Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chand vs The Secretary To The Government
2025 Latest Caselaw 436 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 436 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Chand vs The Secretary To The Government on 3 June, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                                HCP No. 3093 of 2024




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 03-06-2025

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                            AND
                       THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                               HCP No. 3093 of 2024
                Chand

                                                                                       Petitioner

                                                              Vs

                1. The Secretary To The Government
                Home Prohibition And Excise Dept,
                Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

                2.District Magistrate And District Collector
                Namakkal District Namakkal.

                3.The Superintendent Of Police,
                Namakkal Distric, Namakkal

                4.The Superintendent Of Prison
                Central Prison, Salem.

                5.The Inspector Of Police
                Veppadai Police Station, Namakkal District.

                                                                                       Respondent(s)


                PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )
                                                                                             HCP No. 3093 of 2024



                a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order

                detention passed by the second respondent dated 12.11.2024 in C.MP. No. 65/

                GOONDA/2024 against the petitioner father Mohamed Ikram, Male aged 42

                years S/O. Abdul Hameed, who is confined at central prison, Salem and set

                aside and direct the respondent to produce the detenue before the Court and set

                him at liberty.


                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.D.Balaji

                                  For Respondents          : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                       ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.Ramesh J.)

The petitioner herein, who is the father of the detenu namely Mohamed

Ikram aged about 42 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the

detention order passed by the second respondent dated 12.11.2024 issued

against his brother-in-law, branding him as "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu

Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug

Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand

Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982

[Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel

for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order

of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 27.09.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 12.11.2024. This fact is not

disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura', reported

in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay from the date

of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise, between the date of

detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that

the live and proximate link, between the grounds and the purpose of detention,

stands snapped in arresting the detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court is extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if

there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of

detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner

from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of

detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a

considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite

subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the

detention order and consequently render the detention order bad

and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the

grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in

arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is

unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and

circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar Banik's

case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs. Principal

Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC OnLine Mad

6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from the date of

arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and proximate link

between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had quashed the detention

order on this ground.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu', reported

in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of 36 days in

passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would snap the live and

proximate link between the grounds and purpose of detention. Hence, in view

of the unexplained and inordinate delay in passing the order of detention, after

the arrest of the detenu, the detention order in the present case, is liable to be

quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent on

12.11.2024 in C.M.P.No.65/GOONDA/2024/(M1), is hereby set aside and the

Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Mohamed Ikram, aged

about 42 years, S/o.Abdul Hameed, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith,

unless his confinement is required in connection with any other case.

(M.S.RAMESH J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.) 03-06-2025

nl

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

To

1.The Secretary To The Government Home Prohibition And Excise Dept, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

2.District Magistrate And District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

3.The Superintendent Of Police, Namakkal Distric, Namakkal

4.The Superintendent Of Prison Central Prison, Salem.

5.The Inspector Of Police Veppadai Police Station, Namakkal District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

M.S.RAMESH J.

AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

nl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

03-06-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter