Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalaivani … vs The Secretary To The Government
2025 Latest Caselaw 842 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 842 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2025

Madras High Court

Kalaivani … vs The Secretary To The Government on 9 July, 2025

Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
                                                                                          HCP.No.895 of 2025

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 09.07.2025

                                                          CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
                                                              AND
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                   H.C.P.No.895 of 2025

                     Kalaivani                                             … Petitioner

                                                                Vs

                     1.The Secretary to the Government,
                       Home Prohibition & Excise Department,
                       Secretariat,
                       Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.Commissioner of Police/Detaining Authority,
                       Coimbatore City,
                       Coimbatore District.

                     3.The Superintendent,
                       Central Prison,
                       Coimbatore.

                     4.State Rep. by
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Vadavalli Police Station,
                       Coimbatore District.                      … Respondents
                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records in connection with the


                     Page 1 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )
                                                                                              HCP.No.895 of 2025

                     order of the Detention passed by the 2nd respondent dated 01.04.2025 in
                     c.No.47/G/IS/2025 against the petitioner's husband G.Jaganth Singh, M/45
                     years, son of Gunasingh, who is confined at Central Prison, Coimbatore and
                     set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to produce the
                     detenue before this Court and set him at liberty.


                                  For Petitioner               : Mr.A.Saranraj

                                  For Respondents          : Mr.E.Raj Thilak
                                                        Additional Public Prosecutor


                                                                  ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

The petitioner herein, who is the wife of the detenu, G.Jaganath

Singh S/o. Gunasingh, aged about 45 years, now confined at Central Prison,

Coimbatore, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention

order passed by the second respondent dated 01.04.2025 issued against her

husband, branding him as "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of

Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug

Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand

Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

[Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Though several grounds are raised in the petition, the learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is an inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention.

4. In the instant case, the detenue was arrested on 31.01.2025 and

thereafter, the detention order came to be passed on 01.04.2025. This fact is

not disputed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. In the case of 'Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura',

reported in '2022 LiveLaw (SC) 813', when there was an inordinate delay

from the date of proposal till passing of the detention order and likewise,

between the date of detention order and the actual arrest, the Hon'ble

Supreme Court had held that the live and proximate link, between the

grounds and the purpose of detention, stands snapped in arresting the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

detenu. The relevant observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is extracted

hereunder:-

“20. It is manifestly clear from a conspectus of the above decisions of this Court, that the underlying principle is that if there is unreasonable delay between the date of the order of detention & actual arrest of the detenu and in the same manner from the date of the proposal and passing of the order of detention, such delay unless satisfactorily explained throws a considerable doubt on the genuineness of the requisite subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently render the detention order bad and invalid because the “live and proximate link” between the grounds of detention and the purpose of detention is snapped in arresting the detenu. A question whether the delay is unreasonable and stands unexplained depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

6. Drawing inspiration from the judgment in Sushanta Kumar

Banik's case, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of 'Gomathi Vs.

Principal Secretary to Government and Others', reported in '2023 SCC

OnLine Mad 6332', had held that when there is an inordinate delay from the

date of arrest/date of proposal till the order of detention, the live and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

proximate link between them would also stand snapped and thereby, had

quashed the detention order on this ground.

7. In yet another case i.e., in 'Nagaraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu',

reported in '(2018) 3 MWN (Cri) 428', this Court had held that the delay of

36 days in passing the detention order after the arrest of the detenu would

snap the live and proximate link between the grounds and purpose of

detention. Hence, in view of the unexplained and inordinate delay in

passing the order of detention, after the arrest of the detenu, the detention

order in the present case, is liable to be quashed.

8. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent

on 01.04.2025 in C.No.47/G/IS/2025, is hereby set aside and the Habeas

Corpus Petition is allowed. The detenue viz., G.Jaganath Singh, aged about

45 years, S/o.Gunasingh, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his

confinement is required in connection with any other case.

                     [M.S.R., J]              [V.L.N., J]
                     09.07.2025
                     nl
                     Index: Yes/No






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )


                     Speaking/Non-speaking order
                     Internet: Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation: Yes/No


                     To

                     1.The Secretary to the Government,

Home Prohibition & Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.Commissioner of Police/Detaining Authority, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

4.State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore District.

5.The Joint Secretary, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

nl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

09.07.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/07/2025 09:21:08 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter