Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Iqbal vs The Secretary To The Government
2025 Latest Caselaw 435 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 435 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Iqbal vs The Secretary To The Government on 3 June, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                                HCP No. 3120 of 2024




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 03-06-2025

                                                         CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                            AND
                       THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                               HCP No. 3120 of 2024
                Iqbal
                                                                                       Petitioner

                                                              Vs

                1. The Secretary To The Government
                Home Prohibition And Excise Department,
                Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

                2.District Magistrate And District Collector,
                Namakkal District, Namakkal.

                3.The Superintendent Of Police,
                Namakkal District, Namakkal

                4.The Superintendent Of Prison,
                Central Prison, Salem.

                5.The Inspector Of Police
                Veppadai Police Station, Namakkal District.

                                                                                       Respondents

                PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue

                a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )
                                                                                             HCP No. 3120 of 2024



                detention passed by the second respondent dated 12.11.2024 in CMP. No. 67/

                GOONDA/2024/(M1) against the petitioner's brother-in-law, Asurudheen alias

                Asuruali, male aged 30 years S/o. Kapla, who is confined at Central Prison,

                Salem and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the detenue

                before the Court and set him at liberty.



                                  For Petitioner           : Mr.D.Balaji

                                  For Respondents          : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                     ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.Ramesh J.) The petitioner herein, who is the brother-in-law of the detenu namely

Asurudheen alies Asuruali aged about 30 years, has come forward with this

petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated

12.11.2024 issued against his brother-in-law, branding him as "Goonda" under

the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law

Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic

Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates

Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned counsel

for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in passing the order

of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 27.09.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 12.11.2024. This fact is not

disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura', reported

in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay from the date

of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise, between the date of

detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that

the live and proximate link, between the grounds and the purpose of detention,

stands snapped in arresting the detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court is extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above

decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if

there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner

from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of

detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a

considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite

subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the

detention order and consequently render the detention order bad

and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the

grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in

arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is

unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and

circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar Banik's

case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs. Principal

Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC OnLine Mad

6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from the date of

arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and proximate link

between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had quashed the detention

order on this ground.

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu', reported

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of 36 days in

passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would snap the live and

proximate link between the grounds and purpose of detention. Hence, in view

of the unexplained and inordinate delay in passing the order of detention, after

the arrest of the detenu, the detention order in the present case, is liable to be

quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent on

12.11.2024 in C.M.P.No.67/GOONDA/2024/(M1), is hereby set aside and the

Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Asurudheen alias Asuruali,

aged about 30 years, S/o.Kapla, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless

his confinement is required in connection with any other case.

(M.S.RAMESH J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.) 03-06-2025

nl

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

To

1.The Secretary To The Government Home Prohibition And Excise Dept Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

2.District Magistrate And District Collector Namakkal District, Namakkal.

3.The Superintendent Of Police Namakkal District, Namakkal.

4.The Superintendent Of Prison Central Prison, Salem

5.The Inspectro Of Police Veppadai Police Station, Namakkal District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

M.S.RAMESH J.

AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

nl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

03-06-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/06/2025 08:56:12 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter