

the case of the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. According to him,

interference of this Court is not necessary in the findings arrived at by the

trial Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

7. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

perused the materials placed before this Court.

8. On perusal of the records, it is revealed that on 03.11.2020 at

about 9.00 p.m., while the victim girl was sleeping along with her

younger sisters and brothers, the appellant trespassed into her house and

after providing briyani to them, the appellant had taken the victim girl to

Kitchen. Thereafter, he had committed penetrative sexual assault on the

victim girl. It was seen by the prosecution witness P.W. 4, P.W.5, P.W.6

and P.W.8, who are neighbors. Though they did not support the case of

the prosecution, the victim evidence is as follows :-

@vd; mk;kh mg;gh vd;dplk; VjhtJ ngr ntz;Lk; vd;why; jpk;kg;gd; nghd; K:yk; jhd;

                                  ngRthh;fs;/                  jpk;kg;gd;                       nghid
                                  vLj;Jbfhz;Lte;J                 bfhLg;ghh;/                ehd;     xU

tUlj;jpw;F Kd;g[ taRf;F te;njd;/ jpk;kg;gd; iel; 09/30 kzpf;F te;J vd; mk;kh nghd;

                                  ngRfpwhh;fs;     vd;W         bfhz;Lte;J                   bfhLg;ghh;/
                                  mg;nghJ        jpk;kg;gd;           nghijapy;                ,Ug;ghh;/
                                  vdf;F     rpf;fd;       iu!;          th';fpbfhz;L                te;J

bfhLg;ghh;/ mij ehd; vd; jk;gp. j';iffs; rhg;gpLnthk;/ mjd;gpwF eh';fs; vy;nyhUk; J}';fptpLnthk;/ jpk;kg;gd; vg;go tUthh; vd;W

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

bjhpahJ/ Mdhy; te;J thapy; Jzpia fl;o vd;id fpr;rDf;F Tl;ongha;tpLthh;/ fpr;rDf;F Tl;o ngha;tpLthh;/ fpr;rDf;F Tl;ongha; ehd; nghl;oUf;Fk; iel;oia J}f;fptpl;L vd; $l;oia mt[j;JtpLthh;/ jpk;kg;gd; mtuJ Frpia vLj;J ehd;

bu!;l;U:k; nghu ,lj;jpy tr;R tr;R vLg;ghh;/ ,Jnghy;; xU thuk; bra;jhh;/ ,e;j jftiy vd; mk;kh. mg;ghtplk; brhd;dhy; fj;jpia itj;J fGj;ij mWj;JtpLntd; vd;W brhd;dhh;/ 03/11/2020k; njjp iel; 09/30 kzpf;F gf;fj;JtPl;Lfhu';f jpk;kg;gd; jpdKk; tUtij fjt[ tHpahf te;J ghh;j;jhh;fs;/@ Thus it is clear that the appellant had committed penetrative sexual

assault on the victim girl.

9. Further the doctor who treated the victim girl was examined

as P.W.18. She deposed as follows :-

                                           @fle;j       03/11/2020k;          njjp             ,ut[     09/30
                                  kzpf;F             jd;Dila                        tPl;oy;              jd;
                                  rnfhjphpfSld;               cw';fpbfhz;oUe;j                         nghJ
                                  mtuJ         gf;fj;J        tPl;Lfhuuhd               38      taJila
                                  jpk;kg;gd;      vd;gth;       jd;Dila                tPl;ow;F        te;J
                                  jd;id           rikay;            miwf;F                 J}f;fpbrd;W
                                  rpWkpapd;       thapy;      Jzpia             itj;J            milj;J
                                  khh;g[       kw;Wk;         cly;           KGtJk;                   bjhl;L




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                      ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )


                                  Kj;jkpl;ljhft[k;.                rpWkpapd;               cs;shilia
                                  fHw;wp       mtuJ                 Mz;Fwpia                      rpWkpapd;

gpwg;g[Wg;gpy; itj;jjhft[k;. gpd;dh; m';fpUe;J Xotpl;ljhf Twpdhh;/ nkw;go rpWkpia ghpnrhjid bra;jjpy; cly;. ,U bjhilfs;.

khh;g[ kw;Wk; gpwg;g[Wg;gpd; btspgFjpapy; foj;j fhaKk;. ef fPunyh. rpuha;g;g[ fhaKk;

                                  fhzg;gltpy;iy/                      mtuJ                      gpwg;g[Wg;gpy;
                                  ghpnrhjid                    bra;jjpy;                         fd;dpjpiu
                                  nrjkile;jpUe;jJ/                  gpwg;g[Wg;gpy;               xU      tpuy;
                                  EiHaToa               mstpw;F                ,Ue;jJ/                 nkw;go
                                  rpWkpapd;        gpwg;g[Wg;g[       jlty;           nrfhpj;J            jla
                                  mwptpay;          Ma;tfj;jpw;F                   mDg;gpitj;njd;/

jla mwptpay; Ma;tfj;jpy; ,Ue;J fpilj;j Ma;twpf;ifapd; go nkw;go rpWkpapd;

                                  gpwg;g[Wg;gpy;                tpe;jQqf;fs;                           vJt[k;
                                  fhzg;gltpy;iy             vd;W         mwpf;if                bgwg;gl;lJ/
                                  nkw;go                   rpWkpapd;                             fd;dpjpiu

nrjkile;jpUe;jJ/ rpWkpapd; cly; KGtJk;

vt;tpj foj;j fhankh. effPunyh. rpuha;g;g[ fhankh fhzg;gltpy;iy vd;Wk;. gpwg;g[Wg;gpy; tpe;jQqf;fs; vJt[k; fhzg;gltpy;iy vd;Wk;.

kUj;Jt ghpnrhjid mwpf;if tH';fpndd;/ tpgj;J gjpntL efy; m/j/rh/M/13/ tpLtpg;g[ rhd;W m/j/rh/M/14/ jla mwptpay; Ma;tf mwpf;if m/j/rh/M/15/ kUj;Jt ghpnrhjid mwpf;if m/j/rh/M/16/ nghyPrhh; vd;id tprhhpj;jhh;fs;@

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

Thus it is clear that the evidence of P.W.18 is clearly corroborated with

the evidence of P.W.1. Though the doctor did not find any injury on her

private part as well as on her body, her hymen was not intact. Hence, the

prosecution proved the charges beyond any doubt and the trial Court

rightly convicted the appellant and this Court finds no infirmity or

illegality in the order passed by the trial Court. Hence, the appeal fails

and it is liable to be dismissed.

10. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed.




                                                                                                 13.06.2025

                     Index            : Yes/No
                     Neutral citation : Yes/No
                     Speaking/non-speaking order

                     rts







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )




                                                                           G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
                                                                                             rts

                     To

                     1. The Sessions Judge,
                     Fast Track Magalir Neethimandram,
                     Dharmapuri.

                     2. The Inspector of Police,
                     Mahendiramangalam Police Staion,
                     Dharmapuri District.

                     3. The Public Prosecutor,
                     Madras High Court,
                     Chennai.









                                                                                                13.06.2025







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 15/07/2025 01:28:56 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter