Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gayathri vs The Additional Chief Secretary To The ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1244 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1244 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Gayathri vs The Additional Chief Secretary To The ... on 9 June, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                       H.C.P.No.360 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 09.06.2025

                                                        CORAM :

                               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                               AND
                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                H.C.P.No.360 of 2025

                    Gayathri                                                              ... Petitioner

                                                              Vs.

                    1.The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government
                    Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
                    Secretariat
                    Chennai 600 009

                    2.The Commissioner of Police
                    Greater Chennai
                    Office of the Commissioner of Police
                    (Goondas Section)
                    Vepery, Chennai - 7

                    3.The Superintendent
                    Special Cell for women
                    Central Prisons
                    Puzhal, Chennai

                    4.The Inspector of Police
                    G-2, Secretariat Colony Police Station
                    Chennai                                                            ... Respondents




                    Page 1 of 7




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )
                                                                                          H.C.P.No.360 of 2025




                    PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                    issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records relating to the
                    detention order vide D.O.No.29/ BCDFGISSSV/2025, dated 23.01.2025
                    passed by the second respondent and quash the same and direct the
                    respondents to produce the detenue viz. Nagavalli, aged about 39 years,
                    wife of Sekar, confined at Special Prison for women, Puzhal, Chnnai and
                    set her at liberty.
                                    For Petitioner                  : Mr.K.Murali

                                    For Respondents                 : Mr.E.Raj Thilak
                                                                      Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                             ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

The petitioner herein, who is the daughter of detenue viz. Nagavalli,

aged about 39 years, W/o.Sekar, has come forward with this petition

challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated

23.01.2025 slapped on her mother, branding her as "Drug Offender" under

the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber

Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral

Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )

Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenu was arrested on 15.12.2024 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 23.01.2025. This fact

is not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura',

reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay

from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise,

between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble

Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link, between the

grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in arresting the

detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )

extracted hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar

Banik's case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi

Vs. Principal Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023

SCC OnLine Mad 6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay

from the date of arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live

and proximate link between them would also stand snapped and thereby,

had quashed the detention order on this ground.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu',

reported in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay

of 36 days in passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu

would snap the live and proximate link between the grounds and purpose

of detention. Hence, in view of the unexplained and inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention, after the arrest of the detenu, the detention

order in the present case, is liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent

on 23.01.2025 in No.29/BCDFGISSSV/2025, is hereby set aside and the

Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed. The petitioner / detenue viz.,

Nagavalli, female, aged 39 years, W/o.Sekar, confined at Special Prison

for Women, Puzhal, Chennai, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith,

unless her confinement is required in connection with any other case.

                                                                             [M.S.R, J.]          [V.L.N, J.]
                                                                                         09.06.2025
                    kas







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )


                    Index: Yes/No
                    Neutral Citation









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis        ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )


                                                                                  M.S.RAMESH, J.
                                                                                            and
                                                                         V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

                                                                                                           kas

                    To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat Chennai 600 009

2.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Office of the Commissioner of Police (Goondas Section) Vepery, Chennai - 7

3.The Superintendent Special Cell for women Central Prisons Puzhal, Chennai

4.The Inspector of Police G-2, Secretariat Colony Police Station Chennai

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

09.06.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/06/2025 02:00:52 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter