Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1129 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025
1 W.A.(MD)NO.1377 OF 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.(MD)No.1377 of 2025 AND
C.M.P.(MD)Nos.8299 & 8300 of 2025
S.Boopathy,
President,
Differently Abled Welfare Society(Regn.No.18/2015),
84-A, Swamy Vivekanandar Nagar,
Surveyor Colony, Madurai
Tamil Nadu – 625 007. ... Appellant / 4th Respondent
Vs.
1. J.Jeyakumar Jeseph ... 1st Respondent / Petitioner
2. The District Collector,
Madurai District Collectorate,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu-625 002.
3. The District Collector,
(Registrar for Societies),
Maurai North Registration District,
Madurai North District Registrar Office,
Rajakambeeram, Y.Othakadai,
Madurai.
4. The Branch Manager,
SIDCO Branch Office,
Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development
Corporation Ltd.,
SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kappalur,
Madurai District. ... Respondents 2 to 4/
Respondents 1 to 3
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/06/2025 02:27:05 pm )
2 W.A.(MD)NO.1377 OF 2025
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to
allow the writ appeal and set aside the impugned order dated
04.11.2024 passed in W.P.(MD)No.26250 of 2024.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Thirumal
For R-1 : Mr.P.Murughadasan
For R-2 to R-4 : Mr.D.Sasikumar,
Additional Government Pleader.
***
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated
04.11.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.26250 of 2024.
3. The learned single Judge had directed the District Registrar
to consider the writ petitioner's representation and pass appropriate
orders in accordance with law.
4. Virtually, the writ petitioner obtained an order for
conducting enquiry under Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies
Registration Act, 1975. The learned counsel appearing for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/06/2025 02:27:05 pm )
appellant points out that the jurisdiction under Section 36 of the Act
can be invoked only if there is an application by a majority of the
members of the committee of a registered Society or on the
application of not less than one third of the members of that
registered Society. Such an order could not have been passed by the
learned single Judge at the instance of a solitary member.
5. There is considerable force in this argument. But then, we
are unable to accept for the simple reason that the direction of the
learned single Judge was complied with vide proceedings in
Na.Ka.No.5421/E1/2024 dated 21.02.2025. A copy of the
proceedings dated 21.02.2025 has been produced by the learned
counsel for the appellant. In these circumstances, we have to close
this writ appeal as infructuous. It is for the parties to work their
rights in the manner known to law. This writ appeal is closed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (K.RAJASEKAR, J.) 5th June 2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/06/2025 02:27:05 pm )
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.
PMU
To:
1. The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai, Tamil Nadu-625 002.
2. The District Collector, (Registrar for Societies), Madurai North Registration District, Madurai North District Registrar Office, Rajakambeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai.
3. The Branch Manager, SIDCO Branch Office, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai District.
05.06.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/06/2025 02:27:05 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!