Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prabakaran vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 450 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 450 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Prabakaran vs The Additional Chief Secretary To ... on 3 June, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                       HCP No. 553 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 03-06-2025

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                            AND
                       THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                HCP No. 553 of 2025



                Prabakaran
                                                                                       Petitioner

                Vs

                1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
                Home, Prohibition And Excise Department,
                Secretariat, Chennai-9.

                2.The District Collector And District Magistrate,
                Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

                3.The Superintendent Of Police,
                Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

                4.The Superintendent, Central Prison,
                Coimbatore.

                5.The Inspector Of Police
                Mettupalyam All Women Police Station,
                Coimbatore District.
                                                                                       Respondents




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )
                                                                                             HCP No. 553 of 2025



                PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue

                a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in Cr. M.P.No.69/S.O/2024 on

                the file of the second respondent, quash the detention order dated 09.11.2024

                and direct the respondent to produce of the detenue Vijakaumar son of

                Balakrishnan Das presently detained as a Sexual Offender at the Central Prison,

                Coimbatore, under the Tami Nadu Act of 1982 before this Court and set him at

                liberty.



                                  For Petitioner            : Mr.K.R.Samratt

                                  For Respondents          : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                               ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.Ramesh J.)

The petitioner herein, who is the brother of the detenu namely

Vijayakumar aged about 36 years, has come forward with this petition

challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated

09.11.2024 issued against his brother, branding him as "Goonda" under the

Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law

Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic

Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel

for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order

of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 08.10.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 09.11.2024. This fact is not

disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura', reported

in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay from the date

of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise, between the date of

detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that

the live and proximate link, between the grounds and the purpose of detention,

stands snapped in arresting the detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court is extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if

there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of

detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner

from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of

detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a

considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite

subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the

detention order and consequently render the detention order bad

and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the

grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in

arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is

unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and

circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar Banik's

case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs. Principal

Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC OnLine Mad

6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from the date of

arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and proximate link

between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had quashed the detention

order on this ground.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu', reported

in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of 36 days in

passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would snap the live and

proximate link between the grounds and purpose of detention. Hence, in view

of the unexplained and inordinate delay in passing the order of detention, after

the arrest of the detenu, the detention order in the present case, is liable to be

quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent on

09.11.2024 in Cr.M.P.No.69/S.C/2024, is hereby set aside and the Habeas

Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Vijayakumar, aged about 36 years,

S/o.Balakrishnan, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his

confinement is required in connection with any other case.

(M.S.RAMESH J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.) 03-06-2025

nl

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary To Government Home, Prohibition And Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The District Collector And District Magistrate Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3.The Superintendent Of Police Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison Coimbatore.

5.The Inspector Of Police Mettupalyam All Women Police Station, Coimbatore District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

M.S.RAMESH J.

AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

nl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

03-06-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/06/2025 02:08:06 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter